Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Is this posting legal??
Avatar
deerhunter
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2711
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
May 25, 2014 - 10:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

It’s definitely a non-original and refinished 14" carbine, so surely not interested in it. However, it doesn’t sound like the seller has an exemption letter from the ATF. Wouldn’t that make this rifle illegal to own or sell?

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=418188612#PIC

Avatar
Mike Hunter
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 352
Member Since:
January 24, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
May 26, 2014 - 4:47 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Not enough information… no SN is given.

So we don’t know if it letters.

It might already be exempt from the NFA by SN, the ATF publishes lists of guns exempt from the NFA, and updates them every few years.

http://www.atf.gov/content/firearms/firearms-technology/curios-relics

I’ve owned a couple of short rifles/carbines that were out of the letterabale range, but was on the C&R NFA exempt list.

Avatar
mrcvs
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2212
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
May 26, 2014 - 6:03 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Also, reblued, refinished wood, poor wood to metal fit. I find firearms with the aforementioned characteristics very unappealing, no matter what they are!

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2505
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 26, 2014 - 8:39 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The rifle is definitely not original and the barrel has been cut down. The forward barrel band is on the incorrect side of the front sight, the fore end is too long for a 14 inch carbine, and the barrel address is positioned incorrectly with relationship to the rear sight. On original 14 inch barrels it extends underneath the rear sight. I had been in contact with the seller a few days ago and explained the problems with the gun and the potential problems with the legality of the sale. He does not agree with my assessment. Oh well

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12979
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
May 26, 2014 - 12:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Mike Hunter said
Not enough information… no SN is given.

So we don’t know if it letters.

Mike,

The "MODEL 92" marking on the upper tang tells us that it is a post-1919 production gun, which is not letterable.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12979
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
May 29, 2014 - 9:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The auction has been pulled.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Maverick, DEEREHART, 86Win, Bill Yadlosky
Guest(s) 181
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6458
Chuck: 5867
steve004: 5209
1873man: 4703
deerhunter: 2711
Big Larry: 2559
twobit: 2505
mrcvs: 2212
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
Ricky Summer
Peter Cipollini
Jhark
Oldtimer52
parkerposy
rayhobbs
WebleyScott
Task1
1886
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14809
Posts: 132537

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10045
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation