Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Ok, which of you guys are among the, "other guys" this seller is referring to?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4097
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
September 8, 2021 - 10:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

https://www.gunbroker.com/item/910078984

I can’t begin to make sense of this.  So, he’s telling us Winchester took a plain model 64 and decided to change the “6” to a “9”?  And why would anyone else do this?  Wow… the b.s. that gets spewed about.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6154
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
September 8, 2021 - 11:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

If it was only “lightly used,” why was the buttstock refinished?  Examine where it fits the rcvr.; hate to think it left the factory looking like that.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10618
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
September 9, 2021 - 12:14 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

steve004 said
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/910078984

I can’t begin to make sense of this.  So, he’s telling us Winchester took a plain model 64 and decided to change the “6” to a “9”?  And why would anyone else do this?  Wow… the b.s. that gets spewed about.  

Not me!  That is a standard Model 64 Rifle, and it most certainly was not marked/stamped “94” by Winchester. 

As a matter of edification, the seller states “there are other guns out there”

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4097
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
September 9, 2021 - 12:40 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

steve004 said
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/910078984

I can’t begin to make sense of this.  So, he’s telling us Winchester took a plain model 64 and decided to change the “6” to a “9”?  And why would anyone else do this?  Wow… the b.s. that gets spewed about.  

Not me!  That is a standard Model 64 Rifle, and it most certainly was not marked/stamped “94” by Winchester. 

As a matter of edification, the seller states “there are other guns out there”  

Bert – you read it better than me, but in reading it again, the seller states, “there are other guns our there” Laugh

My main amusement was in his statement that the change in the model designation will add a premium.  Well, actually, he states, “The mis marking on this rifle tends to add a premium to the value.”  Laugh

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6154
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
September 9, 2021 - 2:08 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said
  Well, actually, he states, “The mis marking on this rifle tends to add a premium to the value.”   

Guess he’s comparing it that famous US airmail stamp with the Jenny printed upside down.

Avatar
Taos NM
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 224
Member Since:
October 29, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
September 9, 2021 - 1:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Too bad someone ruined it–worthless………………

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: Byron Russell, Blueliner, TXGunNut, [email protected]
Guest(s) 57
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6154
TXGunNut: 4869
Chuck: 4518
1873man: 4259
steve004: 4097
Big Larry: 2293
twobit: 2284
TR: 1690
mrcvs: 1656
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12509
Posts: 108584

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1727
Members: 8718
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation