Log In
June 26, 2013
Offline
48 bids at $2,825 and still going. Was hoping this would have been a sleeper with the false refinish assessment, but not so…Never a good deal on Gunbroker.
March 21, 2011
Offline
Wow. Both bidders must have read Bert’s review.
Darrin
November 8, 2011
Offline
Trying to get to 5k. After a thorough review of the barrel markings, I convinced it’s a remarked barrel. The final piece of evidence, aside from the marking on the left side being slightly out of position, is a small remnant of the original caliber mark still on the barrel. Not easy to see but it’s there.
November 8, 2011
Offline
Here’s the pic. Notice the little piece of the dash that is behind the caliber
November 8, 2011
Offline
Here’s another issue. Compare the gunbroker gun’s marking position to a 1932 94 barrel in 32 WS. Look at where the markings are relative to the rear dovetail.
June 26, 2013
Offline
Ended with 77 bids at $4,575.
June 26, 2013
Offline
sb said
Here’s another issue. Compare the gunbroker gun’s marking position to a 1932 94 barrel in 32 WS. Look at where the markings are relative to the rear dovetail.
The top of the 5’s look a little bit too short and funky to me as well. If I were the winning bidder, the first thing I’d do is pull the forearm and check the caliber marking on the underside of the barrel. LSB has a 30-day money back guarantee.
November 8, 2011
Offline
deerhunter said
sb said
Here’s another issue. Compare the gunbroker gun’s marking position to a 1932 94 barrel in 32 WS. Look at where the markings are relative to the rear dovetail.
The top of the 5’s look a little bit too short and funky to me as well. If I were the winning bidder, the first thing I’d do is pull the forearm and check the caliber marking on the underside of the barrel. LSB has a 30-day money back guarantee.
I hope no one here bought it.
April 30, 2023
Offline
I came back to that final price and was like WOW… good catch on that sliver of caliber marking (dash) leftover. Sometimes I still feel like a beginner, but I’ve come a long way considering there are folks out there bidding on this kind of stuff.
June 26, 2013
Offline
Also, check out the ramp front sight on the subject carbine vs. this other very closely produced 1932 carbine in 30 WCF. Notice there are no grooved provisions for attaching a sight hood on the early first-produced carbines, but there is on the “38-55” questionable carbine from around the same timeframe.
Here are the links to both carbines:
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/1091394002
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/1091394002
Don
1 Guest(s)
