Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
An interesting letter
Avatar
jsgwoodsman
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 309
Member Since:
September 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 16, 2023 - 7:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

I came across this Winchester letter and found it interesting that it mentions the rear barrel sight being omitted, and also wondered what “target” would have meant. 

Maybe these are not uncommon factory ledger entries, but I don’t remember seeing either before. 

 

Any thoughts?

 

https://i.imgur.com/9bx2RoL.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Henry Mero
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1410
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 16, 2023 - 7:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I Don’t know what vintage or what model You have , but in 1902 a filler piece for the rear sight was .25 cents extra. It was not rare but somewhat uncommon. There was some discussion on here a little while back about “target”. 

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4703
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 16, 2023 - 7:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Last week we talked about the “Target”. The “No rear seat” is when they have a tang sight and don’t want a dovetail for a rear barrel sight. I have on e like that in a 73 and matt barrel.

https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/m1886-target-rifle-as-per-cody-letter/#p137851

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
jsgwoodsman
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 309
Member Since:
September 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
October 16, 2023 - 7:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Aha!

that is indeed the same rifle. Not mine. Just very appealing .

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5209
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
October 16, 2023 - 11:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

jsgwoodsman said
Aha!

that is indeed the same rifle. Not mine. Just very appealing .

  

But it could be.  Looks like it hasn’t sold yet.  Yes, it is very appealing.  We’re not the only guys here that think so Wink

Avatar
oldcrankyyankee
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 945
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
October 16, 2023 - 11:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

steve004 said

jsgwoodsman said

Aha!

that is indeed the same rifle. Not mine. Just very appealing .

  

But it could be.  Looks like it hasn’t sold yet.  Yes, it is very appealing.  We’re not the only guys here that think so Wink

  

Looks like this one is gaining quite the following.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: wally, JWA, antler1, Big Larry, btbell, SureShot, GhostRyder5
Guest(s) 327
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6459
Chuck: 5868
steve004: 5209
1873man: 4703
deerhunter: 2711
Big Larry: 2559
twobit: 2505
mrcvs: 2212
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
Ricky Summer
Peter Cipollini
Jhark
Oldtimer52
parkerposy
rayhobbs
WebleyScott
Task1
1886
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14810
Posts: 132542

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10045
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation