Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Proof Marks 1892
Avatar
mark minnillo
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 245
Member Since:
January 28, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
September 25, 2026 - 1:05 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

This is on an 1892 special order rifle. Half round half octagon, half mag, and shotgun butt. Gun made in 1907. Am I correct that “technically” there were only 3 years of production when both caliber markings and WP proof marks were on top of the barrel?

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14748
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
September 25, 2026 - 1:12 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Mark,

For the Model 1894, it wasn’t even quite 3-years.  Winchester began Proof marking the barrels and receiver frame ring in July 1905 and in late 1907, the caliber marking began transitioning to the left side of the barrel.  I suspect that the Model 1892 was the same.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5837
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
September 25, 2026 - 12:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The interesting and useful information provided on this site just doesn’t stop coming!  Thanks Bert!

Avatar
Anthony #5411
Ohio
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1935
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
September 25, 2026 - 1:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I’m in agreement with Steve, as the information provided here is another great example of the many years and countless hours that has gone into the Survey’s and research to bring this to light. 

Thanks to Bert for educating us, and thanks to Mark for posting this thread. Smile

 

Tony

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2738
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
September 25, 2026 - 4:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

mark minnillo said
This is on an 1892 special order rifle. Half round half octagon, half mag, and shotgun butt. Gun made in 1907. Am I correct that “technically” there were only 3 years of production when both caliber markings and WP proof marks were on top of the barrel?
  

Hello Mark,

The proof marks began to appear on the top of the barrel along with the caliber stamp during mid 1905 (approximately SN 300000) on the Model 1892 and persisted until the SN 420000 range which corresponds to Feb 1908.  Sporadic occurrences continue well into 1909.  On many SRC’s the barrel proof was located in front of the rear sight as opposed to adjacent to the caliber stamp.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14748
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
6
September 25, 2026 - 4:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

twobit said

mark minnillo said
This is on an 1892 special order rifle. Half round half octagon, half mag, and shotgun butt. Gun made in 1907. Am I correct that “technically” there were only 3 years of production when both caliber markings and WP proof marks were on top of the barrel?
  

Hello Mark,
The proof marks began to appear on the top of the barrel along with the caliber stamp during mid 1905 (approximately SN 300000) on the Model 1892 and persisted until the SN 420000 range which corresponds to Feb 1908.  Sporadic occurrences continue well into 1909.  On many SRC’s the barrel proof was located in front of the rear sight as opposed to adjacent to the caliber stamp.
Michael
  

It was the same thing for the Model 1894 SRCs… the barrel proof mark was stamped in front of the rear sight instead of the caliber stamp.

344706-August-14th-Patent-date-error.jpg

 

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Jeremy P
The Great State
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1394
Member Since:
April 30, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
September 25, 2026 - 5:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said

  

It was the same thing for the Model 1894 SRCs… the barrel proof mark was stamped in front of the rear sight instead of the caliber stamp.

 
Bert
  

This last pic Bert is good, I wouldn’t have trusted this as a whole if I’d just found this at a show on my own….looks “weird”!

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14748
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
8
September 25, 2026 - 7:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Jeremy P said

Bert H. said

  

It was the same thing for the Model 1894 SRCs… the barrel proof mark was stamped in front of the rear sight instead of the caliber stamp.
 
Bert
  

This last pic Bert is good, I wouldn’t have trusted this as a whole if I’d just found this at a show on my own….looks “weird”!
  

Interestingly, nearly all of the Model 1894 Carbine barrels with the proof mark stamp in front of the rear sight are also the “August 14” Patent date error barrels that were manufactured in the year 1907.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2738
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
September 25, 2026 - 7:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Things are not nearly simple or consistent on the Model 1892 SRC’s.  The barrel proof in front of the rear sight is the position for the 32, 38, and 44 WCF configurations.  But the 25-20 WCF examples had the caliber stamp designed as a two line style which then apparently left room for the barrel proof to be positioned aft of the rear sight and next to the caliber stamp.  And of course because this is Winchester where exceptions tend to be part of the norm there are the weird occurrences of 44 WCF carbines with the barrel proof positioned BELOW the caliber stamp!  On the attached portion of my spreadsheet the green fields denote proofs forward of the rear sight.  The orange denotes proofs adjacent to the caliber stamp associated with the 25-20 WCF rifles.  The grey color are the 44 WCF rifles with the proof stamp below the caliber stamp.

Michael

Screenshot-2016-07-15-09.45.03.png20150827085042-7073.jpgScreenshot-2026-09-25-at-3.36.50 PM.png

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Chris D
Melbourne Australia
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 355
Member Since:
July 14, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
September 25, 2026 - 9:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Here is my half mag 1892 SRC. I got this one from Malcolm Michael. It is serial 351438 in that list

 

25-20-SRC.jpg

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

A man can never have too many WINCHESTERS...

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: Bert H., steve004, wally, cj57, 1ned1, mrcvs, Mark Douglas, Tedk, Bryan Austin, Green River Gus, Deg, MidwestCrisis
Guest(s) 113
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7631
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6861
steve004: 5837
1873man: 4990
deerhunter: 3066
twobit: 2738
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2518
Zebulon: 2383
Newest Members:
Brick767
Steve72
E.S.Blofeld
Keith gun
dirkb
Mustang66
Gerald Lucas
IMCWC
Mojo2352
James L
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 16278
Posts: 148952

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10971
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation