Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
M1892 rifle on Rimfire foum
Avatar
Big Larry
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 2578
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 6, 2014 - 10:11 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

There is a nice M1892 rifle # 85456, that has the early placement of proofs on the bbl. The rifle was made in 1897 when they did not proof these. What gives? The rifle is on Gun Broker and I do not have a link. Thanks, Big Larry

Avatar
94shorties
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 378
Member Since:
July 7, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 6, 2014 - 12:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Big Larry
Here is the link to that rifle.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=398014949

Avatar
"road king"
Guest
Guests
3
March 6, 2014 - 1:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I was trying to get the same answer on this thread

http://www.winchestercollector.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6595

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2671
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
March 6, 2014 - 2:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Please post or email me a photo of the barrel address stamp on the rifle.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
mrcvs
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2418
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
March 6, 2014 - 5:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

It is likely this particular firearm went back to the factory after they started applying the proofmarks to be repaired and then was returned. The factory letter will likely state this to be the case (e.g., that the rifle was a return & repair, not that proofmarks were applied.) It is somewhat odd that the owner states that he has a letter but does not provide a photo of the letter and/or transcribe its contents.

Avatar
"road king"
Guest
Guests
6
March 6, 2014 - 5:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The owner states that the letter does not say anything about any R&R. He has not posted the letter. He called Cody and they checked their records again and did change the DOM to 1897 verses 1898, but said no R&R recorded.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: John McKean, Roger Adam, Brian Skeoch, Jeremy P, kevindpm61
Guest(s) 1108
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7230
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6602
steve004: 5585
1873man: 4889
deerhunter: 2924
twobit: 2671
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2418
Maverick: 2172
Newest Members:
BLSPIN15
BigTup
bkessingracheal
tlemmon
Nellion97
David Nestor
GTHWM94C
barney
Pioneer
jack shoe
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15729
Posts: 143019

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10582
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation