Log In
September 21, 2016
Offline
I came across this Winchester letter and found it interesting that it mentions the rear barrel sight being omitted, and also wondered what “target” would have meant.
Maybe these are not uncommon factory ledger entries, but I don’t remember seeing either before.
Any thoughts?
<img decoding="async" src="
View post on imgur.com” width=”1170″ alt=”
” />
December 21, 2006
Offline
I Don’t know what vintage or what model You have , but in 1902 a filler piece for the rear sight was .25 cents extra. It was not rare but somewhat uncommon. There was some discussion on here a little while back about “target”.
W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.
May 2, 2009
Offline
Last week we talked about the “Target”. The “No rear seat” is when they have a tang sight and don’t want a dovetail for a rear barrel sight. I have on e like that in a 73 and matt barrel.
Bob
WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's
Email: [email protected]
September 21, 2016
Offline
Aha!
that is indeed the same rifle. Not mine. Just very appealing .
November 19, 2006
Offline
jsgwoodsman said
Aha!that is indeed the same rifle. Not mine. Just very appealing .
But it could be. Looks like it hasn’t sold yet. Yes, it is very appealing. We’re not the only guys here that think so 
February 17, 2022
Offline
steve004 said
jsgwoodsman said
Aha!
that is indeed the same rifle. Not mine. Just very appealing .
But it could be. Looks like it hasn’t sold yet. Yes, it is very appealing. We’re not the only guys here that think so
Looks like this one is gaining quite the following.
1 Guest(s)
