Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 1892 32.20
Avatar
rwsem
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 343
Member Since:
January 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 2, 2018 - 9:54 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Thought I stumbled onto a circa 1919, 32WCF that someone listed as a 32.20, but sadly, no.  I think the WCF designation was used until the ’60s and I’m guessing the front sight is aftermarket….  Still might buy it just because I like the look.  Probably not, though.  I’m guessing the original barrel was toast and a previous owner used what they could get.  Found it interesting enough to post the pictures:

Regards, Ron

1059454_11.JPGImage Enlarger

1059454_12.JPGImage Enlarger
1059454_13.JPGImage Enlarger
1059454_14.JPGImage Enlarger
1059454_15.JPGImage Enlarger
1059454_01.JPGImage Enlarger
1059454_02.JPGImage Enlarger
1059454_03.JPGImage Enlarger
1059454_04.JPGImage Enlarger
1059454_05.JPGImage Enlarger
1059454_06.JPGImage Enlarger
1059454_07.JPGImage Enlarger
1059454_08.JPGImage Enlarger
1059454_09.JPGImage Enlarger
1059454_10.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

Technically, the glass is always full; half liquid, half air....

WACA #10293

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12985
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 2, 2018 - 4:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Ron,

Winchester dropped the “W.C.F.” and changed it to “32-20 WIN.” in June of the year 1948. It was later shortened to “32 WIN.”

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2505
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 2, 2018 - 8:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Ron,

LOTS of thing wrong with that rifle!!   The barrel has no Winchester markings on it.  The fore end is a carbine style but there is no saddle ring on the receiver.  The butt stock is not original to the gun.  And the whole pile of pieces has been refinished.  I would pass on it at at any price.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Ron S
Guest
Guests
4
October 2, 2018 - 9:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Yep, agree 100%,

, already passed….   I just like a rifle with a short magazine…..

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bill Hockett, tionesta1, TXGunNut, Michael B., Edward Kitner
Guest(s) 262
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6465
Chuck: 5873
steve004: 5209
1873man: 4703
deerhunter: 2711
Big Larry: 2559
twobit: 2505
mrcvs: 2213
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
WinKorm94
Wallyg703
GunLegacy
tcwyb
spikemiller
ob98
Ricky Summer
Peter Cipollini
Jhark
Oldtimer52
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14813
Posts: 132568

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10050
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation