Forum -

What a shame...

deerhunter

Troutdale, OR

Member

WACA Member

Forum Posts: 2694

Member Since:
June 26, 2013

Offline

March 1, 2018 - 2:17 am

…if this truly is serial number 62 model 1892. I admit I’ve never been a fan of restored guns…

http://www.gunsinternational.com/guns-for-sale-online/rifles/winchester-rifles-antique-lever/winchester-model-1892-first-year-production-44-wcf.cfm?gun_id=100996288

Don

TXGunNut

Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess

Member

WACA Member

Forum Posts: 6408

Member Since:
November 7, 2015

Offline

March 1, 2018 - 2:56 am

I guess we’ll never know what it looked like before it was restored but from what I can see the restoration was nicely done. I suspect the wood was replaced, not refinished. I don’t have a problem with someone restoring a gun that has been badly abused and has little or no collector value.

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA

BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member

Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe

I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove

Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut

Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut

win4575

Montana

Member

WACA Member

Forum Posts: 698

Member Since:
November 2, 2009

Offline

March 1, 2018 - 3:53 am

Seems a little odd to me, that they didn’t show a photo of the serial number or a Cody letter.

clarence

Member

Restricted

Forum Posts: 7119

Member Since:
November 1, 2013

Offline

March 1, 2018 - 4:49 am

TXGunNut said
I don’t have a problem with someone restoring a gun that has been badly abused and has little or no collector value.

Well, let’s hope this one fell into that category…as opposed to a decent honest gun that showed its age & history; history of this one has been wiped clean.

Correct front sight would help.

tionesta1

Member

WACA Member

Forum Posts: 1525

Member Since:
July 8, 2012

Offline

March 1, 2018 - 1:10 pm

If you go to Cabelas Glendale Gun Library web site and look for Winchester, you will see this gun, and the Cody letter. It was originally an Octagon barrel, then sent back to WRA and changed to round barrel. No mention of the half mag.

Here’s the link:

https://www.cabelas.com/product/gun-library/glendale-gun-library%7C/pc/103792680/c/105934680/winchester-model-1892-first-year-production-44-wcf/2748518.uts?destination=%2Fcatalog%2Fbrowse%2Fglendale-gun-library%2F_%2FN-1103649%2FNs-PRODUCT_NAME%257C1%3FWTz_stype%3DGNU

Does anyone know what the earliest known model 1892 still in existence is?

dane62

Aroostook County Maine

Member

WACA Guest

Forum Posts: 330

Member Since:
April 20, 2011

Offline

March 1, 2018 - 1:40 pm

Al,

Serial number 1 sold a few years ago at Amoskeag auction. I think remember seeing number 2 on the internet as well.

Dana

twobit

Member

WACA Member

Forum Posts: 2493

Member Since:
March 20, 2009

Offline

March 1, 2018 - 8:56 pm

I have seen #1, 27, 29, 63, 65, 76 and 99 as the earliest ones still around.

Michael

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Kevin Jones

Member

WACA Guest

Forum Posts: 482

Member Since:
March 21, 2016

Offline

March 3, 2018 - 11:07 am

TXGunNut said
I guess we’ll never know what it looked like before it was restored but from what I can see the restoration was nicely done. I suspect the wood was replaced, not refinished. I don’t have a problem with someone restoring a gun that has been badly abused and has little or no collector value.

I agree! A beautiful and significant 1892 for sure. Perhaps not a bad price considering; for someone who doesn’t value originally a great deal.

Winchester Model 1873 44-40 circa 1886

What a shame...|Winchester Rifles|Forum|Winchester Collector