Forum -

Stainless or nickel receiver?

Add Reply

Add Topic

nascar fan

Member

WACA Guest

Forum Posts: 105

Member Since:
October 8, 2012

Offline

October 24, 2015 - 12:07 pm

I was digging through my collection and had a question about a 20 in. late model 94 carbine that I have had for years. Ser.# 3159447 that has either a stainless or nickel receiver. The only blue parts are the barrel, mag tube & loading gate. I don’t know enough to know the difference between the two. When I bought this gun I was told the finish was done by Winchester which I took with a grain of salt. There are no marking to denote any special run. Hammer and top of bolt have engine turning. Inside of receiver looks “unblued” also. Finish looks like stainless to me, but I am wrong more that right. Anyone ever heard of such?

Henry Mero

Member

WACA Member

Forum Posts: 1363

Member Since:
December 21, 2006

Offline

October 24, 2015 - 1:23 pm

They made a series called “antique” about that time period and I believe some of them were plated. They would have a line of engraving on the receiver. Henry

“

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

1873man

Wisconsin

Member

WACA Member

Forum Posts: 4689

Member Since:
May 2, 2009

Offline

October 24, 2015 - 2:13 pm

If a magnet does not attract to the metal its stainless.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

Email: [email protected]

Bert H.

Kingston, WA

Admin

Forum Posts: 12779

Member Since:
April 15, 2005

Offline

October 25, 2015 - 12:29 am

With an early 1970s serial number, my bet is that it is simply devoid of all the original finish. During that timeframe, the bluing did not adhere to the sintered steel receiver frame at all.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L