Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13775
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineIt sounds like a decent deal on your part, as the ammo is not cheap.
The serial number makes it a 1946 production receiver. It should still have the checkered versus serrated hammer.
If you get curious enough, please check the barrel date.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13775
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
OfflineA standard Model 64 rifle in 32 W.S. is about the least desirable configuration that was made. The caliber is on the bottom of the list, and the plain configuration is at the bottom of the list. In that caliber, the bolt should not be milled for a sight. Can provide survey information for it?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: DEEREHART, Buck1967
Guest(s) 1013
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6983
Chuck: 6334
steve004: 5436
1873man: 4816
deerhunter: 2822
twobit: 2605
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2318
Maverick: 2132
Newest Members:
Pennview
SCWayne
Merchant of the Old West
wjw
winfan
Ranger55
GeorgeJ
Rshell
Stevepala
Angelo Colletti
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15408
Posts: 139292
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10388
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
