Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Were Win model 1895's Ever Drilled and Tapped for a Tang Sight?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 311
Member Since:
December 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 18, 2019 - 12:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Were Win model 1895’s Ever Drilled and Tapped for a Tang Sight?

As did the top tang ever have that front mounting hole?

The geometry of the receiver?  Just curious?  Thanks.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6364
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 18, 2019 - 2:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

jolly bill said

The geometry of the receiver?   

If you mean the length of the bolt travel, I think so.  Would have been more useful to D&T them for the Lyman 21, especially designed for it. 

Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
March 19, 2019 - 12:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

We were fortunate to see a lot of ledger entries while working on the Model 1895 book.  There are notations for tang sights having been installed at the factory, but not very often.  The Marble Special Base sights are one example that was used.  Like Clarence says, the Lyman receiver sights were almost always used when a rear aperture sight was installed.  Lyman patent text and advertising for the Lyman No. 21 mentions the long bolt travel of rifles like the ’95.

I have noticed tang sights on ’95s in old photos more often than I’ve expected and would have to guess that many of those were put on post-factory.  

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 311
Member Since:
December 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
March 20, 2019 - 3:05 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Clarence and Brad;

Thank you for your Replies.  Agreed, the Lyman number 21 seems to be popular on the 1895’s.

Jolly

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4250
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
March 23, 2019 - 1:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I read somewhere in print that 1 in 10 1895’s were factory tapped on the tang for a tang sight.  I have no idea how they came up with this number.  I wonder if there are examples of rifles that were factory tapped but not shipped with a tang sight.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: mrcvs, Shortgrub, morsece, Kris Miller, Blue Ridge Parson
Guest(s) 169
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6364
TXGunNut: 5034
Chuck: 4597
1873man: 4322
steve004: 4250
Big Larry: 2342
twobit: 2295
mrcvs: 1726
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12755
Posts: 111106

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1763
Members: 8850
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation