Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
First ‘94
Avatar
eldplanko
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
July 2, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
July 2, 2022 - 3:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Just picked up my first ‘94, always wanted one, S/N 294XXX. See pics below. I’m no expert on these, would would be happy to hear for the group their impressions. Also, open to hearing whether it’s worth taking down for deep cleaning, or at least how far to go. Any watch-outs on these old guns. I’m fairly competent as an amateur gunsmith, but definitely wouldn’t want to mar anything.

High quality pics linked below, I can get better shows of any areas if folks are interested. Trying to add pics below.

Thanks!

View post on imgur.com

[Image Can Not Be Found]View post on imgur.com

” width=”3964″ alt=”” />

Avatar
Ken Windeler
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 70
Member Since:
June 24, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
July 2, 2022 - 5:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Unless it is all junked up you might not need to take it apart. The action is pretty much open so Gun Scrubber might be sufficient for a good cleaning. This Carbine has a rifle stock on it. I’m too lazy to look up the serial # to date it but looks like a Post War Model 94

How is the bore?

Apparently, this is a barreled rifle.

Avatar
Tedk
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 735
Member Since:
August 27, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
July 2, 2022 - 6:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The gun was serialized in 1906.

Don’t take it apart, doesn’t look like it needs a deep cleaning. I’d just work on it with a couple q-tips to clean up the nooks and crannies, run a couple oiled patches thru the bore and wipe it down.

“If you can’t convince them, confuse them”

President Harry S. Truman

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12863
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
July 2, 2022 - 6:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

We ask that complete serial numbers be provided when asking for information.  The partial serial number you provided indicates that it is a late 1904 or early 1905 production Model 1894 Sporting Rifle.

The back half of the rifle shows a standard Sporting Rifle configuration.  The front half (barrel, magazine tube, and stock) were originally on a 1946 – 1948 production Model 94 Flat-band Carbine and are not original to the gun.  Accordingly, what you have is a “Frankenchester”.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
eldplanko
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
July 2, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
July 2, 2022 - 6:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said
We ask that complete serial numbers be provided when asking for information.  The partial serial number you provided indicates that it is a late 1904 or early 1905 production Model 1894 Sporting Rifle.

The back half of the rifle shows a standard Sporting Rifle configuration.  The front half (barrel, magazine tube, and stock) were originally on a 1946 – 1948 production Model 94 Flat-band Carbine and are not original to the gun.  Accordingly, what you have is a “Frankenchester”.

Bert

  

Sorry… didn’t know if posting serial numbers were sensitive info or not… 294166… anyone can feel free to add info on this rifle to their databases or historical information collections.

Avatar
eldplanko
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
July 2, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
July 2, 2022 - 6:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Also… I pulled the buttstock, inside it’s stamped 294… doesn’t match last 3 on receiver S/N…. Might that have been swapped out also?

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12863
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
July 2, 2022 - 7:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

eldplanko said

Bert H. said

We ask that complete serial numbers be provided when asking for information.  The partial serial number you provided indicates that it is a late 1904 or early 1905 production Model 1894 Sporting Rifle.

The back half of the rifle shows a standard Sporting Rifle configuration.  The front half (barrel, magazine tube, and stock) were originally on a 1946 – 1948 production Model 94 Flat-band Carbine and are not original to the gun.  Accordingly, what you have is a “Frankenchester”.

Bert

  

Sorry… didn’t know if posting serial numbers were sensitive info or not… 294166… anyone can feel free to add info on this rifle to their databases or historical information collections.  

S/N 294166 identifies it as a January 1906 production Model 1894.  When evaluating any old Winchester, the serial number is a critical piece of information that enables a more accurate assessment of the gun in question.

In regards to your Model 1894, it is positively a piece-parts rifle.  The assembly numbers stamped on the various parts never match the serial number on a Model 1894.

Stripping this rifle down for a detailed cleaning will not have any negative affect on its value, as it is purely just a “shooter” grade gun.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
eldplanko
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
July 2, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
July 2, 2022 - 7:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

eldplanko said

Bert H. said

We ask that complete serial numbers be provided when asking for information.  The partial serial number you provided indicates that it is a late 1904 or early 1905 production Model 1894 Sporting Rifle.

The back half of the rifle shows a standard Sporting Rifle configuration.  The front half (barrel, magazine tube, and stock) were originally on a 1946 – 1948 production Model 94 Flat-band Carbine and are not original to the gun.  Accordingly, what you have is a “Frankenchester”.

Bert

  

Sorry… didn’t know if posting serial numbers were sensitive info or not… 294166… anyone can feel free to add info on this rifle to their databases or historical information collections.

  

Bert H. said
We ask that complete serial numbers be provided when asking for information.  The partial serial number you provided indicates that it is a late 1904 or early 1905 production Model 1894 Sporting Rifle.

The back half of the rifle shows a standard Sporting Rifle configuration.  The front half (barrel, magazine tube, and stock) were originally on a 1946 – 1948 production Model 94 Flat-band Carbine and are not original to the gun.  Accordingly, what you have is a “Frankenchester”.

Bert

  

Also, just pulled the forestock. Underside of barrel is stamped “.32 WS 47,” I guess that makes it a 1947 front end?

Avatar
eldplanko
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
July 2, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
July 2, 2022 - 7:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said

eldplanko said

Bert H. said

We ask that complete serial numbers be provided when asking for information.  The partial serial number you provided indicates that it is a late 1904 or early 1905 production Model 1894 Sporting Rifle.

The back half of the rifle shows a standard Sporting Rifle configuration.  The front half (barrel, magazine tube, and stock) were originally on a 1946 – 1948 production Model 94 Flat-band Carbine and are not original to the gun.  Accordingly, what you have is a “Frankenchester”.

Bert

  

Sorry… didn’t know if posting serial numbers were sensitive info or not… 294166… anyone can feel free to add info on this rifle to their databases or historical information collections.  

S/N 294166 identifies it as a January 1906 production Model 1894.  When evaluating any old Winchester, the serial number is a critical piece of information that enables a more accurate assessment of the gun in question.

In regards to your Model 1894, it is positively a piece-parts rifle.  The assembly numbers stamped on the various parts never match the serial number on a Model 1894.

Stripping this rifle down for a detailed cleaning will not have any negative affect on its value, as it is purely just a “shooter” grade gun.

Bert

  

Thanks for your rapid response and detective work!  I bought it for shooting… any historical value was upside!

Avatar
Ken Windeler
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 70
Member Since:
June 24, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
July 2, 2022 - 8:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

At first, I thought it was a Carbine with a rifle stock, but when I looked up the serial number and found the early production and it was not a saddle ring it must be a rifle with a newer barrel.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12863
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
July 3, 2022 - 12:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

eldplanko said

Also, just pulled the forestock. Underside of barrel is stamped “.32 WS 47,” I guess that makes it a 1947 front end?  

Yes it does.  As I mentioned earlier, the front end came off of a Flat-band carbine.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: [email protected]
Guest(s) 150
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6406
Chuck: 5806
steve004: 5172
1873man: 4698
deerhunter: 2694
Big Larry: 2549
twobit: 2493
mrcvs: 2194
Maverick: 2029
Newest Members:
sjGUESTEST
WindsurfAruba
cedar swamp savage
tradecraft
Weida78
Alby
Lambeau
Larsmack
usmc1978
Otisman68
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14713
Posts: 131612

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9979
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation