Log In
Members
Home
Add Reply
Add Topic
I cam across an auction for a ’94 carbine, where the seller claims it is a 1960 made rifle with factory checkering. Looking at the pictures, I call “shenanigans”….. mostly because the checkering looks so janky. But….. the question arises, as I am far from a Winchester expert. Did Winchester offer checkering on pre-64 carbines? I know, from searching this forum, that you could get checkering on a rifle in the “Fancy sporting” configuration, or if you ordered it as a special feature. But, did Winchester factory checker carbines?
Link to auction:
Your instincts are correct, that’s not factory checkering.
“If you can’t convince them, confuse them”
President Harry S. Truman
Tedk said
Your instincts are correct, that’s not factory checkering.
Ditto.
Note also how “proud” the receiver, tang & buttplate are. Definitely (overly) sanded wood.
Notice how the checkering on the right side of the forearm runs downhill, The pattern is 1/4″ lower in the rear than the front.
Erin
OW1892 said
Ditto.
Note also how “proud” the receiver, tang & buttplate are. Definitely (overly) sanded wood.
I did not notice that. I wasn’t thinking of bidding on this gun, I just thought it looked funny so posted here for confirmation. Good catch though….. I got burned once before on a vintage shotgun because of “artfully” presented pictures that hid that very flaw. The seller eventually made good though, and if I were seriously considering bidding on this gun I would have looked harder (one hopes!).
Erin Grivicich said
Notice how the checkering on the right side of the forearm runs downhill, The pattern is 1/4″ lower in the rear than the front.
Erin
I did notice that, just forgot to mention it specifically…… instead I used the all-encompassing technical term “janky”. 
November 7, 2015
Offline
Nice enough shooter, blew right past the shooter price point tho. Wait for the next one, John. Good eye.
Mike
TXGunNut said
Nice enough shooter, blew right past the shooter price point tho. Wait for the next one, John. Good eye.
Mike
Naw – three is enough 
……..Unless I come across a nice carbine in 38-55. I have a nice special order rifle in 38-55, but I sure would like a nice carbine in my collection!
November 7, 2015
Offline
John D. said
TXGunNut said
Nice enough shooter, blew right past the shooter price point tho. Wait for the next one, John. Good eye.
Mike
Naw – three is enough
Three is a nice start. Two is all it takes to get things started, they just start showing up after that. 
If you don’t believe me just ask around, lol. I scored a SRC in 38-55 in Cody last week. Not much condition but lots of character. Bore looks good after a good cleaning and I found some 38-55 loads on the shelf. I’m not a 94 collector but I’m a foster parent to more than I care to admit.
Mike
TXGunNut said
John D. said
TXGunNut said
Nice enough shooter, blew right past the shooter price point tho. Wait for the next one, John. Good eye.
Mike
Naw – three is enough
Three is a nice start. Two is all it takes to get things started, they just start showing up after that.
Mike
I have a nice 30-30, a decent .32WS, and a really pretty 25-35 carbine. I need a 32-40 and a 38-55 to complete the collection of carbines. Not too hot for a 32-40, but I really, really want a nice 38-55, so if any of you following this thread have one for sale, shoot me a PM.
I’m partial to the 1892’s myself, and have the complete carbine set. Only missing a nice 44-40 rifle to have the whole pile. 🙂
1 Guest(s)
