
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13100
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005

It sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13100
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005

A standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4920
Currently Online: dimrod, Clayton Uthoff
Guest(s) 550
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6567
Chuck: 5943
steve004: 5237
1873man: 4716
deerhunter: 2717
Big Larry: 2567
twobit: 2513
mrcvs: 2217
Maverick: 2043
Newest Members:
tourman40
rifleman
Surfertim
6564yankees
Fox Creek
kellswater
Gary
Harper 1886
Plmggod
Doncarp
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14883
Posts: 133415
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10111
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
