Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
First year 1892 odd markings
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 202
Member Since:
January 28, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 8, 2019 - 8:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Posting for a friend who has a first year 1892 standard oct brl rifle in 44wcf. There is a number 4 stamped on both sides of forearm near receiver, on top of barrel in front of receiver, rear side of receiver and on the side of the stock. Any thoughts from the gallery?received_3016715251696513.jpegImage Enlargerreceived_492862614665340.jpegImage Enlargerreceived_486496615557209.jpegImage Enlargerreceived_2430246390636861.jpegImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2298
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 9, 2019 - 2:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hello Mark,

I have looked at more than 13,000 Model 1892 rifles and have not seen similar marks to those.  They are most likely “rack marks” which were applied when an entity had numerous identical rifles and wanted to easily identify one from another.  Can I get the ful lSN of the gun so that  Ican add it into my survey of the 1892’s?

thanks

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 202
Member Since:
January 28, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 9, 2019 - 4:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Michael,

Thanks for the reply. Rack number was my thought but odd marked on all major parts. Serial is 19298.

Mark

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2298
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 9, 2019 - 8:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Mark,

One would have to assume that the rifle was marked repeatedly so that when disassembled the parts would be put back together into the same rifle.  Thus, the entity who marked it had at lest 4 of them.  Is there a small set screw on the right side of the front sight base?  Can you please post pics of the tang stamp and the barrel address?

Thanks

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 202
Member Since:
January 28, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
December 9, 2019 - 9:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Michael,
I will see about getting you the info.

What can you tell me about 1892s with octagon vs. round barrels? I assume octagon was standard and more guns are so fitted? Do you have statistics as to one vs the other? Thanks,

Mark

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2298
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
December 9, 2019 - 10:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Mark,

Actually, both the round and octagon are considered standard configurations in the catalogs.   The round barrel, solid frame, full mag rifle cost $18.00 from it’s introduction until at least 1916.  The octagon barrel version was $1.50 more.  I have not calculated the % of OB vs RB in quite a while but recall it to be about 30% of the sporting rifles were round barrel.

I hope that helps

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6368
TXGunNut: 5034
Chuck: 4598
1873man: 4322
steve004: 4250
Big Larry: 2344
twobit: 2298
mrcvs: 1726
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12762
Posts: 111155

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1766
Members: 8854
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation