Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 111
Member Since:
December 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
June 6, 2020 - 1:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

there is a local auction coming up, there is a M1873 in.44 cal, it has I believe what is called a button magazine, stops at the front of front handguard. are these pretty common with that magazine?   terry

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4608
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
June 6, 2020 - 2:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Terry,

I don’t recall Winchester calling them button mags in the records in the 73’s. They were called 1/2 mags or they would state the number of shells it would hold. There are some guns I see that look like button mags but most have a little of the tube exposed. I have one that looks like a button mag and it letters 1/2 mag. There are not a lot of 1/2 mag 73’s. Out of 14404 rifles in my survey 760 are half mag but a 1/2 mag is not a drawing card to most collectors but some do. I would check with Cody before you proceed. What is the serial number?

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 111
Member Since:
December 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
June 6, 2020 - 2:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

1873man said
Terry,

I don’t recall Winchester calling them button mags in the records in the 73’s. They were called 1/2 mags or they would state the number of shells it would hold. There are some guns I see that look like button mags but most have a little of the tube exposed. I have one that looks like a button mag and it letters 1/2 mag. There are not a lot of 1/2 mag 73’s. Out of 14404 rifles in my survey 760 are half mag but a 1/2 mag is not a drawing card to most collectors but some do. I would check with Cody before you proceed. What is the serial number?

Bob  

Seriel # is 191332B I looked on line and it looks like half magazine, button.   terry

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4608
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
June 7, 2020 - 4:12 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I looked at a old RIA auction and it does look like the button mag.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4926
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
June 7, 2020 - 2:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man said
Terry,

I don’t recall Winchester calling them button mags in the records in the 73’s. They were called 1/2 mags or they would state the number of shells it would hold. There are some guns I see that look like button mags but most have a little of the tube exposed. I have one that looks like a button mag and it letters 1/2 mag. There are not a lot of 1/2 mag 73’s. Out of 14404 rifles in my survey 760 are half mag but a 1/2 mag is not a drawing card to most collectors but some do. I would check with Cody before you proceed. What is the serial number?

Bob  

I would be more drawn to the rifle because of the special order half magazine. I appreciate the rarity but also enjoy the aesthetics of the configuration.  In considering my comments, know that I am in the minority.  

Here is one of mine which I think is the type magazine cap you are describing:

owquBYn.jpgImage EnlargerThis is a low finish rifle but I still like it – despite the crescent butt 😉  Here are two more photos – it has nice wood:

zr9gcBE.jpgImage EnlargerCUcJ7Pu.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 111
Member Since:
December 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
June 7, 2020 - 4:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

yes that is exactly what it looks like buttplate and all.   terry

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5459
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
June 7, 2020 - 4:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Steve, here is a picture of caps that were offered for short magazines.  The 2 that stick out farther are attached differently.  So your gun was probably made in the later half of the 1880’s or later.

IMG_0567-002.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4926
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
June 7, 2020 - 5:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said
Steve, here is a picture of caps that were offered for short magazines.  The 2 that stick out farther are attached differently.  So your gun was probably made in the later half of the 1880’s or later.

IMG_0567-002.jpgImage Enlarger  

Chuck – that is a very helpful photo.  And you’re right on as far as when my rifle was made.  My factory letter states it was shipped on 5-21-90.  Also specifies the 38 caliber, octagon barrel, plain trigger, case hardened and 1/2 mag.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 111
Member Since:
December 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
June 7, 2020 - 5:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

So the half mags on the m1873’s are not all that rare right?   terry

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12345
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
June 7, 2020 - 5:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

tsillik said
So the half mags on the m1873’s are not all that rare right?   terry  

I would use the term “less common”.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
SO. Oregon
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 684
Member Since:
June 5, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
June 8, 2020 - 12:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

That solves the problem of possible damage to the magazine tube.

Vince
Southern Oregon
NRA member
Fraternal Order of Eagles

 “There is but one answer to be made to the dynamite bomb and that can best be made by the Winchester rifle.”

Teddy Roosevelt 

4029-1.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5459
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
June 8, 2020 - 5:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

steve004 said

Chuck – that is a very helpful photo.  And you’re right on as far as when my rifle was made.  My factory letter states it was shipped on 5-21-90.  Also specifies the 38 caliber, octagon barrel, plain trigger, case hardened and 1/2 mag.  

Lately I have learned that a lot of things happened in the mid 1880’s to most of the Winchesters.  It makes me wonder why?  Maverick helped out with info on forend caps for a 76 a member is restoring.  Come to find out the same happened on the 73’s too.  We also found out that stocks were changed from thick to thin in this period.  I wonder what other changes were made during this period?  Was there a cost cutting program or were they just trying to be more efficient?  I now know why I had such a problem finding a butt plate for my thick wood 1887 shotgun that was manufactured in 1889.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4926
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
June 8, 2020 - 6:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said

steve004 said

Chuck – that is a very helpful photo.  And you’re right on as far as when my rifle was made.  My factory letter states it was shipped on 5-21-90.  Also specifies the 38 caliber, octagon barrel, plain trigger, case hardened and 1/2 mag.  

Lately I have learned that a lot of things happened in the mid 1880’s to most of the Winchesters.  It makes me wonder why?  Maverick helped out with info on forend caps for a 76 a member is restoring.  Come to find out the same happened on the 73’s too.  We also found out that stocks were changed from thick to thin in this period.  I wonder what other changes were made during this period?  Was there a cost cutting program or were they just trying to be more efficient?  I now know why I had such a problem finding a butt plate for my thick wood 1887 shotgun that was manufactured in 1889.  

Interesting observations.  I don’t have the answers but if anyone does, chances are the hang around here.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 58
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6030
Chuck: 5459
steve004: 4926
1873man: 4608
Big Larry: 2492
twobit: 2444
mrcvs: 2084
Maverick: 1859
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14228
Posts: 126118

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2003
Members: 9690
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation