
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12978
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005

It sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12978
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005

A standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bert H., twobit, Chuck, JWA, Anthony, TXGunNut, Thomas Beckwith, NE Herd Bull
Guest(s) 289
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6452
Chuck: 5860
steve004: 5209
1873man: 4703
deerhunter: 2711
Big Larry: 2556
twobit: 2504
mrcvs: 2212
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
Ricky Summer
Peter Cipollini
Jhark
Oldtimer52
parkerposy
rayhobbs
WebleyScott
Task1
1886
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14807
Posts: 132506
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10045
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
