Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
What features denote a musket?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4261
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
21
May 28, 2021 - 10:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

  But there were many weekly publications devoted to hunting & fishing, such as Forest & Stream (estab. 1873), Rod & Gun, Shooting & Fishing, American Field, etc.  The “Wild West” was a subject of great interest to people in the East, & folks interested in western hunting trips could inform themselves of conditions without great difficulty.   

It’s really not important.  This rifle doesn’t need a story to have appeal.  Plus, it’s not purported to have actually gone buffalo hunting anyway.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 561
Member Since:
April 1, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
22
May 29, 2021 - 12:00 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Henry said
He must have been a big man to think He was going to carry that thing all day. It must weigh near 20 lbs. Beautiful and unique piece, keep it safe  

Serial # 51307, is pictured in the Winchester Book and noted as being “a shade under fourteen pounds”. It has a straight grip stock. Another one, serial #125199 is also in the Madis book – it has the PG stock. Both guns in the Madis book have double barrel bands as does the gun shown in this post – neither of the guns in the Madis book note the caliber. There is a third one in the Madis Book, no caliber noted, which has a 36″ barrel with a rapid taper design which the book says weighs close to 10 pounds – it is noted as also having the double barrel bands. Very rare gun indeed – I have never held one – just seen photos. I too would like to see some more good photos of the gun in this post.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 482
Member Since:
March 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
23
May 29, 2021 - 12:44 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Henry said
He must have been a big man to think He was going to carry that thing all day. It must weigh near 20 lbs. Beautiful and unique piece, keep it safe  

 

Yep, I have a 1885 with a #3 30″ barrel and that is front heavy, can’t imagine how front heavy this 1886 must be.  A very special Winchester for sure. 

20170424_163442_resized_2.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

IMG_0805-Copy-Copy-Copy.JPG

Winchester Model 1873 44-40 circa 1886

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4261
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
24
May 29, 2021 - 1:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Kevin Jones said

 

Yep, I have a 1885 with a #3 30″ barrel and that is front heavy, can’t imagine how front heavy this 1886 must be.  A very special Winchester for sure. 

20170424_163442_resized_2.jpgImage Enlarger  

And imagine how heavy it is with .45-90 cartridges filled from one end of the magazine tube to the other. I wonder if that has ever happened with this rifle?  

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 482
Member Since:
March 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
25
May 29, 2021 - 2:05 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said

And imagine how heavy it is with .45-90 cartridges filled from one end of the magazine tube to the other. I wonder if that has ever happened with this rifle?    

Good point, I hadn’t even considered the cartridges, 45-90s have a little heft to them. 

IMG_0805-Copy-Copy-Copy.JPG

Winchester Model 1873 44-40 circa 1886

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 9
Member Since:
May 27, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
26
May 29, 2021 - 2:25 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

DSC01632.JPGImage Enlarger1886-winchester-2.JPGImage EnlargerDSC01629.JPGImage EnlargerDSC01630.JPGImage EnlargerDSC01636.JPGImage EnlargerDSC01637.JPGImage EnlargerHere are a few more, kinda having trouble uploading them. I’ll try to take some with an actual camera instead of old phone photos.

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4261
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
27
May 29, 2021 - 2:33 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for posting the additional photos.  Interesting.  There was no consistent pattern with which Winchester ascribed barrels as “heavy” and, “extra heavy.”  

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 9
Member Since:
May 27, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
28
May 29, 2021 - 2:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I bet you’d think it was extra heavy after carrying it for a day.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4261
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
29
May 29, 2021 - 2:40 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Frederick Cox said
I bet you’d think it was extra heavy after carrying it for a day.  

Oh, I am sure you’re right.  Particularly if it was filled with cartridges.  I was just making reference to the fact that some “extra heavy barrels” are even larger than the barrel on your rifle.

Avatar
Montana
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 647
Member Since:
November 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30
May 29, 2021 - 3:23 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Frederick,  everything about your rifle is spectacular.  A wonderful family heirloom.  Just proves the fact that there are still some great closet guns out there.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1725
Member Since:
June 4, 2017
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
31
May 29, 2021 - 4:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

 It is my opinion that on a letter heavy or extra heavy describe the same barrel weight in general, it’s just how many words the clerk wrote in the ledger. In the catalogues during the period of these early 86’s they only listed extra heavy. The only statement in the catalogue was, “Extra heavy barrels on Repeating Rifles, round or octagon, increasing the weight of the gun from one to two pounds, can be furnished at an additional cost of $4.00.” That said, some barrels were made so large that they were larger than the receivers. Some of these guns lettered by the pound like a Sharps, others didn’t. The actual weight of these barrels depended on size, length, and bore size.  Winchester’s that letter by the pound or are so large that they over shadow the receiver were in my opinion made to a customers spec. not a normal extra.  

 Thank you Frederick for sharing the pictures of such a rare and beautiful heavy barrel gun. T/R

Avatar
South Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1042
Member Since:
March 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
32
May 29, 2021 - 6:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Great looking rifle there Frederick.  Those extra long and extra heavy barrel rifles are super nice and one of my favorites. 

I came across an 1886 at the Texas Gun Collectors Show last month that was a deluxe, H-checked pistol grip, plain trigger, with 34″ octagon barrel (56135).  Cant remember if it was a 45-70 or 45-90 at the moment.  The old boy also had an 1894 with button magazine and 30″ octagon barrel in 38-55, what an oddball looking gun.  Would venture to guess there arent many of those out there.  Had he scaled the price back considerably I would have been willing to take the 1894 home.  I needed mailbox money to even begin to consider the price tag on the 1886.  

DSC_0245-Copy-3.JPG

1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member

"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4261
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
33
May 29, 2021 - 1:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1892takedown said
Great looking rifle there Frederick.  Those extra long and extra heavy barrel rifles are super nice and one of my favorites. 

I came across an 1886 at the Texas Gun Collectors Show last month that was a deluxe, H-checked pistol grip, plain trigger, with 34″ octagon barrel (56135).  Cant remember if it was a 45-70 or 45-90 at the moment.  The old boy also had an 1894 with button magazine and 30″ octagon barrel in 38-55, what an oddball looking gun.  Would venture to guess there arent many of those out there.  Had he scaled the price back considerably I would have been willing to take the 1894 home.  I needed mailbox money to even begin to consider the price tag on the 1886.    

That ’86 you ran into sure sounds appealing.  We know there were less 34 inch barrels made than 36 inch barrels.

Avatar
Eastern Iowa
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 272
Member Since:
February 22, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
34
May 29, 2021 - 5:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

That sure is a nice old rifle!

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: steve004, antler1, TR, Paul K
Guest(s) 328
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6385
TXGunNut: 5054
Chuck: 4600
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2348
twobit: 2303
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12783
Posts: 111350

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8869
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation