Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14208
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineIt sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14208
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineA standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: rogertherelic, stavok, Steven Gabrielli, Randy3590
Guest(s) 292
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7284
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6631
steve004: 5629
1873man: 4894
deerhunter: 2968
twobit: 2674
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2429
Maverick: 2180
Newest Members:
Michael O
Pinkerton
DanellBoone75
Jackthedog
mgdecap
JudahTheKidd
rickyroper
RLTexan
DreithVader
Steve Tucker
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15784
Posts: 143751
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10623
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
