Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester 1886 chambered in .348?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Northwestern Ontario
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 303
Member Since:
December 14, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 24, 2018 - 5:09 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

i am communicating with a seller of what he describes as a Winchester M1886 chambered in .348WCF. He claims that between 800 to 1000 “reinforced 1886” receivers were chambered in .348 prior to the introduction of the Model 71. Is this true? I have asked for photos.

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4671
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 24, 2018 - 5:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

According to Winchester ledgers there was no 348 caliber in the 86. There is a gap in the 86 ledger from 1909 to 1911 but the 71 can out in 1935 and I have never heard of a 348 in a 86.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12700
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 24, 2018 - 5:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Dave Kenney said
i am communicating with a seller of what he describes as a Winchester M1886 chambered in .348WCF. He claims that between 800 to 1000 “reinforced 1886” receivers were chambered in .348 prior to the introduction of the Model 71. Is this true? I have asked for photos.  

No, that is definitely not true.  The Model 1886 was discontinued in 1928, with a small number of parts clean-up rifles manufactured into the early 1930s.  The receiver frames were made using forged & milled nickel steel.  When the Model 71 was introduced in late 1935, the receiver frame was made using Proof Steel.  In the ongoing survey of the late production Model 1886s (the last 14,000 serial numbers), the majority of them were made in the 33 WCF caliber, and none have been found in the 348 WCF cartridge.  I would very much like to know more about this alleged Model 1886 made in .348.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 352
Member Since:
January 24, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 24, 2018 - 11:52 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Talking with John Madl, I remember him telling me that a few of the very first 71s were actually made from 86 frames, but I’ve slept since then..so I might be mis-remembering.  You can always give John a call.

Respectfully

 

Mike

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 887
Member Since:
March 23, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
December 24, 2018 - 1:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

 Interesting subject.Recently saw one listed on a gun site.Perhaps the same rifle that started this thread?Smile

Avatar
Northwestern Ontario
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 303
Member Since:
December 14, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
December 24, 2018 - 2:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

No, that is definitely not true.  The Model 1886 was discontinued in 1928, with a small number of parts clean-up rifles manufactured into the early 1930s.  The receiver frames were made using forged & milled nickel steel.  When the Model 71 was introduced in late 1935, the receiver frame was made using Proof Steel.  In the ongoing survey of the late production Model 1886s (the last 14,000 serial numbers), the majority of them were made in the 33 WCF caliber, and none have been found in the 348 WCF cartridge.  I would very much like to know more about this alleged Model 1886 made in .348.

Bert  

Bert and others, When I get the pictures I will email them to you. It seems to be a strange rifle for sure. The owner states that the barrel is marked 71/348? I suspect it is a Frankinchester.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5680
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
December 24, 2018 - 6:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

There are long tang 348’s and short tang 348’s.  I believe the early guns may have used the same receiver that the 86’s used.  Of course they were newly made and there may be some differences.  Never owned one.  My guess is that a 348 barrel would easily fit an 86 receiver and vice versa?

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12700
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
December 24, 2018 - 8:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

While the Model 1886 and Model 71 may appears to be the same externally, internally they were significantly different.  The first difference was the steel alloy used to make the receiver frame.  Winchester specifically stated in their early catalogs that the receiver frame on the Model 71 was improved and used Winchester Proof Steel.  The second notable change was the use of a coil-spring driven hammer versus the old style flat-spring used on the Model 1886.

I suspect that the rifle in question is a Model 1886 with a Model 71 barrel fitted to it…

Bert

 

Model 71 receiver & lower tang…Hammer-Spring.jpgImage Enlarger 

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Ed Hilbert
Guest
WACA Guest
9
April 23, 2019 - 2:27 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hi – I am not involved in any way with this particular item other than the fact that I own a 1886 frame Winchester chambered in .348,,,,, I always assumed it had been re-barreled at some point, the serial number on the frame shows it is a 1890 (year built) rifle, unless I can’t see a worn # 1 in front of the visible numbers in which case it would date the build of the gun to 1907.   I am also aware of another 1886 with a .348 barrel on it…… My gun’s barrel says model 71 .348 …my gun frame says model 1886….thus my assumption it had been re-barreled…? 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12700
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
April 23, 2019 - 3:36 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hello Ed,

Your Model 1886 has positively been rebarreled. Further, I would be very cautious about shooting it. The Model 1886 receiver frames were not made out of a suitable alloy steel for the 348 WCF cartridge. The Model 71 receiver frames were made using Winchester Proof Steel (chrome-moly).

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: TR, Bryan Austin, [email protected], Pwog, Bo Rich
Guest(s) 237
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6249
Chuck: 5680
steve004: 5067
1873man: 4671
Big Larry: 2519
twobit: 2487
mrcvs: 2154
Maverick: 1989
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14537
Posts: 129599

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2034
Members: 9855
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation