Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester 1894 1907 30wcf short tube?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 8
Member Since:
November 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 14, 2022 - 5:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hello all, I recently came across a Winchester 1894 in 30-30 from 1907. What is confusing is the feed tube is not extended to the full length of the barrel. I am trying to determine if its possible it came from the factory like this. If so, does it affect the value of the firearm in a positive or negative way? What is a ballpark value on something like this? Trying to gather any available information on this little piece of history. Any insight is appreciated. IMG_3579.jpgImage EnlargerIMG_3578.jpgImage EnlargerIMG_3581.jpgImage EnlargerIMG_3582.jpgImage EnlargerIMG_3583.jpgImage Enlarger 

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 258
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
January 14, 2022 - 6:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Your carbine came like that, a common special order feature, as well as the shotgun butt. The saddle ring was removed 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 8
Member Since:
November 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
January 14, 2022 - 6:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thank you for your answer. It was greatly appreciated. Walt

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10635
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
4
January 14, 2022 - 11:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Walt,

The 1/2 length magazine was an “optional” (no extra cost) item.  The Shotgun butt w/hard rubber butt plate was a “special” order (extra cost) item.  That stated, I highly suspect that the butt stock is not original to the rest of the gun.  It is significantly undersized to the receiver frame and tangs, and it has a repaired crack (most likely caused by the poor fit).  Does the butt plate have a widow’s peak inletted into the top of the butt stock?

In regards to the value enhancement of a 1/2 length magazine tube, for many people it is does not add any value, and for some, it actually reduces the value slightly.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4106
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
January 14, 2022 - 11:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
Walt,

The 1/2 length magazine was an “optional” (no extra cost) item.  The Shotgun butt w/hard rubber butt plate was a “special” order (extra cost) item.  That stated, I highly suspect that the butt stock is not original to the rest of the gun.  It is significantly undersized to the receiver frame and tangs, and it has a repaired crack (most likely caused by the poor fit).  Does the butt plate have a widow’s peak inletted into the top of the butt stock?

In regards to the value enhancement of a 1/2 length magazine tube, for many people it is does not add any value, and for some, it actually reduces the value slightly.

Bert  

As far as an extra charge for a hard rubber shotgun butt, I wonder it it depends on the year of manufacture?  The Model 1894 section of my 1916 Winchester catalog states the following:  “All of the above can be furnished with Half Magazines or Shotgun Butt Stocks, with either metal or rubber butt plate, at same price.”  

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10635
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
6
January 15, 2022 - 12:00 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Steve,

In the early production years, the hard rubber butt plate was a $2 extra cost item. In later years (not sure exactly when), it became a no cost optional item.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 258
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
January 15, 2022 - 7:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

In 1896 1/2 mags and SGBs were offered at no cost. When that carbine was made they were no cost options and were some what popular. As to the stock being undersized, it’s been sanded and repaired with a bolt, I wouldn’t imagine replacing a stock with one with a bolt in it, when you could do the same repair to the that was on it. A shame, but that was a common way to repair stocks.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 258
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
January 15, 2022 - 7:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

FBA6EEBF-0186-44B5-9125-7BE1A8B35715.jpegImage Enlarger

Here he is with a nice buck! LOL That configuration was popular in New England. I’ve seen pics like these and seen a lot of 94s like that hunting in ME and PA, VT

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 8
Member Since:
November 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
January 15, 2022 - 11:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

What a cool picture. His clothes tell a great story. It is a testimonial to the rifle and many firearms in general. The clothes are gone. The hunter, I presume, is gone but the rifle is a useful tool today. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1058
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
January 15, 2022 - 1:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

How many of You gentleman hunters go hunting in a shirt and tie nowadays. Nice picture of one classy dude

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4106
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
January 15, 2022 - 1:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Henry Mero said
How many of You gentleman hunters go hunting in a shirt and tie nowadays. Nice picture of one classy dude  

I suspect he put on his Sunday best for the photo.  Having a photo taken was a big deal back then.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 183
Member Since:
April 30, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
January 15, 2022 - 2:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Note the quite rare proofmark forward-of-the-rear-sight. Have you checked for an incorrect patent date? Should be August 21 but could be the rare and incorrect August 14.

B

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6164
TXGunNut: 4884
Chuck: 4524
1873man: 4268
steve004: 4106
Big Larry: 2297
twobit: 2284
TR: 1697
mrcvs: 1669
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12524
Posts: 108771

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1730
Members: 8734
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation