Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
When was the 1895 made in 30-03?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Maine
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 735
Member Since:
March 14, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
April 14, 2025 - 5:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thank you the reply Tim. Would love to see pics of the the deluxe factory engraved in .30-03 someday. 

 Rick C 

   

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 790
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
22
April 14, 2025 - 7:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Rick, it will be at Cody this July.  I will have 4 rather interesting models 1895 there for perusal and discussion, but not for sale.  BTW, it was made in 1912, so the .30-06 had been out for a while by then.  Tim

Avatar
Winchester, VA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1191
Member Since:
November 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
23
April 14, 2025 - 8:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

I know this is an OLD thread and my comments here are off topic… But it’s come up a few times before and this might be entertaining… Laugh  Regarding Bert’s comment from a DECADE ago that some Model 70s were manufactured in 30-03…  Each time this has come up on the Forum we’ve asked whether the under barrel was stamped “1906” (Winchester’s designation for 30 GOV’T”06) and nobody replied…

Well…  In the survey I now have (5) Model 70s recorded that are/were thought to be in 30-03…  The serial numbers are 87231, 88798, 89403, 89723, and 90611 (all 1948).  Here’s an example on one of the confusing caliber stamps…

30-GOVT03-stamp-copy.jpgImage Enlarger

Using the naked (and possibly “hopeful”) eye, and without magnification, one could easily (even “honestly”) think this is stamped “30 GOV’T’03”. To me it looks like a “30 GOV’T’06” caliber stamp with a chip in the “6” that makes it look like a “3”.  So I took one of my Model 70 30-06 Target rifles in this serial number range (s/n 87131) and tried my best to duplicate the angle of the above photo.  Then I made a “false color” overlay using Photoshop.  In this photo, 87131 is on top in red, and the suspect 30 GOV’T’03 is in the middle in green.  Overlay on the bottom…

30-06-versus-30-03-overlay.jpgImage Enlarger

What do you think??? LaughWinkConfused I have a couple other photos of alleged 30-03 barrel markings and they all have the same chip in the same place.  They’re just not as sharp as the one I used for my “experiment”…  Four of the (5) I’ve recorded with this marking were advertised as “rare” Model 70s in 30-03, the other was advertised (correctly) as a 30-06.  BTW… I got the photo of the “30 GOV’T’03” stamp from Pre64win.com, and to their credit they didn’t think it was “real” either… 

So I have yet to encounter a M70 in 30-03 and am inclined to think they don’t exist…  I believe that there was one batch of M70 barrels stamped in 1948 with a worn out (chipped) die that wasn’t replaced soon enough…

Hummm…

Lou

WACA 9519; Studying Pre-64 Model 70 Winchesters

WACA-Signauture-3.jpg

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12457
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
24
April 14, 2025 - 8:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Louis Luttrell said
I know this is an OLD thread and my comments here are off topic… But it’s come up a few times before and this might be entertaining… Laugh  Regarding Bert’s comment from a DECADE ago that some Model 70s were manufactured in 30-03…  Each time this has come up on the Forum we’ve asked whether the under barrel was stamped “1906” (Winchester’s designation for 30 GOV’T”06) and nobody replied…

Well…  In the survey I now have (4) Model 70s recorded that are/were thought to be in 30-03…  The serial numbers are 87231, 88798, 89403, and 90611 (all 1948).  Here’s an example on one of the confusing caliber stamps…

30-GOVT03-stamp-copy.jpgImage Enlarger

Using the naked (and possibly “hopeful”) eye, and without magnification, one could easily (even “honestly”) think this is stamped “30 GOV’T’03”. To me it looks like a “30 GOV’T’06” caliber stamp with a chip in the “6” that makes it look like a “3”.  So I took one of my Model 70 30-06 Target rifles in this serial number range (s/n 87131) and tried my best to duplicate the angle of the above photo.  Then I made a “false color” overlay using Photoshop.  In this photo, 87131 is on top in red, and the suspect 30 GOV’T’03 is in the middle in green.  Overlay on the bottom…

30-06-versus-30-03-overlay.jpgImage Enlarger

What do you think??? LaughWinkConfused I have a couple other photos of alleged 30-03 barrel markings and they all have the same chip in the same place.  They’re just not as sharp as the one I used for my “experiment”…  Three of the (4) I’ve recorded with this marking were advertised as “rare” Model 70s in 30-03, the other was advertised (correctly) as a 30-06.  BTW… I got the photo of the “30 GOV’T’03” stamp from Pre64win.com, and to their credit they didn’t think it was “real” either… 

So I have yet to encounter a M70 in 30-03 and am inclined to think they don’t exist…  I believe that there was one batch of M70 barrels stamped in 1948 with a worn out (chipped) die that wasn’t replaced soon enough…

Hummm…

Lou  

Certainly plausible, and it makes sense.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Maine
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 735
Member Since:
March 14, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
25
April 14, 2025 - 8:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Louis Luttrell said

Well…  In the survey I now have (4) Model 70s recorded that are/were thought to be in 30-03…  The serial numbers are 87231, 88798, 89403, and 90611 (all 1948).  Here’s an example on one of the confusing caliber stamps…

30-GOVT03-stamp-copy.jpgImage Enlarger

Using the naked (and possibly “hopeful”) eye, and without magnification, one could easily (even “honestly”) think this is stamped “30 GOV’T’03”. To me it looks like a “30 GOV’T’06” caliber stamp with a chip in the “6” that makes it look like a “3”.  So I took one of my Model 70 30-06 Target rifles in this serial number range (s/n 87131) and tried my best to duplicate the angle of the above photo.  Then I made a “false color” overlay using Photoshop.  In this photo, 87131 is on top in red, and the suspect 30 GOV’T’03 is in the middle in green.  Overlay on the bottom…

30-06-versus-30-03-overlay.jpgImage Enlarger

What do you think??? LaughWinkConfused I have a couple other photos of alleged 30-03 barrel markings and they all have the same chip in the same place.  They’re just not as sharp as the one I used for my “experiment”…  Three of the (4) I’ve recorded with this marking were advertised as “rare” Model 70s in 30-03, the other was advertised (correctly) as a 30-06.  BTW… I got the photo of the “30 GOV’T’03” stamp from Pre64win.com, and to their credit they didn’t think it was “real” either… 

So I have yet to encounter a M70 in 30-03 and am inclined to think they don’t exist…  I believe that there was one batch of M70 barrels stamped in 1948 with a worn out (chipped) die that wasn’t replaced soon enough…

Hummm…

Lou

  

Very interesting Lou and appreciate you taking the time to post this. Like Bert, I have to agree it’s very plausible and after viewing the photos several times, imo it’s definitely a 6 with a chip missing out of it. I seem to have a niche for bringing up old post, but when I’m searching for information in the forum or online, sometimes this is what occurs.

 Rick C 

   

Avatar
Winchester, VA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1191
Member Since:
November 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
26
April 14, 2025 - 9:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hi Rick and Bert-

I did that photo experiment some years ago when Justin Hale and I were puzzling over that weird stamp on the gun Pre64win had…  Was just waiting in case the issue of M70s in 30-03 came up again…  Here’s another image I made at the time, which I’m putting up b/c it shows one more alleged ’03 stamp (s/n 89723).  The “clean” caliber stamp from 87131 on top, then (2) questionable “30 GOV’T’03” stamps, and at the bottom an image of the 87131 stamp on which I “created” a chip in Photoshop…

30-06-versus-30-03-stamps.jpgImage Enlarger

And one more, s/n 88798…  This one’s struck a little deeper and doesn’t look as much like an “03” but IMHO it’s the same die…  Dave Morris (Frontier Guns) had this gun and advertised/sold it correctly as a 30 GOV’T’06… 

88798-.pngImage Enlarger

I’ll stop hijacking the thread now!!!  Laugh  Sorry!!! Embarassed

Lou 

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

WACA 9519; Studying Pre-64 Model 70 Winchesters

WACA-Signauture-3.jpg

Avatar
Ohio
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 99
Member Since:
August 8, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
27
April 14, 2025 - 9:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

At the OGCA show last year in Medina I examined a Pre 64 Model 70 that looked to be marked .30Gov’t03.  I asked them if they have looked at the under barrel for markings.  I was told that they have not.  I gave them my phone number, and asked them to call me after they checked it.  Not surprising I did not get a call.  I am positive that it is a .30Gov’06 that was stuck with a damaged die.  I also believe that the Model 70 was never chambered in the non-cataloged .30’03.  

Avatar
Winchester, VA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1191
Member Since:
November 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
28
April 14, 2025 - 10:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hi Bob-

Did you happen to write down the serial number?  My “hypothesis” above would suggest it would be in the 87000 to 90000 range, so you potentially could shoot me down…  All theories are good until they are disproved by fact… 

My guess is that there could be 50-100+ (maybe a lot more) 30 GOV’T’06 barrels out there marked with that  “’03” die.  Help!!!

Lou

WACA 9519; Studying Pre-64 Model 70 Winchesters

WACA-Signauture-3.jpg

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6099
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
29
April 15, 2025 - 12:03 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Rather unfortunate place for a broken die but that explanation combined with good photos makes more sense than a Model 70 in 30-03.

 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Ohio
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 99
Member Since:
August 8, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30
April 15, 2025 - 12:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Louis,  I don’t think that I kept the Serial Number, after I was not contacted from them.  I do remember that when I first saw the rifle I thought that it was odd since the serial number placed the rifle being made in the late 1940s.  So, it is very likely to be in the serial number range that you have stated 87000 to 90000.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 219
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6099
Chuck: 5536
steve004: 4974
1873man: 4632
Big Larry: 2500
twobit: 2459
mrcvs: 2104
Maverick: 1883
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14329
Posts: 127240

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2009
Members: 9735
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation