Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14365
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineIt sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14365
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineA standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: mrcvs, 426crown, TXGunNut, TR, 86Win
Guest(s) 330
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7381
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6715
steve004: 5674
1873man: 4902
deerhunter: 2992
twobit: 2700
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2448
Maverick: 2186
Newest Members:
Overthrust
SonomaRed
Jerrysims12
RobertLeigh62
TonyB
mbscdh
Lake
Toeknee165
Hangfire51
BowmanX
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15928
Posts: 145104
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10728
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
