Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14039
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineIt sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14039
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineA standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: mrcvs, Mark Douglas, DEEREHART, MidwestCrisis
Guest(s) 633
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7165
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6506
steve004: 5543
1873man: 4858
deerhunter: 2876
twobit: 2653
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2379
Maverick: 2167
Newest Members:
HellsBay18
Fiorip
bStrongTO
Coldtex
JR1961
Cory Higgins
robcvtflyer
Hibbi
JCluver
Ken Espenshade
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15624
Posts: 141873
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10525
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
