Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester 1894 1907 30wcf short tube?
Avatar
Walter Lamon
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 8
Member Since:
November 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 14, 2022 - 5:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hello all, I recently came across a Winchester 1894 in 30-30 from 1907. What is confusing is the feed tube is not extended to the full length of the barrel. I am trying to determine if its possible it came from the factory like this. If so, does it affect the value of the firearm in a positive or negative way? What is a ballpark value on something like this? Trying to gather any available information on this little piece of history. Any insight is appreciated. IMG_3579.jpgImage Enlarger

IMG_3578.jpgImage Enlarger
IMG_3581.jpgImage Enlarger
IMG_3582.jpgImage Enlarger
IMG_3583.jpgImage Enlarger
 

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
cj57
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 426
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
January 14, 2022 - 6:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Your carbine came like that, a common special order feature, as well as the shotgun butt. The saddle ring was removed 

Avatar
Walter Lamon
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 8
Member Since:
November 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
January 14, 2022 - 6:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thank you for your answer. It was greatly appreciated. Walt

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13002
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 14, 2022 - 11:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Walt,

The 1/2 length magazine was an “optional” (no extra cost) item.  The Shotgun butt w/hard rubber butt plate was a “special” order (extra cost) item.  That stated, I highly suspect that the butt stock is not original to the rest of the gun.  It is significantly undersized to the receiver frame and tangs, and it has a repaired crack (most likely caused by the poor fit).  Does the butt plate have a widow’s peak inletted into the top of the butt stock?

In regards to the value enhancement of a 1/2 length magazine tube, for many people it is does not add any value, and for some, it actually reduces the value slightly.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5217
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
January 14, 2022 - 11:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said
Walt,

The 1/2 length magazine was an “optional” (no extra cost) item.  The Shotgun butt w/hard rubber butt plate was a “special” order (extra cost) item.  That stated, I highly suspect that the butt stock is not original to the rest of the gun.  It is significantly undersized to the receiver frame and tangs, and it has a repaired crack (most likely caused by the poor fit).  Does the butt plate have a widow’s peak inletted into the top of the butt stock?

In regards to the value enhancement of a 1/2 length magazine tube, for many people it is does not add any value, and for some, it actually reduces the value slightly.

Bert  

As far as an extra charge for a hard rubber shotgun butt, I wonder it it depends on the year of manufacture?  The Model 1894 section of my 1916 Winchester catalog states the following:  “All of the above can be furnished with Half Magazines or Shotgun Butt Stocks, with either metal or rubber butt plate, at same price.”  

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13002
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
January 15, 2022 - 12:00 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Steve,

In the early production years, the hard rubber butt plate was a $2 extra cost item. In later years (not sure exactly when), it became a no cost optional item.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
cj57
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 426
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
January 15, 2022 - 7:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

In 1896 1/2 mags and SGBs were offered at no cost. When that carbine was made they were no cost options and were some what popular. As to the stock being undersized, it’s been sanded and repaired with a bolt, I wouldn’t imagine replacing a stock with one with a bolt in it, when you could do the same repair to the that was on it. A shame, but that was a common way to repair stocks.

Avatar
cj57
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 426
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
January 15, 2022 - 7:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

FBA6EEBF-0186-44B5-9125-7BE1A8B35715.jpegImage Enlarger

Here he is with a nice buck! LOL That configuration was popular in New England. I’ve seen pics like these and seen a lot of 94s like that hunting in ME and PA, VT

Avatar
Walter Lamon
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 8
Member Since:
November 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
January 15, 2022 - 11:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

What a cool picture. His clothes tell a great story. It is a testimonial to the rifle and many firearms in general. The clothes are gone. The hunter, I presume, is gone but the rifle is a useful tool today. 

Avatar
Henry Mero
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1412
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
January 15, 2022 - 1:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

How many of You gentleman hunters go hunting in a shirt and tie nowadays. Nice picture of one classy dude

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5217
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
January 15, 2022 - 1:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Henry Mero said
How many of You gentleman hunters go hunting in a shirt and tie nowadays. Nice picture of one classy dude  

I suspect he put on his Sunday best for the photo.  Having a photo taken was a big deal back then.

Avatar
bobr94
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 183
Member Since:
April 30, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
January 15, 2022 - 2:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Note the quite rare proofmark forward-of-the-rear-sight. Have you checked for an incorrect patent date? Should be August 21 but could be the rare and incorrect August 14.

B

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 554
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6486
Chuck: 5890
steve004: 5217
1873man: 4706
deerhunter: 2713
Big Larry: 2560
twobit: 2505
mrcvs: 2213
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
Andy
James Luoma
DM2012
redfish282000
MFoster
Daltsav
Monk1950
Redcedar7T
KrzHorse
drjjpdc
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14829
Posts: 132756

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10063
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation