Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Questions after receiving 1873 letter
Avatar
RealBigChin
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
December 5, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 1, 2021 - 7:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Just got my letter back on my 1873. The good news is that the set trigger is factory. The bad news is that is was originally 44 and is now 32 WCF. Is it possible this was rebarreled by the factory or should I assume it was done privately since it isn’t on the letter?

I also found it interesting that it was in the warehouse for 4 years after the serial number was applied. Is that normal? Thanks for any info. 

Image Enlarger


Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger
Image Enlarger
Image Enlarger

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12985
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
January 1, 2021 - 7:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

In your place, I would contact the CFM records office and ask them to double check the ledger record for your serial number. All visual indications point towards it being an original 32 WCF rifle. I suspect a mistake was made listing it as a 44 WCF. Bob (1873man) most likely can add some useful information.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Eric Ryan
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 56
Member Since:
May 21, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
January 1, 2021 - 10:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi,  I would suspect that the bottom tang, with the set trigger, is the only original part.  The rest of the rifle was added later.   Eric

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4703
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 1, 2021 - 11:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

If you can post some good clear pictures of the lower tang and how it fits into the receiver and several of the receiver. What is the serial number? You can’t post directly to the forum, you need to host the pictures on another site and link to them or email them to me at the below address.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5873
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
January 1, 2021 - 11:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Bert H. said
All visual indications point towards it being an original 32 WCF rifle.
Bert  

Bert, are there pictures somewhere?  Like Bob, I’d like to see a picture of the receiver.

Avatar
RealBigChin
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
December 5, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
January 1, 2021 - 11:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Are the pictures not showing up? They’re showing up on my end. I’ll email them directly to you Bob. 

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12985
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
7
January 2, 2021 - 12:26 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Chuck said

Bert H. said
All visual indications point towards it being an original 32 WCF rifle.
Bert  

Bert, are there pictures somewhere?  Like Bob, I’d like to see a picture of the receiver.  

Chuck,

The OP included (5) pictures with his opening post… are you not seeing them?  The receiver frame is the step-down type used on the smaller caliber Model 1873s, and the lower tang appears to fit up to the receiver frame correctly.

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12985
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
8
January 2, 2021 - 12:29 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

RealBigChin said
Are the pictures not showing up? They’re showing up on my end. I’ll email them directly to you Bob.   

They show for me just fine, but it could be be I am the Forum Administrator.

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4703
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
January 2, 2021 - 12:30 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Here are the pictures. As far as I can tell the lower tang fits and matches the receiver given the condition of the gun. I would have Cody do a double check of the records.

Bob

image0.jpegImage Enlarger

image1.jpegImage Enlarger
image2.jpegImage Enlarger
image9.jpegImage Enlarger

image10.jpegImage Enlarger

image11.jpegImage Enlarger
image3.jpegImage Enlarger
image4.jpegImage Enlarger

image5.jpegImage Enlarger

image6.jpegImage Enlarger
image7.jpegImage Enlarger
image8.jpegImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5873
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
January 2, 2021 - 12:32 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Bert H. said

Chuck said

Bert H. said
All visual indications point towards it being an original 32 WCF rifle.
Bert  

Bert, are there pictures somewhere?  Like Bob, I’d like to see a picture of the receiver.  

Chuck,

The OP included (5) pictures with his opening post… are you not seeing them?  The receiver frame is the step-down type used on the smaller caliber Model 1873s, and the lower tang appears to fit up to the receiver frame correctly.  

They are now after Bob posted them.  This receiver was not meant for a 44 cal. 

Avatar
RealBigChin
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
December 5, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
January 2, 2021 - 12:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Does it make a difference that there is a B at the end of the serial number and no B on my letter?

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5873
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
January 2, 2021 - 12:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

RealBigChin said
Does it make a difference that there is a B at the end of the serial number and no B on my letter?  

No, what we are looking at is the step down at the muzzle end of the receiver.  This was done on the smaller caliber guns.  Not on a 44.

Avatar
RealBigChin
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
December 5, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
January 2, 2021 - 1:00 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

So if I understand correctly, the only 2 possible explanations are that they made a mistake on the letter, or the lower tang is not original and was taken from another gun and placed on this one?

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4703
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
January 2, 2021 - 1:05 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Three possibilities, It can also be the ledger entry for the gun is wrong.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
win4575
Montana
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 700
Member Since:
November 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
January 2, 2021 - 4:10 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Stepped receivers were used on some late model 73’s in .44 caliber.  These are most often very high serial numbers.  It could be done, but there would be a lot of work involved in changing a small caliber reciever to a large caliber or large to small.  My guess is the letter is wrong.

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4703
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
January 2, 2021 - 4:24 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Here is a picture showing the three different receivers. Left to right, 44, 38/22 and 32.

Bob

receivers_small.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5209
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
January 2, 2021 - 12:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

win4575 said
Stepped receivers were used on some late model 73’s in .44 caliber.  These are most often very high serial numbers.  It could be done, but there would be a lot of work involved in changing a small caliber reciever to a large caliber or large to small.  My guess is the letter is wrong.  

The stepped receivers that were used on 73’s in .44 caliber – did Winchester simply use some .38-40 receivers they had on hand?  Did they have to rework any aspect of them?  Or, is this is a fourth style receiver?

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4703
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
January 2, 2021 - 3:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

It is the 38 frame style they used with the short barreled 44 rifles and 44 carbines and then at the end in the parts cleanup.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5209
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
19
January 2, 2021 - 4:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

For the rifle under discussion, it sounds like we’re back to either an error in reading the ledger or in the ledger itself as the very topic candidates for an explanation.

Avatar
RealBigChin
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
December 5, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
January 2, 2021 - 4:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I sent an email to Jessica to see if she could double check the records. I’ll update when I get a response. 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: winchester73, Bert H., wally, mrcvs, Byron Russell, Rick Lindquist, Jeremy P, WinKorm94
Guest(s) 515
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6468
Chuck: 5873
steve004: 5209
1873man: 4703
deerhunter: 2711
Big Larry: 2559
twobit: 2505
mrcvs: 2213
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
WinKorm94
Wallyg703
GunLegacy
tcwyb
spikemiller
ob98
Ricky Summer
Peter Cipollini
Jhark
Oldtimer52
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14814
Posts: 132571

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10050
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation