Log In
November 19, 2006
Offline
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/910078984
I can’t begin to make sense of this. So, he’s telling us Winchester took a plain model 64 and decided to change the “6” to a “9”? And why would anyone else do this? Wow… the b.s. that gets spewed about.
November 1, 2013
Offline
If it was only “lightly used,” why was the buttstock refinished? Examine where it fits the rcvr.; hate to think it left the factory looking like that.
April 15, 2005
Online
steve004 said
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/910078984I can’t begin to make sense of this. So, he’s telling us Winchester took a plain model 64 and decided to change the “6” to a “9”? And why would anyone else do this? Wow… the b.s. that gets spewed about.
Not me! That is a standard Model 64 Rifle, and it most certainly was not marked/stamped “94” by Winchester.
As a matter of edification, the seller states “there are other guns out there”
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
November 19, 2006
Offline
Bert H. said
steve004 said
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/910078984I can’t begin to make sense of this. So, he’s telling us Winchester took a plain model 64 and decided to change the “6” to a “9”? And why would anyone else do this? Wow… the b.s. that gets spewed about.
Not me! That is a standard Model 64 Rifle, and it most certainly was not marked/stamped “94” by Winchester.
As a matter of edification, the seller states “there are other guns out there”
Bert – you read it better than me, but in reading it again, the seller states, “there are other guns our there” 
My main amusement was in his statement that the change in the model designation will add a premium. Well, actually, he states, “The mis marking on this rifle tends to add a premium to the value.”
November 1, 2013
Offline
steve004 said
Well, actually, he states, “The mis marking on this rifle tends to add a premium to the value.”
Guess he’s comparing it that famous US airmail stamp with the Jenny printed upside down.
