Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 1892 NOT 20 Inch Octagon Configuration
Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2493
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 16, 2020 - 1:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Good morning,

I was cataloging the current listings from Ward’s Auction and came across this Model 1892 with a 20 inch octagon barrel.  It looks like a correct short fore end wood and the rear sight is located closer to the receiver face.  The problem arrises from the fact that this rifle was listed on Gunbroker.com back in 2013 out of Houlton, ME as a 38 WCF round barrel sporting rifle with a Nickel Steel barrel.  THAT is much more uncommon than a 20 inch gun by miles!!

The original pics from GBpix629278953.jpg

pix884837775.jpgpix913059694.jpgpix041594083.jpgpix230803052.jpgpix279911924.jpgpix385112658.jpgpix416636142.jpg

And the pics from the Ward’s listing:

4031.jpg

Make a note someplace to look out for this again some place else.

Michael

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5173
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 16, 2020 - 2:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Michael – I think many of us are grateful you watch out for this stuff.  I know I am.  Given how well Austin’s .44-40 short rifle did on the gunbroker auction recently, I suspect this one is being eyed with great interest by many.  

On the rarity factor of the rifle’s original configuration, I was not tuned into the rarity factor of nickel steel markings on a .38-40 round barrel rifle.  I just checked a .38-40 I have with 24 inch round barrel and full magazine.  The serial number is just short of one million, yet no nickel steel marking.  What serial number range do these markings fall in?  Also, more common to find these markings among the other chamberings?

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2493
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 16, 2020 - 3:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

steve004 said
Michael – I think many of us are grateful you watch out for this stuff.  I know I am.  Given how well Austin’s .44-40 short rifle did on the gunbroker auction recently, I suspect this one is being eyed with great interest by many.  

On the rarity factor of the rifle’s original configuration, I was not tuned into the rarity factor of nickel steel markings on a .38-40 round barrel rifle.  I just checked a .38-40 I have with 24 inch round barrel and full magazine.  The serial number is just short of one million, yet no nickel steel marking.  What serial number range do these markings fall in?  Also, more common to find these markings among the other chamberings?  

Steve,

Nickel steel barrel in any configuration or caliber are extremely uncommon for Model 1892 rifles.  And thanks for the kind words.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 16, 2020 - 4:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Think Wards would pass along to the consigner a generous offer to buy the original barrel removed from this gun?  Their response would be interesting–except that you’d never get one.

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5173
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 16, 2020 - 5:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

clarence said
Think Wards would pass along to the consigner a generous offer to buy the original barrel removed from this gun?  Their response would be interesting–except that you’d never get one.  

I had been wondering what they did with the original barrel….

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5173
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
February 16, 2020 - 5:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Let me add, it looks like the barrel and magazine tube they added have condition issues.  Unsightly would be my term.

Avatar
Old Guns
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 107
Member Since:
December 26, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
February 16, 2020 - 6:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The wards pictures look very deceiving compared to the Gunbroker versions.

THIS ALL STARTED WITH JUST ONE GUN!

IMG_4414-Copy.JPG

 

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5810
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
February 16, 2020 - 7:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Not to disagree with any of you.  If you are ever interested about a gun on Ward’s sight the catalog they sell may have more pictures?  Also a phone call may answer some of your questions?  I buy ammo and other stuff and have had good luck.

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
February 16, 2020 - 7:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Chuck said
Also a phone call may answer some of your questions?   

Like, “who switched the barrel?”  Just kidding–no reason to believe they know the gun’s past history.  By the way, is this a ser. no. for which there’s no record at Cody?

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5810
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
February 16, 2020 - 7:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

clarence said

Like, “who switched the barrel?”  Just kidding–no reason to believe they know the gun’s past history.  By the way, is this a ser. no. for which there’s no record at Cody?  

Serial number only for this gun, no other records.  I doubt that Wards knows or maybe even cares like most dealers.  They take the word of the consignor and don’t research each gun.  Buyer beware everywhere.  Do your homework and don’t buy guns sight unseen.  Say thanks to Michael.  

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
February 16, 2020 - 8:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Chuck said   Serial number only for this gun, no other records.

What I figured–the fakers are smart enough to pick guns that can’t be documented.

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2493
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
February 16, 2020 - 11:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

To All,

The chance that Ward’s has anything to do with the alteration of this rifle is a long shot in my opinion.  It has been 7 long years since the rifle was last seen on Ginbroker.com.  IT may have had more than one or two homes since then.  

With regard to the either Ward’s or ANY auction house doing any sort of research on individual lots consigned to them that is NEVER going to happen.  Especially for a run of the mill example like this.  Imagine the amount of staff and the effort it would take to find anything beyond who the last owner was of the gun.  

The only way there can be a “data base” for something like this is for individuals to commit one heck of a lot of time to create it.  I spend 2 to 4 hours every single day (just about) looking at auctions, for sale sites, answering emails and working on this stuff.  And I have been at this for just over 7 years!!  You want a source?  Pick a model and start compiling data.  In about 5 years you will begin to have something that might catch the altered guns.  I will be more than happy to assist and share my experiences on how to do it with just about anyone who wants to start a project.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
rwsem
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 342
Member Since:
January 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
February 17, 2020 - 12:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I appreciate the dedication to your research.  I learned a few years ago that the folks on this forum will give you honest feedback (even if it hurts your feelings) and I think that’s invaluable. On more than one occasion, I haven’t bought a firearm based on what another member saw that I hadn’t. 

Technically, the glass is always full; half liquid, half air....

WACA #10293

Avatar
deerhunter
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2694
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
February 17, 2020 - 3:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

It’s nice that Ward’s finally discloses complete serial numbers in their auctions.  Until fairly recently they only posted partial serial numbers.  Definitely helps the survey takers and gives potential bidders the courtesy of a background check on a particular gun (if records exist).  Always thought it was stupid when sellers “X-out” digits of serial numbers in their ads like their protecting their social security number or something.

Don

Avatar
MWK
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 42
Member Since:
November 6, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
February 23, 2020 - 11:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

twobit said
To All,

The chance that Ward’s has anything to do with the alteration of this rifle is a long shot in my opinion.  It has been 7 long years since the rifle was last seen on Ginbroker.com.  IT may have had more than one or two homes since then.  

With regard to the either Ward’s or ANY auction house doing any sort of research on individual lots consigned to them that is NEVER going to happen.  Especially for a run of the mill example like this.  Imagine the amount of staff and the effort it would take to find anything beyond who the last owner was of the gun.  

The only way there can be a “data base” for something like this is for individuals to commit one heck of a lot of time to create it.  I spend 2 to 4 hours every single day (just about) looking at auctions, for sale sites, answering emails and working on this stuff.  And I have been at this for just over 7 years!!  You want a source?  Pick a model and start compiling data.  In about 5 years you will begin to have something that might catch the altered guns.  I will be more than happy to assist and share my experiences on how to do it with just about anyone who wants to start a project.

Michael  

Good work twobit

I checked Wards and they updated the descriptions with the info you gave so the bidders were aware and they still overpaid.  

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2493
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
February 24, 2020 - 12:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

We can only try.  And we must assume that the winning bidder actually read the description AFTER the new info was added and recognized that the gun was not in its original “as built” configuration.

Michaelk

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
rogertherelic
Santa Clara, CA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 931
Member Since:
January 27, 1992
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
February 24, 2020 - 4:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thank you Michael for the continued up dates.

I am also pleased to know that the “Nickel Steel” barrels are recognized as being “uncommon” and thus more collectible.  In 40 years I have managed two.  Serial #400784 a 22″ Round barrel take down (has shorter forend).  Serial #623492 24″ octagon with double set triggers.  Unfortunately to late to letter.      

Roger

 

92-Nickle-Steel-001.JPG92-Nickle-Steel-002.JPG

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: 1ned1, tsbccut, Chris D, Dave M.
Guest(s) 203
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6408
Chuck: 5810
steve004: 5173
1873man: 4698
deerhunter: 2694
Big Larry: 2549
twobit: 2493
mrcvs: 2194
Maverick: 2030
Newest Members:
iiak32484
Winchester 1892
Temomar83
ross
Model94-2025
R.E. Moore
sjGUESTEST
WindsurfAruba
cedar swamp savage
tradecraft
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14717
Posts: 131653

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9985
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation