
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12858
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005

It sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12858
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005

A standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bert H., 426crown, antler1, Anthony, Henry Mero, Tom Sterr, markone1966, Otisman68
Guest(s) 5
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6402
Chuck: 5805
steve004: 5172
1873man: 4695
deerhunter: 2692
Big Larry: 2547
twobit: 2491
mrcvs: 2192
Maverick: 2027
Newest Members:
Lambeau
Larsmack
usmc1978
Otisman68
Deaf Smith
Texasaggie19
Diego
Bkmkok
Leonardb
Skysquatch82
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14702
Posts: 131551
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9973
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
