Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester 53 with cheekpiece stock
Avatar
steff
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 227
Member Since:
September 11, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
August 18, 2017 - 3:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi experts,

 

found this Model 53 with unusual stock:

 

win53.jpgImage Enlarger

 

what do you think about it? Original or not ?

 

Greetings from germany

 

Stefan

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
pdog72
Wyoming - Gods Country
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1285
Member Since:
January 26, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
August 18, 2017 - 4:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Steff

My vote is no. I don’t see anything about it that looks correct. The checkering is wrong, the cheek piece is not the shape I’ve seen before, and the fore end length is too short. I’m curious if the barrel has another dovetail underneath where the original cap attached or does it have an incorrect barrel too?

                                                                               ~Gary~

                                                                                                                                                                              94-SRR.jpg

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2493
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
August 18, 2017 - 4:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hello Steff,

I would agree that the rifle does not look correct for a number of reasons.  What is the serial number and upper tang stamp style?

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
steff
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 227
Member Since:
September 11, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
August 18, 2017 - 4:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I doesn’t buy the rifle. Have only pictures.

 

win53_3.jpgImage Enlargerwin53_4.jpgImage Enlargerwin53_2.jpgImage Enlargerwin53_5.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Many thanks for your help.

How realistic is the probability for the gun to get a correct, original stock to change it?

 

Stefan

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
pdog72
Wyoming - Gods Country
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1285
Member Since:
January 26, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
August 18, 2017 - 5:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I wouldn’t waste my time on it. The pistol grip stock is also something of concern since the rifle should have been a straight grip. I suppose you could stretch your imagination and assume it was a special order deluxe pistol grip 53 that ended up with different wood on it. Just too many issues to even consider it, in my opinion.

                                                                               ~Gary~

                                                                                                                                                                              94-SRR.jpg

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2493
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
August 18, 2017 - 5:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Steff,

Model 53 rifles did not have cut off magazines with flat end caps and a magazine retaining ring on them.  My guess is that the receiver and magazine may be from a late Model 92 and that the wood and barrel are non original.  

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
steff
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 227
Member Since:
September 11, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
August 18, 2017 - 6:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

You are absolutely right. The weapon is not worth it.

 

Unfortunately it is the only model 53 which I have seen in Germany in my whole time as a collector.

 

Thank you

 

Stefan

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5173
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
8
August 18, 2017 - 8:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I like the fact that it is a .44-40.  Most M53’s a person runs across are in .25-20 or .32-20.  I find the .44-40 darn desirable in the M53. I have never owned a M53 in .44-40.  I agree this rifle is not original so of course it is not a rifle for a collector.  However many of us collectors are also shooters and hunters so a rifle such as this can have its place.  As a hunter/shooter, I find it has appeal.  By the way, there are many ways this rifle may have been altered, but I will weigh-in and say the receiver blue is original. 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: steve004, cj57, winchester nix, David Briggs, markone1966, Robert Drummond Jr, Green River Gus
Guest(s) 170
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6408
Chuck: 5810
steve004: 5173
1873man: 4698
deerhunter: 2694
Big Larry: 2549
twobit: 2493
mrcvs: 2194
Maverick: 2029
Newest Members:
Temomar83
ross
Model94-2025
R.E. Moore
sjGUESTEST
WindsurfAruba
cedar swamp savage
tradecraft
Weida78
Alby
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14716
Posts: 131653

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9983
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation