Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1892 takedown sights
Avatar
Darrin Smith
Central Kansas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 237
Member Since:
March 21, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 24, 2021 - 3:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

I have a reasonably nice 38-40 that shoots good tight groups. The sights however are sketchy at best. The rear sight, I believe is a late one and looks out of place on #37321 (1894). The Marbles #3 on the front is acceptable save for the partially missing bead which makes for difficult p.o.a. shooting. I have a 3 leaf express that suits the condition, & I think the date, that I’m considering installing. Is it correct for the model and date? I also have a front sight I haven’t ID’d that has been filed down on the top of the sides that I’d rather not use. It’s possibly a sheard marked No. 5 on the bottom. I’d like a correct sight instead. Suggestions/comments? 

92-37321-rear-sight.jpgImage Enlarger

92-37321-front-sight.jpgImage Enlarger
3-leaf-express.jpgImage Enlarger
front-sight-1.jpgImage Enlarger
front-sight-2.jpgImage Enlarger

Thanks in advance,

Darrin

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5885
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 24, 2021 - 5:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Your rear sight is not a Winchester buckhorn sight.  If it were me I’d put Winchester sights on both front and rear.

Avatar
Darrin Smith
Central Kansas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 237
Member Since:
March 21, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 24, 2021 - 9:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Chuck said
Your rear sight is not a Winchester buckhorn sight.  If it were me I’d put Winchester sights on both front and rear.  

My thoughts Chuck. I’m looking for them.

Darrin

Avatar
rogertherelic
Santa Clara, CA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 935
Member Since:
January 27, 1992
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
4
October 27, 2021 - 3:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Just an observation:  The rear sight appears to be a later, post 1930’s vintage sight.  It has the blunted front point.  I believe the rear sight for that time period would have serrated edges  on sight “ears”.  The Express sight is shorter in length and won’t cover the probable elevator mark on the barrel.  The elevator appears to be correct for that time period.  Hope this helps.  RDB

Avatar
Darrin Smith
Central Kansas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 237
Member Since:
March 21, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
October 27, 2021 - 11:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

rogertherelic said
Just an observation:  The rear sight appears to be a later, post 1930’s vintage sight.  It has the blunted front point.  I believe the rear sight for that time period would have serrated edges  on sight “ears”.  The Express sight is shorter in length and won’t cover the probable elevator mark on the barrel.  The elevator appears to be correct for that time period.  Hope this helps.  RDB  

Point well taken. I will attempt to find the correct sight for both front & rear. May take some time. I do have a watch on ebay.

Darrin 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: mikecsa, tim tomlinson, rogertherelic, [email protected], Zebulon
Guest(s) 675
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6482
Chuck: 5885
steve004: 5216
1873man: 4703
deerhunter: 2713
Big Larry: 2559
twobit: 2505
mrcvs: 2213
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
redfish282000
MFoster
Daltsav
Monk1950
Redcedar7T
KrzHorse
drjjpdc
djwalsh
fzando
WASpalding
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14826
Posts: 132706

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10059
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation