Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
94/95 Hybtid SRC
Avatar
Anthony
Ohio
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1763
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
July 10, 2026 - 7:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5730
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
July 10, 2026 - 11:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Anthony said
Here’s an interesting 94/95 Hybrid, I saw on WACA member LeRoy Merz site today.
https://www.merzantiques.com/product/w4375-scarce-winchester-model-94-95-hybrid-saddle-ring-carbine-with-rare-95-variant-barrel-in-30-wcf-m/
 
Tony
  

Tony 

Thanks for spotting this.

Given the tap holes in barrel – I’m assuming this one utilized a M1895 carbine or musket barrel?

On this topic, I was contemplating that variation of the 94/95 Hybrid with the 22 inch barrel and the magazine that is a couple inch shorter than the barrel.  Given they reworked the ’95 barrels to match a ’94 carbine barrel profile, and they shortened and rechambered them from the breech end, why have this odd variation?  I would assume given they were repurposing ’95 barrels to produce ’94 carbines, wouldn’t they want that ’94 carbine to look like their standard ’94 carbine?  And of course, that’s what they basically did with the other three variations of the 94/95 Hybrid – those don’t appear blatantly different from a standard ’94 carbine. I suspect most have gone unnoticed over the years.  Not so with the variation I am mentioning.  Thoughts?

Avatar
Anthony
Ohio
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1763
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
July 11, 2026 - 2:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Steve,

Not being anywhere an expert on these, but I assumed it was a 1st variation of a carbine barrel, without digging into it too deep. So as far as being from a carbine barrel or a musket barrel, those are my thoughts. 

I do feel that it’s another interesting category that a few members here have enlightened us on in some other posts. 

 

Tony

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: 30gov03, cj57, twobit, Gregory, 86Win, markone1966, Ben, Steven Gabrielli, Pwog, kevindpm61, Buck94, Cracker
Guest(s) 330
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7478
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6790
steve004: 5730
1873man: 4945
deerhunter: 3017
twobit: 2710
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2493
Zebulon: 2209
Newest Members:
CZ
MarkGK
robertsimpson
Randy Ward
Cottonwood Mike
Sd45fan
Luda
AaronLPDX
Rob
Manley911
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 16070
Posts: 146653

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10852
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation