Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 65 218 BEE serial numbers
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 94
Member Since:
September 14, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 4, 2019 - 8:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I am looking at a Winchester Model 65 in 218 BEE, on an auction sight, serial number 1006102  The description states “This is a post-war parts clean-up gun.” I can’t find any serial number reference for the year.  It is in really good original condition, with the exception of a couple of extra screws on the side which look like it had a side mount Lyman sight at one time. I am looking to add a Model 65 to my Winchester collection, something that will increase in value over time. Should I pass on this one?

I appreciate any comments.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 400
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
April 4, 2019 - 8:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I would think that gun is a late 1930’s gun.  The serial number is in the proper range for a 218 Bee. The date on the bottom of the barrel will probably help. The 65 in 218 Bee would probably have a bolt peep on it.  Holes in the receiver will make it less desirable to most collectors.  If the holes are for a Lyman 56 receiver sight and the bolt is not cut for a Lyman 98a, then one might think it was ordered that way.  If the holes are for a scope base, then it’s a completely different thing.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10835
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
April 4, 2019 - 8:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Model 65 serial number 1006102 was manufactured Pre-WW II (1941).  When I examined it, the bolt was milled & tapped for the No. 98C bolt-peep sight, but was wearing a Lyman No. 56 receiver mounted peep sight.  It has non-factory original holes drilled & tapped in the receiver.  Yes, you should definitely Pass on that rifle.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 94
Member Since:
September 14, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
April 5, 2019 - 12:59 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks to all who commented. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1726
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
April 5, 2019 - 1:14 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I would question the value of a Model 65 as a long term investment, even if not drilled and tapped.  I think it’s just one of those models that will have little interest amongst the much smaller group of collectors in future generations.  A good example of just because something may be uncommon due to low production numbers, it does not necessarily translate to an increase in value over time.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6364
TXGunNut: 5034
Chuck: 4597
1873man: 4322
steve004: 4250
Big Larry: 2341
twobit: 2295
mrcvs: 1726
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12754
Posts: 111098

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1763
Members: 8850
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation