Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13587
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineIt sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13587
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineA standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6865
Chuck: 6192
steve004: 5373
1873man: 4794
deerhunter: 2787
twobit: 2587
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2298
Maverick: 2095
Newest Members:
AMMO86
ssc518
XPLSV
djvernon
The Draw
MattSpencer
Bronco17
Edcamera
Rich44-40
Jacques Emond
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15278
Posts: 137708
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10343
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
