Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 68
Member Since:
August 25, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 11, 2014 - 9:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2087
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 12, 2014 - 2:43 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I believe this firearm dates from late 1915 or early 1916. Because of this, the barrel, in my opinion, has been replaced. The reason is because the large WINCHESTER logo, if I am correct, as discussed in another post, was not used until later (I believe in 1919). Also, the rear sight is no appropriate for a gun of this era, there are screws missing, the wood to metal fit is poor, and a lot of wear is evident.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 378
Member Since:
July 7, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 12, 2014 - 5:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

DEEREHART
I could not get your link to work so here it is again. The receiver is in the right s/n range but, as mrcvs stated, the barrel is wrong.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=393041773
this link does not seem to work either 😕 9:34 Now it works. must be my computer again 🙄

Paul

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12361
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 12, 2014 - 7:26 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Doug,

The serial number is definitely in the correct range (March 1916), and there were several other Spruce Guns in the near vicinity that do not have the ordnance marks either, but they do have the "J.C. ’17" marking on them.

As mentioned by the other fellows, the barrel is not original, nor is the cut down mag tube.

I believe that it was an original Spruce Gun, but it is in very rough shape.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 68
Member Since:
August 25, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 12, 2014 - 9:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks guys I did not think it looked correct. I will just have to keep looking to find a better one within my budget. 🙁

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6039
Chuck: 5467
steve004: 4931
1873man: 4612
Big Larry: 2494
twobit: 2446
mrcvs: 2087
Maverick: 1860
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14244
Posts: 126267

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2004
Members: 9697
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation