Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
An interesting letter
Avatar
jsgwoodsman
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 315
Member Since:
September 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 16, 2023 - 7:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

I came across this Winchester letter and found it interesting that it mentions the rear barrel sight being omitted, and also wondered what “target” would have meant. 

Maybe these are not uncommon factory ledger entries, but I don’t remember seeing either before. 

 

Any thoughts?

 

https://i.imgur.com/9bx2RoL.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Henry Mero
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1419
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 16, 2023 - 7:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I Don’t know what vintage or what model You have , but in 1902 a filler piece for the rear sight was .25 cents extra. It was not rare but somewhat uncommon. There was some discussion on here a little while back about “target”. 

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4718
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
October 16, 2023 - 7:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Last week we talked about the “Target”. The “No rear seat” is when they have a tang sight and don’t want a dovetail for a rear barrel sight. I have on e like that in a 73 and matt barrel.

https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/m1886-target-rifle-as-per-cody-letter/#p137851

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
jsgwoodsman
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 315
Member Since:
September 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
October 16, 2023 - 7:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Aha!

that is indeed the same rifle. Not mine. Just very appealing .

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5238
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
October 16, 2023 - 11:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

jsgwoodsman said
Aha!

that is indeed the same rifle. Not mine. Just very appealing .

  

But it could be.  Looks like it hasn’t sold yet.  Yes, it is very appealing.  We’re not the only guys here that think so Wink

Avatar
oldcrankyyankee
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 955
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
October 16, 2023 - 11:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

steve004 said

jsgwoodsman said

Aha!

that is indeed the same rifle. Not mine. Just very appealing .

  

But it could be.  Looks like it hasn’t sold yet.  Yes, it is very appealing.  We’re not the only guys here that think so Wink

  

Looks like this one is gaining quite the following.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4920
Currently Online: Rick Hill, wally, cj57, 1873man, Thomas Beckwith, btbell, Kris Miller, Rick C, eddixon
Guest(s) 592
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6568
Chuck: 5943
steve004: 5238
1873man: 4717
deerhunter: 2717
Big Larry: 2567
twobit: 2514
mrcvs: 2217
Maverick: 2043
Newest Members:
eddixon
Rifleman Rifle
tourman40
rifleman
Surfertim
6564yankees
Fox Creek
kellswater
Gary
Harper 1886
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14887
Posts: 133432

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10112
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation