Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 94 25-35 Carbine - 1945 DOM?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 347
Member Since:
February 18, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 13, 2013 - 9:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Winchester Model 94 standard carbine (Non SR & not flat band) in 25-35, SN 13350x (or plus another "x" too, I don’t have it in front of me now – sorry). Would that be 1945 manufacture?
Thanks for info & Happy Holidays to all!

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2354
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 13, 2013 - 9:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

My M94 32 Special # 1,327,444, pretty close to your XX carbine, was in the polishing room, 4-1-1942. I would say yours was a 1942 carbine too. Big Larry

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10852
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 13, 2013 - 10:43 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

May 1942… I would like to have the complete serial number for my research survey when you get the chance. I would also like to verify the UT marking, and if it is drilled & tapped for a tang sight.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 347
Member Since:
February 18, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 13, 2013 - 11:42 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for the info! Bert, I will try to get the full SN info to you today via my phone. I am almost certain that it is not D&T for a tang sight so assume not unless I indicate otherwise in my next comm. Also this rifle wears the simple checkered steel butt plate. But please enlighten me, what is "UT"? I am working from my collection file photos and XL spreadsheet, so hopefully they will reveal that requested info. Otherwise, it would be sometime in the spring before I have it again in my hands. This the result of an eclectic lifestyle and resulting vicarious collection management/research!
Again Happy Holidays to all!

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10852
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
December 13, 2013 - 12:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

"UT" is short for Upper Tang.

The UT on your carbine should have the Type-7 marking, and I would expect it to be drilled & tapped for a tang sight, but it might not be. Thus far, I have (237) 1942 vintage Model 94 serial numbers in my survey, and the earliest one I have found without a drilled & tapped UT is serial number 1338317.

The butt plate you mention is not correct for a 1942 vintage Model 94 Carbine. Winchester did not introduce that style of butt plate until they were well into the 1946 production year.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2354
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
December 13, 2013 - 2:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Yep, the buttplate should be the same as a M55. Big Larry

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 347
Member Since:
February 18, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
December 13, 2013 - 7:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

First, sorry gentlemen. Ive made a bit of a mess of it. Wrong SN. Correct is 1344501. Bert, tang IS tapped. So much for senior memory!
Advise if further is deisired.
Happy holidays!

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10852
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
December 14, 2013 - 12:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

OK, that does make it a 1945 production gun (October). However, it should not have a drilled & tapped UT or be marked. It should also have a serrated steel butt plate (like the Model 55).

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 347
Member Since:
February 18, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
December 14, 2013 - 1:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for the info Bert! The tang is completely unmarked. If you would likr, I can email photos of it. I dont know how to post such here. Might be a few days.
Best!

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10852
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
December 14, 2013 - 9:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Please send pictures to me at [email protected]

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: Rick C
Guest(s) 187
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6388
TXGunNut: 5057
Chuck: 4601
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2354
twobit: 2306
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12788
Posts: 111401

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1770
Members: 8873
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation