Hello Dave,
Model 1897 s/n 243130 was manufactured in April 1904. It was a commercial sales gun (the U.S. Government (military) did not purchase any Model 1897 shotguns prior to the U.S. involvement in WW I).
What is the barrel length and the choke marking on the barrel? Is it a Solid frame or a Take Down?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Hello Bert,
The marking on the barrel is FULL, it is a takedown I believe as you just have to pull tubular magazine forward and 1/4 turn to remove barrel from the receiver. Barrel length is 20″. The fore stock and screw on choke may not be original, the fore stock is a black finished wood and the choke is a Weaver Choke. Any help with what an original version is supposed to look like would be appreciated.
Dave
Dave1970 said
Bert,I unscrewed the choke and used a dowel down the barrel till it touched the bolt face and measured it at 23-1/2″ barrel length. I believe that is more accurate. Not sure is this barrel was modified or not.
Dave
The barrel has been modified, and it was most likely originally 30-inchs in length (standard) with a Full choke barrel. Apparently it was cut down (shortened) to install the aftermarket Weaver choke.
If you are interested in determining what the original configuration was, the Cody Firearms Museum (CFM) record office can (for a modest fee) provide you with a factory letter that will contain all of the information that was recorded in the original Winchester factory warehouse ledger record. The letter will look something like the example I have attached below.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
UpInTheBigTrees said
Bert H. said
Hello Dave,
It was a commercial sales gun (the U.S. Government (military) did not purchase any Model 1897 shotguns prior to the U.S. involvement in WW I).
Bert
Moro Rebellion? Mexican Punitive Expedition?
None that were officially documented. That does not mean that a very small number of Model 1897 Riot Guns could not have been used in those events, but they would not have been official government contract procurements.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Bert H. said
UpInTheBigTrees said
Bert H. said
Hello Dave,
It was a commercial sales gun (the U.S. Government (military) did not purchase any Model 1897 shotguns prior to the U.S. involvement in WW I).
Bert
Moro Rebellion? Mexican Punitive Expedition?
None that were officially documented. That does not mean that a very small number of Model 1897 Riot Guns could not have been used in those events, but they would not have been official government contract procurements.
Bert
I think the acquisition and successful uses of 1897’s in those conflicts are pretty well documented by the writings of several participants, including Pershing himself. But I understand the lack of official documentation of the purchase. I’ve read numbers like 200 guns, so perhaps they were bought with unit funds.
Here is an article written by Philip Schreier, Director, NRA Museums. He mentions the use of the 1897 in the Philippines.
https://doughboy.org/the-classics-winchester-model-1897-trench-gun-of-world-war-i/
In Canfield’s book on Combat Shotguns he devotes several pages on the 1897 used in the Philippines. There is even a picture of some of the troops holding them.
But, going back even further he mentions 1887’s being tested in 1889 by the Military and 50 1893’s in 1895.
Chuck said
Here is an article written by Philip Schreier, Director, NRA Museums. He mentions the use of the 1897 in the Philippines.https://doughboy.org/the-classics-winchester-model-1897-trench-gun-of-world-war-i/
While Phil “mentions” the use, there is no corroborating information offered. Of further note, if any Model 1897 shotguns were actually used for the Philippine insurrection, they positively were not “Trench” guns. The picture of the Trench Gun in that article is actually a WW II Model 97, not a “Model 1897” as captioned.
Again, I am not definitively stating that it was not possible that a small number of Model 1897 shotguns were used for military campaigns prior to WW I. What I am firmly stating, is that until verifiable evidence is found, the military use of Winchester Model 1897 shotguns prior to WW I is just another one of the many stories (urban myths) that have been told & retold to embellish and romanticize the guns being sold to collectors.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
I do agree that nobody has found the Invoices for any purchases but you need to read Canfield’s book. They were not trench guns. They were riot guns. The estimate is 200.
Canfield quotes from The History of the United States Army by Col. William Ganoe. “Double sentinel posts, one soldier with a rifle and another with a shotgun were placed about camp.” “Maj. Thomas Bundt confirms that soldiers used the shotgun as the weapon of choice in close quarter combat.”
Chuck said
I do agree that nobody has found the Invoices for any purchases but you need to read Canfield’s book. They were not trench guns. They were riot guns. The estimate is 200.Canfield quotes from The History of the United States Army by Col. William Ganoe. “Double sentinel posts, one soldier with a rifle and another with a shotgun were placed about camp.” “Maj. Thomas Bundt confirms that soldiers used the shotgun as the weapon of choice in close quarter combat.”
I have read Canfield’s book… but I find that number (as small as it is) to be a hard stretch. In my 30+ year survey of the Model 1897, the number of Riot Guns manufactured in the early production years for the Model 1897 is very small.
To preface my previous comment, production of the Model 1897 began in early June 1897 (at serial number 34141). Through December 31st, 1898, serial numbers reached 63867 (29,727 guns). In that same production run, there are < 40 Riot Guns listed in the factory ledger records. Winchester was not yet manufacturing the Riot Guns as a regular course of business, and apparently only when a specific order was received for them.
In my research of the factory ledger records and the information I have compiled in my research survey, the first significant size batch of Model 1897 Riot Guns began at serial number 93000 (February 1900), and these were nearly all Standard (field) grade guns that were already in warehouse stock but pulled back (sent to Russ) to be converted to 20-inch Riot Guns (in the March – June 1900 time period). This large batch of factory converted Riot Guns are believed to have been ordered by the State of Texas to arm the Police and militia that was deployed to quell the massive civil rioting & looting that was occurring in Galveston TX after the hurricane devasted that area in January 1900.
The Philippine insurrection was in full swing by early 1899, and as of that time, Winchester had manufactured fewer than 50 total Model 1897 Riot Guns. Accordingly, I find it highly unlikely that 200 Winchester Riot guns were acquired for use by the U.S. Army & Marine Corps.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
I know your time in the archives gives you production details. But.
The Philippine insurrection started in early 1899 for the US and continued to mid 1902 but the guerrilla warfare continued for some time after that. The US occupation lasted for decades. The shotguns that were there are not clearly documented but the same is true for the WWI trench and riot shotguns. Canfield states that the shotguns used in the Philippines were procured between 1900 and 1910. He believes that some standard shotguns had the barrels removed by Winchester and replaced with the 20″ barrels. Only a very few are martially marked. He shows a picture of about 20 Army troops holding Trapdoor Springfields and 8 riot shot guns. I don’t believe he mentions any going to the Marines?
So, if some were modified and with the production data you have, is 200 possible?
The same positively is not true for the WW I Trench Guns. It is documented history that the U.S. Government ordered and issued more than 20K Model 1897s for use in WW I.
In answer to your question, “Yes” it is possible, but where did Canfield derive his numbers from? With no verifiable records or documentation, and no referenced information source, what he published can only be viewed as pure conjecture.
The U.S. Marines are documented as participating in the guerrilla warfare during the Philippine insurrection.
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
I got to thinking about something else he has in the book. He shows a picture of what he calls a “Philippine era Winchester Model 97 riot gun”. It is a take down. If he is talking about shotguns procured from 1898 to 1912 when was the first take down manufactured?
As far as his sources he lists at least 100 sources. Books, articles, Winchester documents, Manufacturer’s manuals, literature, Government documents, memoranda and reports. Sorry but he doesn’t list which one specifically covers each portion of the book. Bruce Canfield has written over a half dozen books on Military arms and armament. He is a well respected source among Military Collectors.
Chuck said
I got to thinking about something else he has in the book. He shows a picture of what he calls a “Philippine era Winchester Model 97 riot gun”. It is a take down. If he is talking about shotguns procured from 1898 to 1912 when was the first take down manufactured?As far as his sources he lists at least 100 sources. Books, articles, Winchester documents, Manufacturer’s manuals, literature, Government documents, memoranda and reports. Sorry but he doesn’t list which one specifically covers each portion of the book. Bruce Canfield has written over a half dozen books on Military arms and armament. He is a well respected source among Military Collectors.
Winchester did not begin manufacturing Model “97” Take down Riot Guns until sometime well after WW I. Prior to, and all the way through WW I, all of the Riot and Trench Guns were Solid frames.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Chad@GalleryFirearms said
Fantastic thread gentlemen! We just acquired a handful of 1897s in the last couple of weeks and plan to start research next week. This conversation was a valuable start!
Please post the information about them here, or get in touch with me directly.
Bert – [email protected]
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
1 Guest(s)
