Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 64 D&T Date
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 347
Member Since:
February 18, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 12, 2013 - 8:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I understand that the model 64 Win was drilled & tapped for receiver sight as standard by about 1938 or so. Correct?
Thanks for confirmation or correction!

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 12, 2013 - 10:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Winchester began drilling & tapping the Model 64 for the Lyman No. 56 receiver sight in August of 1933 (circa serial number 1091800). By serial number 1094100 all of them were drilled and tapped until the 219 Zipper was introduced. Approximately 25% of the Zipper rifles are not drilled & tapped.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 347
Member Since:
February 18, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 13, 2013 - 9:10 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Great news! I have several 64 rifles I’ve owned for years. All are D&T and until recently I was assuming the comparable model 94 timeline of early fifties was valid for them. No wonder the work looked factory.
This information amounts to an Xmas surprise gift for me!
Another question coming, but that for yet another thread.
Thanks Bert & Happy Holidays!

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 13, 2013 - 10:46 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I would like to get the information on your Model 64s for my research survey. You can contact me via a PM, or send me an email.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 264
Member Since:
November 17, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
December 13, 2013 - 5:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Does anyone have an idea why Winchester D&T’s the 64’s but not the 94’s until much later? Even after deleting the tang sight holes.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
December 14, 2013 - 12:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

CJS57 said
Does anyone have an idea why Winchester D&T’s the 64’s but not the 94’s until much later? Even after deleting the tang sight holes.

I suspect that it was because the Model 64 was a rifle, whereas the Model 94 at that that time was only offered as a Carbine. Also, the Model 64 was a higher grade (more expensive) gun than the Model 94. Winchester began drilling & tapping the Model 94 as a standard featrure nearly 20-years later than they did for the Model 64.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: 86Win, 12 NUT
Guest(s) 227
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6388
TXGunNut: 5057
Chuck: 4601
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2351
twobit: 2306
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12787
Posts: 111392

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8872
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation