Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Parts Differences between .32 WCF and .44 WCF Model 1892
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 216
Member Since:
March 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
May 18, 2018 - 1:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Recently got a barreled action model 1892 rifle. Bore isn’t great and has been cut(now a 22 inch octagon). I considered making up a shooter in .44 WCF out of it. I know the cartridge guides would be different and extractor. Any of you guys know what parts I have to source? Or maybe not worth the bother.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 941
Member Since:
September 28, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
May 18, 2018 - 2:18 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I can give you a few for sure and there might be more……..Complete magazine tube assembly and forearm wood for the larger diameter tube. I believe the bolt is different due to the difference in case head diameter. Your receiver will need to be modified to accept the larger magazine tube and cartridges. You already mentioned the cartridge guides. I’m not sure if they used the same lifter or not. That should give you a good start, if I missed anything hopefully someone else will jump in and fill in the blanks. Good luck and happy hunting with your project.

Erin

Avatar
Ft.Worth, Texas
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 142
Member Since:
March 16, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
May 18, 2018 - 2:26 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

To add to Erins post: Carrier, tenon, mag tube ring, Breech Bolt assembly, extractor, ejector, and forend tip. Im sure there is more so, to answer your question, it would not be worth the expense. If the rest of the gun is nice, just find a replacement 32 cal barrel.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2488
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 18, 2018 - 12:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The lifter is different.  The 25-20 and 32 WCF lifter have a concave surface while the 38 and 44 WCF are flat surfaced.

MichaelLarge-Cal-Lifter.jpgImage EnlargerSmall-cal-Lifter.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
South Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1094
Member Since:
March 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
May 18, 2018 - 8:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

If trying to convert a small caliber 92 to large caliber you will have to do the following:

  • Carrier/elevators are different
  • Bolts are different along with different size/shape ejectors
  • Levers are different
  • You would have to enlarge the opening for the magazine tube in the receiver
  • The inside of the large caliber receiver is milled for the carrier spring whereas the small caliber incorporates this into the cartridge guides.
  • Magazine tube and retaining bands are different diameters. Magazine spring and follower different sizes
  • On rifles the forend cap is different size diameter for magazine tube opening
  • For rifles the forearm tenon is different
  • On rifles and carbines the forearm wood is different

Youd be better off starting with a large caliber receiver to build a large caliber 92

DSC_0245-Copy-3.JPG

1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member

"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6257
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
May 18, 2018 - 10:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have a very similar 1892 with a 23″ barrel. Minimal collector value but a pretty sweet action so I had it relined. It wasn’t a cheap repair but I suspect it would be less $ and trouble than the 44WCF conversion. I know you want a 44WCF but the 32WCF is a joy to shoot. Looks a little silly with tang and globe sights but I wanted a shooter and certainly have one.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
New Mexico
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1167
Member Since:
December 1, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
May 19, 2018 - 12:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Basically, the only caliber changes that are practical in the Model 1892 are between 25-20 and 32-20 and between 38-40 and 44-40.  Aside from necessary changes to the magazine tube recess in the frame, there are just too many parts that need to be exchanged making the cost prohibitive vs. the value of the outcome.  If the receiver is complete (with all the internal parts, why not install a new 25-20 or 32-20 barrel.  You can get a good, newly made, replica barrel for around $400.

1876-4-1.jpg

"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend." 

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 216
Member Since:
March 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
May 21, 2018 - 4:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for all the replies. I’m thinking it will stay a .32/20 for sure. Never fired one but probably a pleasant round for plinking.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Tony. R, rogertherelic, Pwog, UpInTheBigTrees, Griz57
Guest(s) 84
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6257
Chuck: 5689
steve004: 5069
1873man: 4672
Big Larry: 2521
twobit: 2488
mrcvs: 2156
Maverick: 1995
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14546
Posts: 129735

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2036
Members: 9861
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation