Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Another Lyman 21 question!!
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 199
Member Since:
January 20, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
August 3, 2022 - 2:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

My LGS stumbled upon a model 94 (#960424) that wears a Lyman receiver sight. The owner claims it was special order/factory original but offers no proof/letter, etc. –  other than the wear is consistent with the rest of the rifle. He is unwilling to remove to check for other signs as to originality. The gun also sports a ladder sight (44a, I believe). Question: if the Lyman is  factory original, would/could they also have installed a rear ladder sight?!!!? Does this immediately invalidates the receiver sight. Doesn’t make sense to me but I’m new to the Lever and Lyman game. Would they have installed a blank or no dovetail for a sight at all??

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4912
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
August 3, 2022 - 5:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

foxfire said The gun also sports a ladder sight (44a, I believe). Question: if the Lyman is  factory original, would/could they also have installed a rear ladder sight?!!!?
  

Probably not, but not certainly not.  Nobody with good sense would order both those rear sights (a blank or a Lyman #6 was usually installed when a 21 was ordered), but good sense was not a prerequisite for placing a special order.  If it can’t be lettered, I’d consider the 21 non-original.  It may have been installed soon after the gun was purchased, which would explain the wear being consistent, but that doesn’t make it factory original.  If that was what happened, & the original sight was left in place, it proves the original owner didn’t know how to use an aperture sight properly.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 201
Member Since:
March 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
August 3, 2022 - 9:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Personally I have seen more than a few Winchesters with Lyman 21’s or tang peep sights wearing standard barrel sights that did letter. But if the 94 falls outside the letterable range there is really no way to be 100 percent sure. My 2 cents.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4912
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
4
August 4, 2022 - 1:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

However the 21 got there, salient question now is “what’s this ’94 worth”?  It’s certainly not worth the same as a gun with a verifiable factory-installed 21, & the current owner is unreasonable if he refuses to recognize that fact.  It’s worth the value of any other ’94 in comparable cond., plus another $250 or so for the 21.  Yes, the sight alone could be sold for more than that on ebay, but this is one that can’t be removed to sell separately, because it would leave holes in the rcvr.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13255
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
August 4, 2022 - 2:43 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The odds of the Lyman No. 21 being factory original is significantly less then 50/50 dues to the standard No. 44A rear being present on the barrel. If the owner is not willing to remove the Lyman No. 21, that indicates that he is well aware that it is not original. It is rather easy to tell if the hole for it was added after the fact once the sight is removed.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 199
Member Since:
January 20, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
August 4, 2022 - 10:20 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
The odds of the Lyman No. 21 being factory original is significantly less then 50/50 dues to the standard No. 44A rear being present on the barrel. If the owner is not willing to remove the Lyman No. 21, that indicates that he is well aware that it is not original. It is rather easy to tell if the hole for it was added after the fact once the sight is removed.

Bert

  

Thanks all!!

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: cj57, 1873man, 426crown, clarence, Jim McKee, Tedk, Bill Hanzel, KingCobb, DB
Guest(s) 40
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
1873man: 5353
clarence: 4911
TXGunNut: 4099
Chuck: 3844
steve004: 3468
twobit: 2911
Maverick: 2058
JWA: 1928
Big Larry: 1899
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 16
Topics: 10974
Posts: 94738

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1517
Members: 11927
Moderators: 3
Admins: 3
Navigation