Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
A restored '86 in .50-100-450 (a.k.a. the older I get the less sense I can make from the world around me).
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5064
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
May 25, 2019 - 4:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

https://www.amoskeagauction.com/116/169.php

This rifle is acknowledged to not be original (non-original finish and a “custom” barrel).  I can see why someone might want to make a rifle like this up.  What I just can’t wrap my head around is the barrel address.  What has been going on here?  First off, “neatly hand engraved barrel address and caliber designation.”  And, I would (partially agree).  The caliber designation does look neat as do parts of the barrel address.  But what has happened here?  And how? And why?  Sections of the address stamped and sections (non-neatly) hand engraved?  Obviously, money was spent on this rifle.  Many thousands I am sure.  Having that barrel made must not have been cheap.  How can you do a project like this and finish it off with an aspect that is so very unsightly? It really does make me queasy to look at that barrel address.   The only thing I do understand is the motivation to sell it off.  As far as the hammer (plus the juice) price, I’m back to not being able to understand. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5678
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
May 25, 2019 - 9:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I think part of the address is original.  The less than neat parts may have been an attempt to re-stamp the parts that were messed up during the refinishing?  Nice shooter.  A real 50-100-450 is extremely expensive.  Only the builder of this gun could answer your questions.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 347
Member Since:
February 18, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
May 25, 2019 - 10:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I really know nothing about the value of such an 1886. I do recognize from personal experience, effects of entrusting gun work to others. Gun returned far from expectations. Sounds like such scenario in material cited.

Worst personal scenario. Local experienced & credible gunsmith with vg rep. Going into his own business. My otherwise decent S&W 3rd Model prewar 44 Spl to be replated. Back months later… with cheap, overbuffed blue! Paying nothing, but potentially nice refurb gun; ruined. Him also o/b within first year. (Sometimes best technicians, worst businessmen!) Several other ‘pesky’ episodes over the years. Fortunately, nothing to match!
More often, as here, viewing interesting gun and head shaking. Why in hell…? Pass or buy cheap. At least it appears the referenced seller here, basically up front.
My theory!
John

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6247
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 26, 2019 - 12:50 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Nice rifle as long as you don’t look too closely. Unfortunately it’s a good chance someone paid more than the selling price to make it look that way. I hope the new owner likes it.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4671
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
May 26, 2019 - 1:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I enlarged the barrel address and the caliber and I’m guessing this was the first job the engraver did. Wow! I think with the barrel address he had a remnant image of “Winchester” to follow but the rest of the line he had to create from scratch.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 94
Member Since:
September 14, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
May 26, 2019 - 11:43 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Well, I can admit to being one of these people. I had a 20% 1886 in 45-90 which I sent to Doug Turnbull to be restored. I figured as long as it was not going to be original, I might as well go all the way. So, it came back to me as a deluxe 1886 in 50EX. Will I ever get my money back, probably not. But I have a beautiful Winchester 1886 that I could never afford if it was original.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5064
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
May 27, 2019 - 11:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Richard Pike said
Well, I can admit to being one of these people. I had a 20% 1886 in 45-90 which I sent to Doug Turnbull to be restored. I figured as long as it was not going to be original, I might as well go all the way. So, it came back to me as a deluxe 1886 in 50EX. Will I ever get my money back, probably not. But I have a beautiful Winchester 1886 that I could never afford if it was original.  

Richard –

I’ll bet your barrel address looks a whole lot better than this one.  As I said, although what was done to this rifle isn’t exactly my cup of tea, I do enjoy various Winchesters I have that I appreciate as shooters vs. collector items.  And, if a person wanted a .50-100-450 to shoot and hunt, something like this might just work out – for a fraction of what an original would cost.   I could easily live with this rifle for that purpose, were it not for that barrel address.  As I said, it just makes me queasy.  I guess we all have our limits in what and how much we can forgive.

Appreciate everyone’s thoughts.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Chuck, antler1, Louis Luttrell, Bryan Austin, Bill Yadlosky, SureShot
Guest(s) 139
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6247
Chuck: 5676
steve004: 5064
1873man: 4671
Big Larry: 2519
twobit: 2487
mrcvs: 2154
Maverick: 1989
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14534
Posts: 129562

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2033
Members: 9854
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation