Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
4 digit model 94
Avatar
TD
New Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
January 8, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 8, 2024 - 4:08 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hello all,

I am new to the forum but have collected for many years. Only recently have I gotten interested in Winchester lever actions.

I have an opportunity to acquire a 4 digit 5XXX rifle. 

I could tell from condition the barrel was likely a replacement since the receiver is silvered with probably 20% of original finish, but the barrel still retains most of the blue.  The bore was also in better shape than I’d expect for a 129 year old 38-55.  The barrel’s bluing and the bore are worn, so I believe the replacement happened a long time ago, or an older barrel closer to period that was in better shape was used in the replacement. The caliber marking is on the left flat near the receiver, which is the other clue it’s a replacement.  Overall it doesn’t look that far out of character for the rifle.  

Wood is in good shape with the usual dings but no cracks. 

Front AND rear sight are old Marbles, but it also has an old fold down Marbles tang sight.  I suspect the replacement barrel already had a rear sight mounted, and rather than remove it, they left the three sights there.

It was inherited by someone who I think knows little about it, so it isn’t being advertised as anything special.  If I can find a box of 38-55 i will try it out.

I think from reading that if it were the original barrel it would fetch in the ballpark of 3K?   Just guessing, I’d think about half that amount would be fair, however, I don’t know enough about 1894’s to know what’s fair with the replacement barrel. I don’t have pics, but assuming it’s a solid rifle in decent shooting shape, am I far off on the actual value?

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12979
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
January 8, 2024 - 5:31 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Is it a First or a Second variation Model 1894? Solid Frame or Take Down?  Is the barrel marked with the August 21, 1894 patent date?

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
TD
New Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
January 8, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
January 9, 2024 - 4:56 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

overall-pic.jpegImage Enlarger

muzzle.jpegImage Enlarger
receiver-left-side.jpegImage Enlarger
receiver-right-side.jpgImage Enlarger
barrel-marking.jpegImage Enlarger

 

Hello Bert,

It took some searching to figure out what makes it a 1st or 2nd variation.  From the pics, I think this is a first?  In any case, it’s solid frame.

Barrel marked as shown with August 21, 1894. However, as I mentioned, the caliber marking is on the left side barrel flat.

End of barrel is not blued and looks like it has a bit of a crown.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12979
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 9, 2024 - 5:22 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

It is a First variation Model 1894, but the barrel on it is positively not original to that rifle.  The barrel is a replacement that is at least 12-years newer than the rest of the rifle.  The attached picture below shows the correct style marking that Winchester roll marked on the First variation barrels.

What is the complete serial number on this rifle?

3079-5.jpgImage Enlarger

 

Bert

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Jeremy P
The Great State
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 917
Member Since:
April 30, 2023
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
5
January 9, 2024 - 1:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

In that one pic, it also looks like the mag tube extends a hair beyond the muzzle also…

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6458
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
January 9, 2024 - 1:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Jeremy P said
In that one pic, it also looks like the mag tube extends a hair beyond the muzzle also…

  

Probably OK, looks like it’s not installed correctly. 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: winchester73, 426crown, deerhunter, tim tomlinson, keith shaffer, Bill Hanzel, Jeremy P
Guest(s) 441
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6458
Chuck: 5867
steve004: 5209
1873man: 4703
deerhunter: 2711
Big Larry: 2559
twobit: 2505
mrcvs: 2212
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
Ricky Summer
Peter Cipollini
Jhark
Oldtimer52
parkerposy
rayhobbs
WebleyScott
Task1
1886
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14809
Posts: 132537

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10045
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation