Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters




sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Print sp_TopicIcon
Question on authenticity of some 1892's
January 10, 2020
1:21 am
Avatar
Rural Nevada
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 29
Member Since:
December 12, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I recently discovered that two of my model 1892 which I bought as 'original' are lacking proof marks and I'd like to determine if Winchester sent out any of the early 1892 without proof marks. 

Both of the rifles in question have serial numbers indicating manufacture of 1905. One has a proof mark on the receiver but none on the barrel. The other has no visible proof mark on barrel or receiver. 

Both match the Cody Museum research. That is to say, the caliber, barrel and magazine are as stated in the records. They appear unaltered in any way. I can't see any evidence that the proof marks have been 'brushed' away. The finish on metal and wood all appear original, with uniform wear.

Do I have modified rifles, or is there a chance that Winchester shipped them in this time frame lacking some proof marks?

 

Any help is appreciated.

NP

Nevada Paul

Life Member NRA

January 10, 2020
1:43 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 510
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I have several '92's up to 1906 with no proof marks, twobit will be better able to tell You when they started using proofs on them and may be explain why proofed rec'vr and not he bbl.

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

January 10, 2020
1:48 am
Avatar
Rural Nevada
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 29
Member Since:
December 12, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks!  That gives me hope that these two are genuine. They certainly appear so otherwise.

Nevada Paul

Life Member NRA

January 10, 2020
2:13 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1831
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Very close to 1905 is when the proof marks were added.  Like Henry said twobit or Bert can answer this better.

January 10, 2020
9:16 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2578
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Nevada Paul said
I recently discovered that two of my model 1892 which I bought as 'original' are lacking proof marks and I'd like to determine if Winchester sent out any of the early 1892 without proof marks. 

Both of the rifles in question have serial numbers indicating manufacture of 1905. One has a proof mark on the receiver but none on the barrel. The other has no visible proof mark on barrel or receiver. 

Both match the Cody Museum research. That is to say, the caliber, barrel and magazine are as stated in the records. They appear unaltered in any way. I can't see any evidence that the proof marks have been 'brushed' away. The finish on metal and wood all appear original, with uniform wear.

Do I have modified rifles, or is there a chance that Winchester shipped them in this time frame lacking some proof marks?

 

Any help is appreciated.

NP  

Hello,

I will be happy to help you.  Can you send me a series of photos to 2bitrifles@gmail.com  The 1892's are consistently proofed after SN 300,000 during 1905.  There are certainly earlier guns that were assembled with receivers serialized  earlier but not used to make up a fully assembled gun until later after the process of proof stamps started.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

January 10, 2020
9:26 pm
Avatar
Rural Nevada
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 29
Member Since:
December 12, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks Michael. 

I'll certainly send photos as soon as I get back home which will be not before next weekend. 

I appreciate the feedback and help.

Paul 

Nevada Paul

Life Member NRA

Forum Timezone: UTC 0

Most Users Ever Online: 628

Currently Online: foxfire, TR, Big Mac
49 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)


Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 16

Topics: 7626

Posts: 63604


Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1040

Members: 9536

Moderators: 5

Admins: 3


Top Posters:

1873man: 4441

twobit: 2578

TXGunNut: 2496

clarence: 1931

Chuck: 1831

Maverick: 1619

Big Larry: 1445

JWA: 1356

steve004: 1216

Wincacher: 1185

Navigation