Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Why would they pay more for octagon?
Avatar
helidriver72
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 53
Member Since:
December 9, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 10, 2025 - 8:21 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

So why would someone in the late 1800’s pay more for an octagon barrel when they could get a round barrel thats lighter for less money?

Was it because they wanted a little more weight? Did they think it looked better? Was more accurate? A holdover style preference from the Kentucky rifle days?

I’m sure someone here has the stats on round vs octagon numbers.

Thanks !

Avatar
426crown
Taos NM
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 387
Member Since:
October 29, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 10, 2025 - 11:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I think round barrels cost more, but I may be wrong. I prefer Winchesters with CB and OB, but will buy a part Octagon.

The extrusion was Octagon and then had to be milled.

Avatar
Anthony
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1197
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 10, 2025 - 1:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I agree with 426crown, as the round barrel cost more. I think we also have to remember the times way back when, Winchesters were still kinda new on the scenes, as 1866 was they’re first Winchester rifle bearing the name. Most gun owners we’re still in possession of octagon barrelled muzzle loaders, more so than the round made Fowler, shot gun type rifles, from various entities. Even with various other manufacturers on the market who made similar rifles of various designs, as they all we’re paying attention to what the other guy was making.

The people of those early days thought differently than we do today. Different times, as many had to learn the balance of the weight distribution of a round barrel vs. an octagon barrel, and like crown said, even better so a half round barrel, balanced even better. 

I think it’s mainly a time learning experience, as firearms surly have come a long way.

 

Anthony

Avatar
Henry Mero
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1467
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 10, 2025 - 1:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

OK ; so in 1903 a model 1894 , 26 “oct. bbl. or 1/2 oct. bbl. cost $19.50 , and a round bbl. cost $18.00. I will take a dozen of each pleaseWink. Why are they more money now, I guess to most collector folks they are more asthecically pleasing to the eye.

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4775
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
December 10, 2025 - 2:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

In the 73’s the percentage between the octagon and round barrel is 71.4% octagon. It was a preference of the people buying the guns back then that the octagon was believed to be better. I don’t know if there was a accuracy difference between them. Collectors now still prefer the octagon as it looks like the old guns where the round barrel looks more modern. There are collectors for every type of gun but just more collectors want octagon so the prices reflect it. If your a collector of round barrels you have a advantage in buying the them. 

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13442
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
December 10, 2025 - 3:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

426crown said
I think round barrels cost more, but I may be wrong. I prefer Winchesters with CB and OB, but will buy a part Octagon.
The extrusion was Octagon and then had to be milled.
  

Nope… it was the opposite.  An octagon barrel always cost more than a round barrel. The attached pictures are scanned copies of an original Winchester catalog. The octagon (and half-octagon) barrel option was $1.50 extra for the lever-action models, and $.50 more for the Single Shot. 

For the two models that I have studied & researched in great depth, the octagon barrels were much more common.  For the Single Shot model, octagon (including half-octagon) barrels comprised 85.35% of the total production through the year 1910.  For the Model 1894 Rifles, approximately 70% were manufactured with an octagon or half-octagon barrel.  I suspect that the ratios for the 1873, 1886, and 1892 were very similar to the Model 1894.

Barrel-costs-Model-1873.jpgImage Enlarger

Barrel-costs-Model-1886.jpgImage Enlarger
Barrel-costs-Model-1892.jpgImage Enlarger
Barrel-costs-Model-1894.jpgImage Enlarger
Barrel-costs-Model-1895.jpgImage Enlarger
Barrel-costs-Single-Shot.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
86Win
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 338
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
December 10, 2025 - 4:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Could it be octagon might be considered stronger? More mass than round and ridges to induce strength, like car bodies have do. Don

Avatar
Anthony
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1197
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
December 10, 2025 - 6:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said

426crown said
I think round barrels cost more, but I may be wrong. I prefer Winchesters with CB and OB, but will buy a part Octagon.
The extrusion was Octagon and then had to be milled.
  

Nope… it was the opposite.  An octagon barrel always cost more than a round barrel. The attached pictures are scanned copies of an original Winchester catalog. The octagon (and half-octagon) barrel option was $1.50 extra for the lever-action models, and $.50 more for the Single Shot. 
For the two models that I have studied & researched in great depth, the octagon barrels were much more common.  For the Single Shot model, octagon (including half-octagon) barrels comprised 85.35% of the total production through the year 1910.  For the Model 1894 Rifles, approximately 70% were manufactured with an octagon or half-octagon barrel.  I suspect that the ratios for the 1873, 1886, and 1892 were very similar to the Model 1894.

 
Bert
  

Thanks Bert,

I didn’t realize that. It’s good you we’re able to provide the scanned documents verifying some of your research.

Anthony

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13442
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
December 10, 2025 - 6:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

86Win said
Could it be octagon might be considered stronger? More mass than round and ridges to induce strength, like car bodies have do. Don
  

I believe that is what people believed back in the day.  In truth, it is simply an urban myth.

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6101
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
December 10, 2025 - 6:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Back in the day or today an octagon barrel, full mag and a rifle butt will bring more money than a round barrel.  Assuming all other things are the same. 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: oliver, D. T. PETERSON, Lawrence Clarey, btbell, [email protected], Rick C, Jeremy P, fordwannabe
Guest(s) 465
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6766
Chuck: 6101
steve004: 5323
1873man: 4775
deerhunter: 2782
Big Larry: 2578
twobit: 2561
mrcvs: 2285
Maverick: 2080
Newest Members:
Morg1960
Centennialrifle
fordwannabe
Chip
Bowhunter1965
wjs_vienna
Mountain guy
jk3hunter
TheFultz
Longboard
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15153
Posts: 136376

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10268
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation