Log In
April 25, 2011
Offline
Hello,
I recently purchased this 1960 Featherweight in 270 as a shooter/user. I notice that it has some unique features such as:
super grade style forearm checkering
super grade style grip cap
22 LPI checkering
Winchester Pad (may have been added later LOP is 13″)
Low Comb Stock (disc. by 1960?)
I pulled the action and the inletting looks factory to me, but I’m going to compare it to another FW I have. Any insight would be appreciated…again I bought this to enjoy, because it felt good to me, not because I thought it was worth big $$$.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/stanley1980/shares/WW6Zwt
https://www.flickr.com/photos/stanley1980/shares/CW6jin
https://www.flickr.com/photos/stanley1980/shares/3ZB3b6
https://www.flickr.com/photos/stanley1980/shares/3ZB3b6
https://www.flickr.com/photos/stanley1980/shares/U0o769
April 25, 2011
Offline
Are you guys able to see the links to the photos?
February 19, 2013
Offline
photos dont show up in the link….at least from my computer..
April 25, 2011
Offline
Here are the pics….any insight would be appreciated
November 5, 2014
Offline
Hi 7x57hunter-
These images may help. They are side-by-side comparisons of a M70 low comb standard FWT stock and a M70 Super Grade FWT stock, both in near new condition:
They illustrate the checkering patterns, grip cap, swivel attachment, and fore end tip from the inside, so might be of some help comparing to your stock.
Best,
Lou
WACA 9519; Studying Pre-64 Model 70 Winchesters
April 25, 2011
Offline
Lou, Thank you!
I compared it side by side to another featherweight. It looks entirely possible to “re-work” a standard stock to add a grip cap and recontour the grip to match. Obviously re-checkering would be required. The forend would then need to be sanded past the checkering and recheckered too.
Either way the grip, being oval and slimmer than the featherweight I compared it to, makes the standard feel like you are gripping a 2×4. I really like how this stock feels and I’m going to use it and enjoy it.
1 Guest(s)
