Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14282
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineIt sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14282
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineA standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: cj57, Nevada Paul, Steven Gabrielli, dbro, Pwog, DQL5150, Glshuck, UncleJoe
Guest(s) 321
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7341
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6691
steve004: 5647
1873man: 4896
deerhunter: 2971
twobit: 2685
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2441
Maverick: 2184
Newest Members:
Windsor22
Cook
UncleJoe
Super X1 DK.
ELTON
1790skeeter
Khw64r
SFXLabradors
JT
Pinkmoose
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15859
Posts: 144448
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10672
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
