June 26, 2013
OfflineI admit I don’t know a whole lot about the 1873’s, but I would think that Winchester would not want the address to be obscured. The seller does mention that the wood may have been replaced–maybe the forearm wood is a replacement and shorter than the original, therefore, moving the barrel band closer to the receiver? Here’s the link:
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=548400204
May 2, 2009
OfflineWell it took me a while to figure this one out but it finally hit me. I blow up the barrel address and that is not a 73 barrel on it. It has the wrong barrel address. It has a October 14 1884 date, it should be October 16 1880. My guess is its 92 barrel.
Bob
WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's

Email: [email protected]
March 20, 2010
OfflineI saw the front sight too and its not for a 92. It looks like the later style 73 carbine sight. Madis mentions a shipment of 92 carbines that went to Brazil and they were having trouble with parts so 73 barrels, buttplates, sights, bands, and magazine tubes (page 383). May be a 92 that the barrel was parted from to make the 73 carbine captioned?? Who knows. The barrel address is as Bob mentioned for a 92.
1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member
"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington
May 2, 2009
OfflineI think to answer the questions this gun brings up you would need to have a hands on inspection and look under the barrel to see what it really is. It can’t of been manufactured like that since its a 1883 gun.
Bob
WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's

Email: [email protected]
June 26, 2013
Offline1892takedown said
I saw the front sight too and its not for a 92. It looks like the later style 73 carbine sight. Madis mentions a shipment of 92 carbines that went to Brazil and they were having trouble with parts so 73 barrels, buttplates, sights, bands, and magazine tubes (page 383). May be a 92 that the barrel was parted from to make the 73 carbine captioned?? Who knows. The barrel address is as Bob mentioned for a 92.
Here’s one of those 1892 carbines you mentioned. Wish it were mine.
1 Guest(s)
        
Log In
