Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 65 218 Bee Factory Stock?
Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14723
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
August 14, 2021 - 7:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Robert,

The rifle in question is not an original Model 65.  All original Model 65 rifles are found in the 999600 – 1007608 serial number range.  The rifle you have is either a very early Model 1892, or an early production Model 53.  The factory marking on the upper tang will positively identify it.

Based on what I am seeing in the pictures, this rifle is completely non-original, including the stocks… sorry for the bad news.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
R. Dean
Fort Worth, TX
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 22
Member Since:
December 17, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
August 14, 2021 - 7:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

No bad news! That’s what I was expecting and honestly I have no issue with it being a first year 1892 even if it is completely unoriginal. 

I do have questions about it not being a Model 65 though. All the markings appear to be correct per Madis and it does say the Model 65s were in rare cases not numbered with the 1892’s. The markings on the left side of the barrel are correct to the book. The upper tang marking is indeed the same as a Model 53, but the book does not state anything about the tang mark of the 65 so I’m ignorant on that part. 

As always, thank you for the education.

IMG_0301.JPGIMG_0302.JPG

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Robert Dean
406-459-9948
[email protected]
Avatar
R. Dean
Fort Worth, TX
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 22
Member Since:
December 17, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
August 14, 2021 - 7:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Also, it does have the Mail Order Parts Proof Mark “P” along with the Winchester Proof Mark on the barrel. So it would be my understanding that if this is an early model 1892 the barrel has most definitely been replaced. 

Robert Dean
406-459-9948
[email protected]
Avatar
pdog72
Wyoming - Gods Country
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1295
Member Since:
January 26, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
August 14, 2021 - 7:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Looks like a M53 receiver with a M65 barrel.   FYI – Model 65’s were a pistol grip whereas this is a straight stock. A great looking shooter …….. enjoy it. 

                                                                               ~Gary~

                                                                                                                                                                              94-SRR.jpg

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14723
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
August 14, 2021 - 8:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

R. Dean said
Also, it does have the Mail Order Parts Proof Mark “P” along with the Winchester Proof Mark on the barrel. So it would be my understanding that if this is an early model 1892 the barrel has most definitely been replaced.   

The tang marking identifies it as a Model 53 rifle that has been rebarreled with a mail order Model 65 barrel. Per the factory records, the receiver was manufactured in May, 1925.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: 1873man, JWA, James Eichas, Saddlering2218, Fedelsur
Guest(s) 489
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7617
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6857
steve004: 5828
1873man: 4986
deerhunter: 3063
twobit: 2734
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2513
Zebulon: 2368
Newest Members:
Nodrog
Trav0810
Jim91
Roadrunner13
kdawg71
Realblag
hbjbhbhbhjbhj
mbcarson1996
Old Timer
GunnMan
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 16260
Posts: 148739

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10961
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation