Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13967
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineIt sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13967
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineA standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 422
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 7104
Chuck: 6453
steve004: 5514
1873man: 4846
deerhunter: 2848
twobit: 2627
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2350
Maverick: 2156
Newest Members:
Tim I
triggeron
Grousehunter
BrickTamland
GaryS
Krazykarsen270
MacM
rum869
Garrett007
Mort
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15545
Posts: 141011
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10467
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
