Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14700
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineIt sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14700
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineA standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: steve004, Green River Gus, MidwestCrisis, Fedelsur
Guest(s) 370
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7601
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6857
steve004: 5817
1873man: 4982
deerhunter: 3055
twobit: 2734
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2512
Zebulon: 2348
Newest Members:
Jaegermeister
Hookturn
TOM U
MattA
Chet911J
Old Joe
Ronald B
glykhol
SilverEagle
Aawwshoot
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 16230
Posts: 148472
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10946
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
