Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4598
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
November 27, 2018 - 5:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Michael, all we are saying is that this gun has lost most of it’s value to a collector.  People should buy what they like.  This gun is not worth $1,000 on the resale market.

Avatar
South Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1042
Member Since:
March 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
22
November 28, 2018 - 12:09 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Im not trying to knock the gun, its just got a lot of history with how it started and how it is now.  For a shooter, couldnt ask for better, just a better price. One thing Im curious about is whether it was originally pistol grip or not and if the receiver blue and lower tang blue have matching wear, unfortunately there are no pics of the lower tang and receiver.  If it didnt have the proof on the receiver it might be worth the time to find the right barrel, some original wood, and everything else to bring it back to how it was originally, but at what gain beyond having an early originally configured gun.   If the letter stated an R/R then your options for a barrel would be expanded a bit insofar as the proof on the receiver is concerned, but then again, what is gained.  What has not diminished is the utility value of the gun and there are folks out there that in spite of the changes, still find it or other guns like that appealing.  But for a discriminating collector or an orientalist, its a pass.  To each is own in the final analysis.  Just depends on what type of gun enthusiast you tend to be, there is no right or wrong about it.

DSC_0245-Copy-3.JPG

1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member

"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4598
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
23
November 28, 2018 - 12:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

Chuck said
Bert what do you mean about the ammo being available up to the 1950’s?  Black powder?  I have Winchester 38-55 ammo made in the last 10 years.  

Chuck,

No, not black powder.  I believe that Winchester discontinued loading the 38-55 with BP pre-WW I.  Winchester factory loaded new 38-55 smokeless powder ammo into the 1950s, then discontinued it for a period of time.  When Winchester began manufacturing Commemorative Model 94s in 38-55, they reintroduced ammo for them.  Current modern manufactured 38-55 ammo does not use the same bullet diameter as the original BP and early smokeless powder ammo (.375 vs. .379). I am not sure when Winchester made the change to the .375 bullet diameter, but it probably coincided with the introduction of the Model 94 Big Bore in the late 1970s.

Bert  

Bert I’ll have to did out a box and measure the diameter.  Not really concerned about it.  I buy this ammo for the brass.  I get to shoot it once then reload it.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: deerhunter, Tom D, Bill Yadlosky
Guest(s) 25
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6368
TXGunNut: 5034
Chuck: 4598
1873man: 4322
steve004: 4250
Big Larry: 2344
twobit: 2295
mrcvs: 1726
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12760
Posts: 111146

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1766
Members: 8853
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation