Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Confusing Model 92
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 339
Member Since:
January 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 18, 2019 - 9:33 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I read an online description that stated 20″ round barrel, 1/2 magazine, Model 92, 38 WCF.  Naturally, I thought a SRC with a button mag in that caliber would be a nice addition.  Then I received these photos.  Since the Polishing Room Records don’t cover this SN, I’m left to speculate as to whether this is genuine.  Gut tells me no but thought I’d solicit input.  The wood looks refinished (could be freshly oiled?) and should belong on a SRC (w/ optional shotgun butt plate?) but there is no saddle ring on the frame. I speculate someone had a few pieces and cobbled together a functional carbine. But…. I am a novice and value the opinions of those on this forum. Regards, Ron

1064065_08.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_09.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_10.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_11.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_12.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_13.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_15.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_16.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_01.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_02.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_03.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_04.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_05.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_06.JPGImage Enlarger1064065_07.JPGImage Enlarger 

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

Technically, the glass is always full; half liquid, half air....

WACA #10293

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 491
Member Since:
January 19, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 18, 2019 - 10:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Out of my lane here, but the forearm and the stock look like they are from two different worlds.  The stock has not been around the horn and the forearm has.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2471
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 18, 2019 - 11:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hello Ron,

The rifle, actually a carbine, is for real.  The serial n umber equates to 1929 production.  The wood has absolutely been removed, sanded, and refinished.  The scratch/gouge on the left side of the forearms is a remnant of that activity.  The gun was ordered without a sling ring on the left side which, while not rare is certainly “uncommon.”  Additionally, the carbine was ordered with the shotgun butt with the fluted comb and a 2/3rds length magazine.  This assemblage with shotgun butts, shorter than full length and longer than button mags, and fluted combs are sometimes found between 1912 and the end of production.  This rifle is very late in the production run of the Model 92’s.  There were less than 1000 made after it.

Let me know if you have further questions.  I will be happy to try to answer them.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Maverick, pdog72, pine_worker, deerhunter, Bill Yadlosky, rbazinet
Guest(s) 42
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6133
Chuck: 5588
steve004: 5015
1873man: 4652
Big Larry: 2501
twobit: 2471
mrcvs: 2120
Maverick: 1919
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14389
Posts: 127900

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2017
Members: 9758
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation