Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Need some reloading help for 25-35 ammo
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2295
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 1, 2016 - 10:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hi guys,

I know almost nothing about the fine art of reloading.  But, I have a “Winchester friend” from France who has asked for some help.  I will post his email here and the images he sent and ask for your input which I will then forward to him.  Thanks so much

Michael

I have a Winchester 94 chambered in 25-35. This rifle was manufactured in 1912, and the bore of its 26 inches octagonal barrel is in pristine condition. If the 25-35 is an accurate ammunition, this particular rifle lives to its reputation.I first used factory SUPER X ammunition which gave extremely tight group. But those are hard to find on my side of the Atlantic, so I started reloading. I also thought this 100 year old barrel should be treated a bit more gently, hoping it would last an other 100 years or more.

My only choice was to use Sierra .257″ 120 grains HPBT bullet, and the accuracy is awesome (I am using a marble tang sight). But it means single load directly in the chamber, because of their pointed shape and because the cartridge is too long to be fed from the tubular magazine up into the barrel. I have attached a picture of what this rifle can do with them Anything outside of the 1 inch white circle is always my fault.
I am now thinking of casting bullet to reduce cost and wear, and the choice is between RCBS .258 100 grains and RCBS .258 120 grains mould, both with gas check.
I like the 120 grains because it is the closest in shape and weight to the original Winchester bullet, and would produce a cartridge of the same length as the manufactured one so a good fit in the chamber and the barrel. It has a long nose for good centering and a long section to catch the groove.  But first problem is it is a soft point not a flat nose, and second problem is it doesn’t have a crimp groove. I have attached a good drawing of it.
The 100 grains is obviously shorter, and would produce a cartidge 0.1 inches shorter than the manufactured one (the length of the nose in front of the crimp groove is 0.4 inch). The shorter nose may not be well introduced inside the barrel when the cartidge is in the chamber. Advantage are it is flat point and it has a crimp groove. I have attached a picture of the mould.
I would very much apreciate your advise on the best choice of cast bullet for best accuracy with this 25-35. I need to take in consideration that cast bullet can’t go as fast as the original 2200 ft/sec, so I worry that a lighter, shorter and slower bullet may not stabilize well in the barrel and its fast 1:8 twist rate.
 
DSC01551_1_1.jpgImage Enlarger25-35-Win-Clymer_Sammi_Cart_Cust_25_80_GC_Reduced.gifImage Enlarger111702.jpgImage EnlargerIMAG0606_1.jpgImage EnlargerR.C.B.S._Mold_257-120-SP_119_gr_Sketch.jpegImage Enlarger

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 532
Member Since:
December 27, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 2, 2016 - 8:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

The folks at– http://castboolits.gunloads.com/ –or– https://www.shootersforum.com/ –would know what he needs.

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5034
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 7, 2016 - 3:09 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Yes, I’m a Cast Boolit member and can assure you we have a few members who can help. We even have a few members in France who may be able to give him some hands-on help. I think he’s on the right track with the 100gr RCBS mould but I don’t load the 25-35…yet. The 120 gr bullet looks like it was designed for a bolt gun.

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10840
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 7, 2016 - 4:04 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

TXGunNut said
Yes, I’m a Cast Boolit member and can assure you we have a few members who can help. We even have a few members in France who may be able to give him some hands-on help. I think he’s on the right track with the 100gr RCBS mould but I don’t load the 25-35…yet. The 120 gr bullet looks like it was designed for a bolt gun.  

Mike,

The standard bullet weight for the 25-35 WCF was 117-grains.  I corresponded with Francois and recommended that he try both bullet weights with varying powder types and charges.  My choice would be to start with the 120-grain bullet.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 91
Member Since:
February 4, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
December 7, 2016 - 9:56 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Use the 117 grain Hornady round nose as Bert suggested over 19-21 grains of IMR-4320 and see how that treats you. Remington also made a 117 grain 25 caliber bullet, but it has more of a spritzer shape to it. You can use it also, but I would recommend loading one in the chamber and only one in the magazine.         RRM

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5034
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
December 8, 2016 - 4:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

Mike,

The standard bullet weight for the 25-35 WCF was 117-grains.  I corresponded with Francois and recommended that he try both bullet weights with varying powder types and charges.  My choice would be to start with the 120-grain bullet.

Bert  

Does he already have the RCBS moulds, Bert?

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10840
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
December 8, 2016 - 4:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

TXGunNut said

Does he already have the RCBS moulds, Bert?  

I do not believe that he does.  He indicated that he had manufactured bullets in the two weights previously mentioned.  Of the two, the 120-grain bullet would be my choice, as it is just 3-grains heavier than standard.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Ontario Canada
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 584
Member Since:
April 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
December 9, 2016 - 3:12 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

25-35. Had an unusual for the era

(possibly the first. ?). Fast twist meant to stabilize heavy bullets. Yet the fast twists often do well with lighter as well  , so the best of all worlds. Great cal.

anyone know the history of the original fast twist technology?  I think. It. Originated with smokeless and higher velocity utilizing jacketed bullets.  Technology happened quick in the 1890’s

amazes me that those early smokeless designed cartridges and all components were as well balanced and efficient seemingly overnight still used today 

phil

Phils-Schuetzen-compressed.jpg 

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5034
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
December 9, 2016 - 3:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I think Tom at Accurate can make a custom mould with a crimp groove but not sure if he is set up to export. He made my 38-40 mould and another for my 32 Special. Oops, think he only makes .270 and bigger moulds. NOE does semi-custom and I think he exports. He has a clone of the Lyman 260325.

 

http://noebulletmolds.com/NV/index.php?cPath=26_179

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
California
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 486
Member Since:
July 19, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
December 9, 2016 - 8:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

25-20 said
25-35. Had an unusual for the era

(possibly the first. ?). Fast twist meant to stabilize heavy bullets. Yet the fast twists often do well with lighter as well  , so the best of all worlds. Great cal.

anyone know the history of the original fast twist technology?  I think. It. Originated with smokeless and higher velocity utilizing jacketed bullets.  Technology happened quick in the 1890’s

amazes me that those early smokeless designed cartridges and all components were as well balanced and efficient seemingly overnight still used today 

phil  

Phil,

I just bought a ’94 carbine 25-35 ( for sale ) to help a friend get gas money to get home ( Reno has it’s dangers ! ).

I took it plus a 32-40, 38-40 (M92) and 38-55. All carbines. My favorite was the 23×35. A great round, and accurate.

Bill

Avatar
California
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 486
Member Since:
July 19, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
December 9, 2016 - 8:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

correction: 25×35

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5034
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
December 10, 2016 - 4:54 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The 25-35 is an under-rated cartridge, IMHO. I don’t own a rifle in this chambering (yet) but the numbers fascinate me.

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 532
Member Since:
December 27, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
December 10, 2016 - 5:19 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Jeepers, Bill.  A .25-35, .32-40, .38-40 and .38-55 “to help a friend get gas money to get home”–must be taking the long way around, or was he planning on punching the afterburners!

Avatar
California
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 486
Member Since:
July 19, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
December 10, 2016 - 5:44 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

FTW:

I got a little ahead of myself typing….bought the 25×35, took all the rest plus the new purchase to the range.

That  would have been quite a spree at Reno if all came home with me !

Bill Embarassed

Avatar
California
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 486
Member Since:
July 19, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
December 10, 2016 - 5:58 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I posted the following under “Winchester Rifles” this morning :

Has anyone had experience with Sellier & Bellot Ammunition 6.5x52mm Rimmed 117 Grain Soft Point as an option to 25×35 WIN. ammo ?

Feedback would be appreciated. FYI: I do not reload.

Midway sells it as a “similar product” when searching Winchester 25×35 ammo.

Bill

Avatar
Ontario Canada
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 584
Member Since:
April 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
December 10, 2016 - 7:45 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bill I have to avoid shows , auctions stores all places of temptation.

Yes  I have used the S/B  ammo in 25-35  in two mod 1894 rifles early 1900’s ,  and a mod 64 rifle ,  and it worked great in all 3 , accurate and surprisingly flat shooting at 300 M I dont think its hotter than the Win factory .I think it has metric data on the box as to ballistics. and not much recoil . no pressure signs

. I shoot it primarily because it really works well, has good cases (I only reloaded some a few times  to test. not multi fired yet)  its less $ than I could reload it for , at under a buck a shot  

I believe the Europeans took the 25-35 cartridge , copied it exactly , renamed it with their metric designation , and it was very popular in their favored combination hunting guns. and still popular today hence  S/B still making loaded ammo.

I will have to get a box out tommoro if any one wants details

 

Phil

Phils-Schuetzen-compressed.jpg 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: Dave M.
Guest(s) 78
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6368
TXGunNut: 5034
Chuck: 4598
1873man: 4322
steve004: 4250
Big Larry: 2344
twobit: 2295
mrcvs: 1726
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12760
Posts: 111146

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1766
Members: 8853
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation