Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14913
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineIt sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14913
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineA standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: Rick Hill, slk, antler1, deerhunter, Mark Douglas, Tedk, Anthony #5411, markone1966, oldcrankyyankee, SureShot, Turbo 1886
Guest(s) 618
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7719
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6910
steve004: 5876
1873man: 5001
deerhunter: 3077
twobit: 2760
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2538
Zebulon: 2492
Newest Members:
Vogt Auction
Malamute
murph
jwww
Rodney Swillie
Teemdoc
Craig Sidwell
IndianCent
Hightime
Corvette2008
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 16421
Posts: 150476
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 11057
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
