Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters




sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Print sp_TopicIcon
Winchester 1895 in .30-40 Krag
September 6, 2014
1:45 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 926
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It appears that the .30-40 Krag cartridge was developed as a smokeless cartridge. Therefore, all Winchester 1895’s, including flatsides, can be fired safely with smokeless powder. I believe this to be correct, even if these date to as early as 1895? Is this indeed correct?

September 6, 2014
1:59 pm
Avatar
Ontario Canada
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 681
Member Since:
April 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I have a 95 Flatside in 30/40 , and have fired different brands of factory in It ( mostly Win of various ages ) ,and never noticed any ill effects.( FWIW ) Kick was less than I expected

Phil

Phils-Schuetzen-compressed.jpg 

September 6, 2014
7:01 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 98
Member Since:
June 11, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I have a reproduction of the Winchester 1896 catalogue and smokeless cartridges were offered for both the 38-72 and the 40-72, so the earliest 1895’s could safely be fired using smokeless cartridges and modern smokeless loads duplicating original pressures and velocities.

September 6, 2014
7:18 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 185
Member Since:
January 19, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The Model 1895 was chambered in .405Win and 30-06 Sprg granted the 30-06 did beat up the bolt face a bit with heavy use but the design is very strong.

September 7, 2014
9:50 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 926
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

25-20 said
I have a 95 Flatside in 30/40 , and have fired different brands of factory in It ( mostly Win of various ages ) ,and never noticed any ill effects.( FWIW ) Kick was less than I expected

Phil

How about a picture of your flatside?

September 7, 2014
11:18 am
Avatar
Ontario Canada
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 681
Member Since:
April 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

My Flatside has been refinished which may upset some . I have a couple of lpics that I could email to anyone who can post pics. I want to get a good digital camera and learn to post pics . I was hoping that this site will change to a simple format like email attachment for pics

Phil

Phils-Schuetzen-compressed.jpg 

September 7, 2014
8:39 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1740
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"The first smokeless caliber ever loaded by Winchester in 1893 though not cataloged until 1894 was the "30U.S.G." Though better known as the 30-40 Krag, that headstamp did not appear on Winchester Cartridges until after WWII" -Page 209 of Giles & Shuey’s "One Hundred Years of Winchester Cartridge Boxes 1856-1956".

Just thought I’d quote that little tid bit as it seems to explain things quite well.

Sincerely,
Maverick

September 10, 2014
1:07 pm
Avatar
Great Basin
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 318
Member Since:
November 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

http://s860.photobucket.com/user/Flatside/media/cb7df3bd-7d28-4d97-a2bb-632a21b49e34_zps4c83c1c9.jpg.html

cb7df3bd-7d28-4d97-a2bb-632a21b49e34_zps4c83c1c9.jpgImage Enlarger

I’ve been collecting 1895’s for a while and always wanted a flatside, but never had the opportunity. As luck would have it, I got the chance for two in the past few months and I finally had a few bucks when the right deals came along. The first is a 40-72 with octagon barrel and serial number 637. Just yesterday picked up the one in back. It’s a 30-40 Krag with the almost unreal serial number 29.

Haven’t had the chance to shoot either one yet, but will work up some light target loads for both. I certainly don’t plan to hunt with either of them, so don’t feel the need to push any kind of heavy load through them. Although, if either of them groups well, I may be tempted to sneak out to the alfalfa field and go after a buck. Thanks for letting me share.

September 10, 2014
4:08 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 98
Member Since:
June 11, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ooo I am envious of the 40-72 flat side!! Don’t hesitate to load some cartridges to original ballistics for that one, provided you use smokeless powder slower than 2400. I had a 38-72 and found that 5744 with a magnum primer was just the ticket. Got a nice doe with mine, but it was not a flat side.

September 11, 2014
5:28 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1126
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Mark D. said

http://s860.photobucket.com/user/Flatside/media/cb7df3bd-7d28-4d97-a2bb-632a21b49e34_zps4c83c1c9.jpg.html

cb7df3bd-7d28-4d97-a2bb-632a21b49e34_zps4c83c1c9.jpgImage Enlarger

I’ve been collecting 1895’s for a while and always wanted a flatside, but never had the opportunity. As luck would have it, I got the chance for two in the past few months and I finally had a few bucks when the right deals came along. The first is a 40-72 with octagon barrel and serial number 637. Just yesterday picked up the one in back. It’s a 30-40 Krag with the almost unreal serial number 29.

Haven’t had the chance to shoot either one yet, but will work up some light target loads for both. I certainly don’t plan to hunt with either of them, so don’t feel the need to push any kind of heavy load through them. Although, if either of them groups well, I may be tempted to sneak out to the alfalfa field and go after a buck. Thanks for letting me share.

Very neat!

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

September 11, 2014
7:36 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 318
Member Since:
September 9, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Nice find. I like those flatsides with the tapered octagon barrels. Mine’s a .38-72, but serial number is not near as low as yours.

September 11, 2014
8:43 pm
Avatar
Great Basin
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 318
Member Since:
November 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I’m kind of partial to the 38-72 as well. I have a second model with a round barrel. I’ve got a set of reloading dies for it, but haven’t come up with any brass yet. Thanks for the advise on using 5744. Been going to give it and 4759 a try.

September 12, 2014
5:22 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 98
Member Since:
June 11, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Buffalo Arms might have some made by Captech (formerly Jamison). I had some and it was first class stuff.

September 12, 2014
2:06 pm
Avatar
Troutdale, OR
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1134
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I saw that first model .40-72 serial# 637 for sale at Collectors Firearms awhile back. Very nice rifle and very good buy, too. I was thinking about buying it, but "somebody" beat me to it… Wink

September 12, 2014
6:44 pm
Avatar
Great Basin
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 318
Member Since:
November 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I hesitated briefly, since I already have a second model 40-72 with a 26" tapered octagon barrel. Alas, my overwhelming need for a flatside outweighed the grief I was knew I was going to get from my wife. 🙂

I live in a pretty remote area, so I don’t get to many gun shows except for the November Big Reno Show. That means I have to take some chances on internet guns and occasionally get lucky like I did on that one.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0

Most Users Ever Online: 628

Currently Online: Erin Grivicich
52 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)


Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 16

Topics: 8762

Posts: 75585


Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1172

Members: 10322

Moderators: 4

Admins: 3


Top Posters:

1873man: 4855

TXGunNut: 3139

clarence: 2954

twobit: 2680

Chuck: 2630

steve004: 2232

Maverick: 1740

Big Larry: 1617

JWA: 1568

RickC: 1323