Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
The amount of refinished fabricated guns is getting old...
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 140
Member Since:
February 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
October 7, 2016 - 3:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for your input Larry. She was up front with me and said she didn’t have an FFL or know a lot about guns. I think she is one of many internet seller with a computer filling a need in her area. I bought my 67 from her knowing there were issues. I believe I have a rifle that some gun smith ( years ago most every area had one) cut down for some one. It’s not something that Winchester made.

Avatar
Santa Clara, CA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 907
Member Since:
January 27, 1992
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
22
October 8, 2016 - 5:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

In monetary terms, when guns are restored is there any general rule as to devaluation?

Some guns are re-blued, while others are restored to original or near original condition.

Restoration can be quite expensive and I see true restorations selling for high amounts.

So doesn’t it, in part, just depend on how a gun is represented? 

I am still getting fooled at times and am very embarrassed to show what I believe to be correct only to be told I have been duped!

Any thoughts?

RDB

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12675
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
23
October 8, 2016 - 7:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Roger,

“Refinished” collectable Winchesters have lost a minimum of 50% of their value, and in some cases, as much as 90% of the value. Properly “Restored” collectable Winchesters lose a lot smaller percentage of their value, but when you factor in the cost for the restoration, in most cases, it is a break-even event, with the only benefit being that the gun is now in much better looking condition. I am a proponent of “restoring” the Winchesters out there that would benefit from it, but only if there is no intent to deceive future owners of said Winchester. When it comes to common Winchesters being “restored” (e.g. a Model 1894 SRC or similar), it is a wasted effort, money, and time in my personal opinion. The only reason I can support for restoring common Winchesters, is to preserve them for future generations within a family that intends to keep them.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2485
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
24
October 10, 2016 - 4:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Rodhartogg said
Gunbroker: 588753490

 

“Estate Gun”

AKA: I am decent at rebluing, roll dies, reproofing, and sanding edges to simulate wear.

 

Lots of this stuff lately…  

This seller has auctioned several reworked Model 61’s in the past few years.  Rifles that have been upgraded to single chamber instead of their previous configuration of standard rifles.  I would be VERY leary!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
New Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
January 6, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
25
October 12, 2016 - 12:29 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

If the seller doesn’t know much about guns she is trying to buy more of them.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Item/586576519

http://www.gunbroker.com/Item/586576519/BidHistory

She was second high bidder on a similar gun that she just sold,but in rough shape.

This was the gun she sold.

 

http://www.gunbroker.com/item/585501705

Avatar
New Mexico
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1167
Member Since:
December 1, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
26
October 12, 2016 - 2:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Great detective work there, Steve.  Sheds some more light on what goes on at GunBroker.

1876-4-1.jpg

"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend." 

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2648
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
27
October 12, 2016 - 5:08 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Here’s another one from the same seller.  The ordinance markings don’t look right to me–at least compared to the ordinance markings on the legit 1894 Spruce guns.  It also seems odd that these markings would be on a model 1903.  I’ve never heard of the U.S. military ever using the model 1903, especially with it’s unique clambering.  My gut points to fake, but I’m no expert on U.S. ordinance markings either.  Seems there are more fakes than authentic pieces when it comes to U.S. ordinance marked anything.  What do others think?

http://www.gunbroker.com/item/590354036

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2648
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
28
October 12, 2016 - 5:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

twobit said

This seller has auctioned several reworked Model 61’s in the past few years.  Rifles that have been upgraded to single chamber instead of their previous configuration of standard rifles.  I would be VERY leary!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Michael  

Here’s another single chamber model 61 from the same seller.  Do you happen to have this one in your survey before it became a single chamber?  Serial number 122064.

http://www.gunbroker.com/item/590369423 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2485
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
29
October 12, 2016 - 11:11 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

deerhunter said

Here’s another single chamber model 61 from the same seller.  Do you happen to have this one in your survey before it became a single chamber?  Serial number 122064.

http://www.gunbroker.com/item/590369423   

That rifle was previously sold on GB out of Millerstown, PA.  I have a note in my spreadsheet that the butt stock was cut down a bit when I saw it in that auction.  I also have SN 122059 in exactly the same configuration as 122064 so I believe the configuration is most likely original but the gun’s condition has definitely been “improved” in this auction.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2648
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30
October 12, 2016 - 2:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

twobit said

That rifle was previously sold on GB out of Millerstown, PA.  I have a note in my spreadsheet that the butt stock was cut down a bit when I saw it in that auction.  I also have SN 122059 in exactly the same configuration as 122064 so I believe the configuration is most likely original but the gun’s condition has definitely been “improved” in this auction.

Michael  

Interesting…the seller obviously knows what she’s doing.  Buying guns with condition issues, restoring them, then passing them on as “original.”  Playing dumb is just a ploy in my opinion. Her claim of “liquidating an estate from a 50+ year collection is a line of B.S.  Surprised she’s not tacking on “original” boxes and crates too.  This seller has been adding to my black list of Gunbroker sellers that I’ll never do business with–right along with “Selling Dad’s Old Guns.”  

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12675
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
31
October 12, 2016 - 3:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

deerhunter said
Here’s another one from the same seller.  The ordinance markings don’t look right to me–at least compared to the ordinance markings on the legit 1894 Spruce guns.  It also seems odd that these markings would be on a model 1903.  I’ve never heard of the U.S. military ever using the model 1903, especially with it’s unique clambering.  My gut points to fake, but I’m no expert on U.S. ordinance markings either.  Seems there are more fakes than authentic pieces when it comes to U.S. ordinance marked anything.  What do others think?

http://www.gunbroker.com/item/590354036  

Don,

The serial number on that Model 1903 is way too early for it to be ordnance marked, and the flaming bomb stamp is very suspect.  Per the PR records, serial number 8441 was the last Model 1903 made in December of 1903, and that rifle is 8315.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2517
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
32
October 12, 2016 - 3:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

deerhunter said
Here’s another one from the same seller.  The ordinance markings don’t look right to me–at least compared to the ordinance markings on the legit 1894 Spruce guns.  It also seems odd that these markings would be on a model 1903.  I’ve never heard of the U.S. military ever using the model 1903, especially with it’s unique clambering.  My gut points to fake, but I’m no expert on U.S. ordinance markings either.  Seems there are more fakes than authentic pieces when it comes to U.S. ordinance marked anything.  What do others think?

http://www.gunbroker.com/item/590354036  

They did in fact stamp some WW1 vintage M03’s with US markings. I had one many years ago. I cannot seem to remember where the ord. marks were. They all had tang sights too. If I remember correctly, they were used in observation balloons. Very scarce if original. I sold mine for $2,500 many years ago. Big Larry

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2648
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
33
October 12, 2016 - 4:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Big Larry said

They did in fact stamp some WW1 vintage M03’s with US markings. I had one many years ago. I cannot seem to remember where the ord. marks were. They all had tang sights too. If I remember correctly, they were used in observation balloons. Very scarce if original. I sold mine for $2,500 many years ago. Big Larry  

That’s interesting.  Seems I learn something new every day on this forum.  Do you know of any references/books that tell about these?

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2648
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
34
October 12, 2016 - 4:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

Don,

The serial number on that Model 1903 is way too early for it to be ordnance marked, and the flaming bomb stamp is very suspect.  Per the PR records, serial number 8441 was the last Model 1903 made in December of 1903, and that rifle is 8315.

Bert  

Thanks Bert.  My dad has a real 1894 Spruce gun (he showed it to you at the OAC show a few years ago) so I know what to look for regarding the flaming bomb stamp.  If this were to be a WWI era stamping, shouldn’t it be the same as the ones on the Spruce guns, or did the U.S. military change their ordinance markings within this time-frame?  I do understand your point regarding the serial number being too early though.

Don

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12675
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
35
October 12, 2016 - 5:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Don,

It has been my observation that the ordnance bomb marking is identical on the Model 1894 Spruce Guns, the Model 1885 Winder Muskets, and the WW I issue Trench Guns. For that reason, I would expect the WW I Model 1903 Rifles to have the exact same flaming ordnance bomb on them.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2648
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
36
October 12, 2016 - 6:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks Bert.  Sounds like another artificially enhanced Winchester…

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6237
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
37
October 13, 2016 - 2:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

deerhunter said

Interesting…the seller obviously knows what she’s doing.  Buying guns with condition issues, restoring them, then passing them on as “original.”  Playing dumb is just a ploy in my opinion. Her claim of “liquidating an estate from a 50+ year collection is a line of B.S.  Surprised she’s not tacking on “original” boxes and crates too.  This seller has been adding to my black list of Gunbroker sellers that I’ll never do business with–right along with “Selling Dad’s Old Guns.”    

I haven’t noticed the issues with the guns that more experienced eyes have caught; my issue is with her “story”. She’s obviously in the business of buying and selling firearms but has no FFL.

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2485
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
38
October 13, 2016 - 3:39 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

TXGunNut said

I haven’t noticed the issues with the guns that more experienced eyes have caught; my issue is with her “story”. She’s obviously in the business of buying and selling firearms but has no FFL.  

TX,

Yes her stories are sensationalized for certain.  You do not need an FFL to either buy or sell guns she only needs to have them delivered to an FFL holder for the buyer.  Though one would think that if that is your business it might make it simpler for her t oreceive firearms but it is still up to the buyer to pick them via an FFL holder.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 463
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
39
October 13, 2016 - 4:18 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

You need an ffl if you are in the business to make money buying & selling.

Avatar
NE OREGON
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 538
Member Since:
July 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
40
October 13, 2016 - 1:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I think sb is correct. This gal is way beyond just casually selling firearms once in awhile. I believe she would come under item # 3 below. I also believe it’s probably BS that she is selling these on consignment, or that the guns are from an estate. Just my opinion. Peter

 

Licensing Requirements (Dealer/Manufacturer/Importer/Exporter):

10. At what point should I obtain a Federal firearms license (FFL)? How do I obtain a FFL?

Federal law requires a Federal firearms license if you are engaged in the business as a firearms dealer, manufacturer or importer. A person is engaged in those businesses, as it applies to each license type, as follows:

1. Manufacturer of firearms a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to manufacturing firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the sale or distribution of the firearms manufactured (18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(21)(A));

2. Manufacturer of ammunition — a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to manufacturing ammunition as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the sale or distribution of the ammunition manufactured (18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(21)(B));

3. Dealer in firearms — a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms, but such term shall not include a person who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms (18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(21)(C));

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Maverick, Green River Gus, Pwog, Snarf
Guest(s) 123
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6237
Chuck: 5668
steve004: 5059
1873man: 4669
Big Larry: 2517
twobit: 2485
mrcvs: 2150
Maverick: 1983
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14508
Posts: 129324

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2030
Members: 9839
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation