Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14586
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineIt sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14586
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineA standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: MidwestCrisis, No hard feelings
Guest(s) 510
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7525
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6813
steve004: 5757
1873man: 4962
deerhunter: 3022
twobit: 2724
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2500
Zebulon: 2243
Newest Members:
fjbradford1
KYMason
Harleymtnman
CecilRM03
Rd1953
haksaeng
Umar
Nickhart12
Ace Larsen
jacobmorrisette
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 16109
Posts: 147319
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10884
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
