Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester 1886 receiver sight help
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 130
Member Since:
December 29, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
December 27, 2024 - 1:30 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

oh well i’ll hit a home run someday thanks Bert

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 863
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
22
December 28, 2024 - 3:09 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have read this carefully and with great interest as I, as some of you know, am a nut case for 86’s. But I am a bit confused here and I am sure I am about to set straight on this. Bert are you saying that the late model 86’s were D&T for a Lyman 56? Because this thread stirred my mind I just dragged out my latest model 86, Ser# 159818 and it does not have mounting holes for a 56 lyman. Obviously this gun wont letter. But it does have a NI coded 38 lyman. Can it be implied the current sight is factory ordered and they (Winchester) opted to not D&T for a 56? 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12499
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
23
December 28, 2024 - 5:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

oldcrankyyankee said
I have read this carefully and with great interest as I, as some of you know, am a nut case for 86’s. But I am a bit confused here and I am sure I am about to set straight on this. Bert are you saying that the late model 86’s were D&T for a Lyman 56? Because this thread stirred my mind I just dragged out my latest model 86, Ser# 159818 and it does not have mounting holes for a 56 lyman. Obviously this gun wont letter. But it does have a NI coded 38 lyman. Can it be implied the current sight is factory ordered and they (Winchester) opted to not D&T for a 56? 

  

Tom,

A late production Model 86 could have been special ordered with a Lyman No. 56.  It was never a standard feature.  The very small number that do exist were very late production 33 WCF rifles with a PROOF STEEL barrel and ramp front sight.

In the case of your late production Model 86, does it have a barrel mounted rear sight, or does it have a blank piece or no dovetail at all?  Which type upper tang marking does it have?

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 863
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
24
December 28, 2024 - 1:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

oldcrankyyankee said

I have read this carefully and with great interest as I, as some of you know, am a nut case for 86’s. But I am a bit confused here and I am sure I am about to set straight on this. Bert are you saying that the late model 86’s were D&T for a Lyman 56? Because this thread stirred my mind I just dragged out my latest model 86, Ser# 159818 and it does not have mounting holes for a 56 lyman. Obviously this gun wont letter. But it does have a NI coded 38 lyman. Can it be implied the current sight is factory ordered and they (Winchester) opted to not D&T for a 56? 

  

Tom,

A late production Model 86 could have been special ordered with a Lyman No. 56.  It was never a standard feature.  The very small number that do exist were very late production 33 WCF rifles with a PROOF STEEL barrel and ramp front sight.

In the case of your late production Model 86, does it have a barrel mounted rear sight, or does it have a blank piece or no dovetail at all?  Which type upper tang marking does it have?

Bert

  

Bert, it has type 4 upper tang marking (Madl). Blank in rear sight dovetail, but shows evidence of previously having a sight there, small rub line from an elevator. Has nickel steel barrel. Barrel date is 29. Thanks for clarifying about the 56 sights tho.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12499
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
25
December 28, 2024 - 6:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Tom,

Type 4 marking

Type-4-Tang-marking-Model-86.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Type 5 marking

Type-5-Tang-marking-159067-A.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Have you ever removed the Lyman No. 38 to inspect the drilled & tapped holes use to mount it?  

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 863
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
26
December 28, 2024 - 9:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
Tom,

Type 4 marking

Type-4-Tang-marking-Model-86.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Type 5 marking

Type-5-Tang-marking-159067-A.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Have you ever removed the Lyman No. 38 to inspect the drilled & tapped holes use to mount it?  

Bert

  

I have not done that to the gun in question. I will say the Tang marking is type 5 according to your pictures, I was referencing page 32 of John’s latest book which he has listed as picture “E”. Type 4 from sn 158000 to EOP.  His pictures are some times hard to see. 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12499
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
27
December 28, 2024 - 11:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Just to clarify my assertion of the upper tang marking types;

Type 1 marking

Type-1-Tang-marking-130503.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Type 2 marking

Type-2-Tang-marking-138951.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Type 3 marking

Type-3-Tang-marking-152784.jpgImage Enlarger

 

 

Type 4 marking

Type-4-Tang-marking-Model-86-1.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Type 5 marking

Type-5-Tang-marking-159067-A-1.jpgImage Enlarger

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4987
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
28
December 29, 2024 - 12:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I’ve never seen an ’86 with the Lyman receiver sight described.  There must not be many out there.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 863
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
29
December 29, 2024 - 1:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
Tom,

Type 4 marking

Type-4-Tang-marking-Model-86.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Type 5 marking

Type-5-Tang-marking-159067-A.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Have you ever removed the Lyman No. 38 to inspect the frilled & tapped holes use to mount it?  

Bert

  

Bert i took the sight off this morning and is definitely not factory. The blacksmith that did it didn’t even debur the hole for the pivot screw. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 863
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
30
December 29, 2024 - 1:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said
I’ve never seen an ’86 with the Lyman receiver sight described.  There must not be many out there.

  

Steve  I’m certainly not an expert but this is the only one I have here and only one I’ve seen. But I also don’t know when the 38 came into existence. Like I said it is code marked NI, so definitely  during the advent of our beloved 33 WCF. I think they may get confused with the 21 Lyman quite a bit by the unknowing. I would add that if anyone out there has quality up close pictures of one, I would love to see them. I think mine may be missing a spring washer for the windage screw, mine is way to easy to turn and lacks any friction so the aperture will go off zero when firing.  

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 863
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
31
December 29, 2024 - 1:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
Just to clarify my assertion of the upper tang marking types;

Type 1 marking

Type-1-Tang-marking-130503.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Type 2 marking

Type-2-Tang-marking-138951.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Type 3 marking

Type-3-Tang-marking-152784.jpgImage Enlarger

 

 

Type 4 marking

Type-4-Tang-marking-Model-86-1.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Type 5 marking

Type-5-Tang-marking-159067-A-1.jpgImage Enlarger

  

Bert, I see the difference, In John’s book he lists the type 3 in 2 variants. First is with 1886. second variant type 3 is only 86, same as your type 4. Then his type 4 is your type 5 with the 1886/86 eliminated from the tang and stamped on the barrel. Hence I called mine a type 4. 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12499
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
32
December 29, 2024 - 6:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said
I’ve never seen an ’86 with the Lyman receiver sight described.  There must not be many out there.

That is a true statement.  How many have you seen with a Proof Steel barrel?

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 404
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
33
December 30, 2024 - 2:09 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Tom is this what you need IMG_8223.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_8222.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_8221.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_4853.jpegImage EnlargerI have three of these model 38 sights and they don’t appear to have a spring on the windage screw

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 863
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
34
December 31, 2024 - 10:33 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

cj57 said
Tom is this what you need IMG_8223.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_8222.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_8221.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_4853.jpegImage EnlargerI have three of these model 38 sights and they don’t appear to have a spring on the windage screw

  

Thank you, just what I was looking for…

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4987
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
35
January 1, 2025 - 2:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

It would be interesting to see photos of a late M1886 with a factory mounted Lyman No. 56.  I am assuming such a rifle would have a ramp front sight?

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 863
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
36
January 1, 2025 - 3:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Steve we clearly are mentally connected, I was thinking the same thing re reading this today. I actually did see one for sale but it wasn’t a late model. In fact it was case color and made well before the 56 was available, Bubba had done it. But if in fact a having one with a 38 is not to common I would suggest having one with a factory installed 56 would be even cooler.Cool   

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12499
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
37
January 1, 2025 - 6:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said
It would be interesting to see photos of a late M1886 with a factory mounted Lyman No. 56.  I am assuming such a rifle would have a ramp front sight?

  

Yes, and a Proof Steel marked barrel.  Unfortunately, I did not get a picture of the sight on the rifle when I recorded it in my research notes.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6109
Chuck: 5562
steve004: 4987
1873man: 4639
Big Larry: 2500
twobit: 2470
mrcvs: 2111
Maverick: 1903
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14347
Posts: 127507

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2012
Members: 9739
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation