Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 1890 receiver stamp
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 62
Member Since:
February 2, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 2, 2013 - 2:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

HI,
I’m new to this forum but have been reading for quite a while. I have a .22 short, 2nd Model 1890 made in 1898. The front of the receiver just under the magazine has a stamp that has a circle with a circle inside and another circle inside that one. In other words it looks like a target. Does anyone know what that stamp is? I can’t find any information on that type of stamp. Thanks for any help.
Len B

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 17
Member Since:
March 9, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 2, 2013 - 5:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hello Len: This part of the receiver has inspection stamps, one to several – could be numeric, or a triangle or other – plus the stamping "WRF" for the .22 WRF rifle. I do not recall a concentric circle inspector stamp, but I have not seen them all.

Merrill

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 62
Member Since:
February 2, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 2, 2013 - 6:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for the reply Merrell,

Just to clarify, the target like stamp is on the front flat surface of the receiver directly under the magazine. I have been looking on and off for years but I never came across the same stamp.

Avatar
Guest
Guest
WACA Guest
4
February 2, 2013 - 6:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Can you post a clear photo? Never seen that stamp on a slide-action receiver. Would be something new. No mention in Schwing’s book to my knowledge.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 62
Member Since:
February 2, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 3, 2013 - 4:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I will try to post a picture. I have to read the instructions on how to post pictures to this forum. If all else fails I can PM you a pix.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2305
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
February 3, 2013 - 8:48 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I got the file and here it is. I also have never seen one like it.
1890stamp001_zps007a56b3.jpgImage Enlarger

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1118
Member Since:
May 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
February 3, 2013 - 1:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

It’s a bullseye stamp associated with the .22 WRF. It might be found on the face of the receiver, or on the upper tangs side or bottom, along with or without the WRF marking.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 62
Member Since:
February 2, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
February 3, 2013 - 1:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

This rifle is and always was a 22 short. I have a factory letter documenting the caliber and the extra options it had when it left the factory in 1898.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 17
Member Since:
March 9, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
February 3, 2013 - 2:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

hello again 66m20e: The rifle appears just a bit more classy than a standard Mo 1890. Plus you have a factory letter. Etc. You may be holding out on us by not posting more photos.

From what I observe in your photo, the concentric circles appear to be more "engraved" than a stamp. Your rifle appears to be engraved, I assume factory engraved. There could be a connection?

Merrill

Avatar
Aylmer, Quebec, Canada
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 337
Member Since:
March 23, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
February 3, 2013 - 2:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I may be completely wrong, but I "think" I have seen this same marking on one of my 1894s or 55s. It sure looks familiar. Don’t have time to pull them a ll apart right now though, but if I recall, it may have been on one of the more recent rifles I picked up. I will take a look when I can, I have to go into work this evening.

Matt

Avatar
Guest
Guest
WACA Guest
11
February 3, 2013 - 8:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for the photo.

I’ve never seen reference for this stamp which I agree looks more like engraving. If someone believes it to be a factory stamp then please provide reference.

Otherwise, I think it might be the engraver’s touch. What is shown of the engraving doesn’t look to be factory…

Can you provide some closeups of the engraving over the entire receiver and one of what the museum letter reports?

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1118
Member Since:
May 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
February 3, 2013 - 10:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

ohlode said
Thanks for the photo.

I’ve never seen reference for this stamp which I agree looks more like engraving. If someone believes it to be a factory stamp then please provide reference.

Otherwise, I think it might be the engraver’s touch. What is shown of the engraving doesn’t look to be factory…

Can you provide some closeups of the engraving over the entire receiver and one of what the museum letter reports?

ohlode,

See pages 55, 56, & 57 of Winchester Slide Action Rifles Vol. 1, for explanation and pictures. I’ve seen the bullseye stamping on numerous model 1890-90 rifles in .22 WRF caliber over the years, but I don’t ever recall seeing it on any other caliber.

James

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 17
Member Since:
March 9, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
February 4, 2013 - 6:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Good eye JWM. Page 56 of Vol. I nails it, when Schwing says "Some of these symbol stampings will be made up of two concentric circles or a triangle with the numeral 1 in the center, or other odd looking characters."

So Len, the concentric circles on your .22 short is an inspection stamp.

By the way the following page does show the concentric circles on the inside of the lower tang with the W.R.F. stamping. But I believe this is a coincidence, rather than the rule. and only on the early first and second models.

Good post Len.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1118
Member Since:
May 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
February 4, 2013 - 7:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Merrill: Thank you.

Len: Yours is the first that I recall seeing on a .22 Short, but then you know what they say about memory and age. 🙂

James

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 62
Member Since:
February 2, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
February 4, 2013 - 1:33 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

WOW! The mystery of the stamp solved at last. I was looking a long time for the answer. Thank you everyone for all your help and especially taking the time to research the issue. Great forum and I can see a real dedicated group of Winchester collectors willing to share their knowledge.
Len

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 77
Member Since:
August 1, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
February 4, 2013 - 6:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I found several of those stamps in with a box of other factory stamps from a retired Winchester gunsmith. Didn’t know what they were used on until now.

Avatar
Guest
Guest
WACA Guest
17
February 4, 2013 - 9:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

ohlode said
Thanks for the photo.

I’ve never seen reference for this stamp which I agree looks more like engraving. If someone believes it to be a factory stamp then please provide reference.

Otherwise, I think it might be the engraver’s touch. What is shown of the engraving doesn’t look to be factory…

Can you provide some closeups of the engraving over the entire receiver and one of what the museum letter reports?

ohlode,

See pages 55, 56, & 57 of Winchester Slide Action Rifles Vol. 1, for explanation and pictures. I’ve seen the bullseye stamping on numerous model 1890-90 rifles in .22 WRF caliber over the years, but I don’t ever recall seeing it on any other caliber.

James

Thanks, James! Great information. Don’t want to take this too much further but…
Inspection stamp indicating what exactly?
Was it a particular inspector or just a indication that it was "inspected". Sorry for my lack of knowledge but I’m here to learn.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1118
Member Since:
May 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
February 5, 2013 - 8:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

ohlode,

I’m here to learn as well.

I don’t know what this symbol means, but its shape causes me to think about target shooting.

James

Avatar
Guest
Guest
WACA Guest
19
February 5, 2013 - 8:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

James: Yes, that’s an interesting possibility. I would think it was specific either to an individual inspector or a particular inspection, special meaning, etc., etc.. Someone at that factory knew exactly what that stamp meant… I was actually pondering the possibility that it signified a replacement inner and outer mag tube. I like your theory better. Anyone else know or want to contribute thoughts?

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1118
Member Since:
May 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
February 6, 2013 - 1:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

ohlode said
James: Yes, that’s an interesting possibility. I would think it was specific either to an individual inspector or a particular inspection, special meaning, etc., etc.. Someone at that factory knew exactly what that stamp meant… I was actually pondering the possibility that it signified a replacement inner and outer mag tube. I like your theory better. Anyone else know or want to contribute thoughts?

ohlode,

Now that’s an interesting thought too. Thanks for your comments.

Carrying the target-idea a bit further, it would appear that of the following three calibers, .22 Short, .22 Long, and .22 WRF, the .22 Short would have been the favorite one for professional trick shooters, while the .22 WRF would seem to me to have been the favorite one for long range target shooting and or hunting. Schwing explains in his book that sights on the 1890 were set at 25 yards, but Winchester would set them at different ranges for their customers on request. The examples given were from 25 feet up to 200 yards, and if memory serves me right Ad Topperwein had his set at 25 feet. Schwing also points out that one customer requested the sights to be set at 100 feet on his .22 Short, which was equipped with a special target front sight and a mid-range tang sight. With this information and scenario in mind, wouldn’t you think that Winchester might have had an inspector to make a mark like the bulls-eye to affirm that such requests had been processed?

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6388
TXGunNut: 5057
Chuck: 4600
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2351
twobit: 2305
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12787
Posts: 111385

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8872
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation