Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13477
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineIt sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13477
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineA standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: Rick C
Guest(s) 368
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6778
Chuck: 6115
steve004: 5325
1873man: 4782
deerhunter: 2782
Big Larry: 2578
twobit: 2570
mrcvs: 2285
Maverick: 2083
Newest Members:
mentze
Top
TamasW
MinnesotaGreg
RHudson59
JB2026
DIESEL DOUG
Tony Short
Michael Polachek
Cotyr8807
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15182
Posts: 136629
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10278
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
