Forum -

Ordinance marking on 1894

Add Reply

Add Topic

deerhunter

Troutdale, OR

Member

WACA Member

Forum Posts: 2577

Member Since:
June 26, 2013

Offline

February 23, 2015 - 4:12 pm

This ordinance marking looks different than the legit ones that I’m used to seeing. Are there any legitimate variations in the flaming bomb marking of this era? Or maybe this is a fake?

https://www.proxibid.com/asp/LotDetail.asp?ahid=8940&aid=92620&lid=23772488&rts=/asp/searchadvanced_i.asp%23searchid%3D37480408%26type%3Dlot%26search%3Dwinchester%26sort%3Drelevance%26view%3Dgallery%26length%3D25%26start%3D26%26refine%3D#topoflot

Bert H.

Kingston, WA

Admin

Forum Posts: 12361

Member Since:
April 15, 2005

Offline

February 23, 2015 - 5:02 pm

deerhunter said

This ordinance marking looks different than the legit ones that I’m used to seeing. Are there any legitimate variations in the flaming bomb marking of this era? Or maybe this is a fake?

https://www.proxibid.com/asp/LotDetail.asp?ahid=8940&aid=92620&lid=23772488&rts=/asp/searchadvanced_i.asp%23searchid%3D37480408%26type%3Dlot%26search%3Dwinchester%26sort%3Drelevance%26view%3Dgallery%26length%3D25%26start%3D26%26refine%3D#topoflot

Don,

I looked at that gun a few days ago and noted it as a fake ordnance marking.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L