Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
2 Proof Marks On Barrel 1 On Receiver
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
New Mexico
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1167
Member Since:
December 1, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
September 14, 2016 - 3:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I haven’t seen this before:  2 different proof mark on the barrel but only 1 on the receiver.  This is on an 1894 Winchester rifle made in 1914.  I suspect it means the rifle was rebarreled with a factory barrel but done by a gunsmith, not by Winchester.  Can someone enlighten me on these marking?

1894.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

1876-4-1.jpg

"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend." 

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4276
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
September 14, 2016 - 3:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Wayne,

The circle P proof means its is a barrel that was sent out from the factory for field replacement.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
New Mexico
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1167
Member Since:
December 1, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
September 14, 2016 - 4:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks, Bob.  These markings are on a rifle that’s being offered online.  The seller doesn’t mention the barrel has been replaced but I thought the price was a bit too low for it to be an original configuration.

1876-4-1.jpg

"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend." 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10710
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
September 14, 2016 - 5:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I personally suspect that the second proof mark on the barrel was added after the fact (not factory).  As Bob mentioned, the “P” in the circle indicates that it is a mail order replacement barrel.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 532
Member Since:
December 27, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
September 15, 2016 - 12:04 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I’m feeling the answer to my question is obvious to most members here, but I’m going to ask:

Why add the proof stamp to a barrel that already shows it is a Winchester replacement?  Practicing for future forgery?

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4276
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
September 15, 2016 - 1:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

FromTheWoods said
I’m feeling the answer to my question is obvious to most members here, but I’m going to ask:

Why add the proof stamp to a barrel that already shows it is a Winchester replacement?  Practicing for future forgery?  

Winchester normally proofed a mail order barrel. The one pictured in the first post is just a ugly stamp job.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10710
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
September 15, 2016 - 3:33 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

FromTheWoods said
I’m feeling the answer to my question is obvious to most members here, but I’m going to ask:

Why add the proof stamp to a barrel that already shows it is a Winchester replacement?  Practicing for future forgery?  

In my opinion, it is not a “Winchester” replacement.  That barrel was replaced by someone else.  Note that the “P” proof mark stamp is very clean looking (professionally stamped).  The “WP” proof stamp is sloppy (non professionally) stamped.  I suspect it was added after the fact in an attempt to make it appear that Winchester installed the mail order replacement barrel.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 532
Member Since:
December 27, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
September 15, 2016 - 7:33 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thank you both for your answers.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 263
Member Since:
November 17, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
September 15, 2016 - 12:33 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

The PW proof being added is certainly a legit possibility. But it is also possible that Winchester took a mail order P oval proofed barrel and used that in a factory done rebarreling job. The new double struck PW could/would have been added at that time. The  first proof is done clean and nice, the second done by another workman and not as nice. Double struck proofs are common on original Winchester rifles so that is no indicator of factory or not. Perfectly struck but fake PW proofs can be done by many, many gunsmith’s so a clean PW is also no guarantee.

Avatar
NE OREGON
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 535
Member Since:
July 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
September 15, 2016 - 1:28 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I’m a little confused here…it was my understanding that if one was to send one of these old rifles back to the factory for a new barrel, the factory would install the barrel and stamp it with a W/P proof to signify the barrel was a Winchester barrel. If a barrel was sent out of the factory for installation by a gunsmith or someone else, then the barrel would get a W/P proof indicating it was a Winchester barrel, and also a circle “P” proof indicating that it was put on outside the factory. Is that correct or am I forgetting something here? Thanks

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4276
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
September 15, 2016 - 2:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Peter,

You are correct but the WP proof is not to tell its a Winchester barrel, it was put on after the barrel passed the proof firing test.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
NE OREGON
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 535
Member Since:
July 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
September 15, 2016 - 2:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Got it Bob…thanks!

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 163
Member Since:
January 22, 1999
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
September 15, 2016 - 2:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man said

Winchester normally proofed a mail order barrel. The one pictured in the first post is just a ugly stamp job.

Bob  

 

I would have to agree with Bob on his statement above. Why wouldn’t Winchester put the W/P proof mark on their barrel, to indicate that it was inspected and proofed as a factory product.

I would imagine that Winchester, just went to the Barrel bin with already made up barrels, that were proofed with the W/P, awaiting factory assembly, for that specific Barrel.

When a mail order came in for a replacement barrel, Winchester then proofed it with the Circle P , indicating it was sent out through the mail to whoever (not factory) for replacement.

If you take notice, the Oval W/P on the receiver is more circular, than the one on the barrel, which is more Oval (like the W/P doesn’t even fit in it) wish I could transpose the two stamps. This might be the cause of time frame that the barrel was ordered and shipped out,(difference of mfg date of the receiver and barrel) .

Also look at the barrel stamps, it appears that the same person stamped it. Both markings are offset to the right, (deeper impressions of the stamp) I would surmise that the barrel was just laid on the work bench and stamped , without holding the barrel in a vise or having another worker hold it while it’s being stamped. 

I would agree with Bert’s statement had he said, (that it was not a Winchester Factory Replaced Barrel) no offense there Bert, I think that is what you were implying just trying to put things into perspective. To clarify, the complete rifle was not sent back to the Winchester Factory for a replacement barrel, ie. change of caliber, wanted a octagon barrel, magazine tube shorter or longer than original, or any other reason the barrel might have to be replaced. 

So in reality, these are only my thoughts (opinion) on the Winchester in question with the markings as such, maybe if it was disassembled there is a barrel date stamped on it as to when it was made.

From the Twilight Zone, I hope ya’ll don’t think I am to far out there,

  hokie

Wayne, I think you had the correct idea as to the markings. It’s always nice to post a question for different points of view from other members.

"I Would Have Rather Lived Through The Industrial Revaluation"

"Instead of The Space Age"

From

 The Twilight Zone

 

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4953
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
September 17, 2016 - 12:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Eagle said
I’m a little confused here…it was my understanding that if one was to send one of these old rifles back to the factory for a new barrel, the factory would install the barrel and stamp it with a W/P proof to signify the barrel was a Winchester barrel. If a barrel was sent out of the factory for installation by a gunsmith or someone else, then the barrel would get a W/P proof indicating it was a Winchester barrel, and also a circle “P” proof indicating that it was put on outside the factory. Is that correct or am I forgetting something here? Thanks  

It’s my recollection that if a rifle like this one was returned to Winchester for re-barreling there would likely be a second proof on the receiver.

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
NE OREGON
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 535
Member Since:
July 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
September 17, 2016 - 1:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have never seen an old Winchester with two W/P proofs on the receiver if that’s what you are saying.

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4276
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
September 17, 2016 - 1:46 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Here is a good thread where proof marks were discussed.

wp-and-oval-p-markings

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4953
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
September 17, 2016 - 9:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Eagle said
I have never seen an old Winchester with two W/P proofs on the receiver if that’s what you are saying.  

Can’t say I have either, was trying to find where I read that and can’t find it at the moment. Thought it was the Renneberg or Madis book but didn’t find it today. May have misunderstood a discussion of barrels with two proof marks. This thread and the one linked above (and another linked in that thread) has me studying a couple of rifles with no visible proof marks. Way off-topic so I’ll study on it a bit more and start another thread.

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1874
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
18
September 19, 2016 - 3:29 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Here’s a pretty extreme example of a double-struck proof-mark on the receiver.  I’m assuming the stamp wandered when it was originally struck at the factory since it’s nearly identical to the proof-mark on the barrel.

http://www.gunbroker.com/item/585476222

Avatar
SO. Oregon
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 678
Member Since:
June 5, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
19
September 23, 2016 - 6:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

CJS57 said
The PW proof being added is certainly a legit possibility. But it is also possible that Winchester took a mail order P oval proofed barrel and used that in a factory done rebarreling job. The new double struck PW could/would have been added at that time. The  first proof is done clean and nice, the second done by another workman and not as nice. Double struck proofs are common on original Winchester rifles so that is no indicator of factory or not. Perfectly struck but fake PW proofs can be done by many, many gunsmith’s so a clean PW is also no guarantee.  

| |

Sad a fine company would sell an instrument used in forgery.

Winchester Proof Mark Hand Stamp

Hardened steel stamp for use on wood, metal or leather surfaces. Features the letters P and W in an oval. Commonly found on the breech end of most Winchester firearm barrels including models 12 and 97 trench and riot guns. Use for restoration purposes only. Manufactured by Numrich Gun Parts Corporation.
Image Product # Manufacturer Model Description

View Larger Image 850750 WINCHESTER 97 SOLID FRAME, 97 TAKEDOWN, 12 Proofmark Hand Stamp
Our Price: $84.80

Vince
Southern Oregon
NRA member
Fraternal Order of Eagles

 “There is but one answer to be made to the dynamite bomb and that can best be made by the Winchester rifle.”

Teddy Roosevelt 

4029-1.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 12
Member Since:
September 30, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
October 1, 2016 - 10:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Newbe here,

I own a model 1886, .50 Express. It has 2 proof marks on the barrel. It was drilled and tapped on the barrel for a scope, one of the screw holes going  through the proof mark obliterating about half of it. A second proof was added, and that leads me to believe the drilling and tapping may have been done at the factory. My reasoning being, if some gunsmith out in the sticks did the sacrilege ( the drilling and tapping) why bother to send it back to Winchester to have it reproofed? I always though it was done way back “when” because, as I remember it the hole pattern looked like it was intended for one of those old scopes that was very long.  I personally have owned this rifle for more than 40 years, and the fellow I got it from had owned it for almost 40 years as well. I will have to dig it out to check it again.

It’s great to be able to talk with people about guns that don’t begin with “Glock”. Thanks!

John

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: deerhunter
Guest(s) 55
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6261
TXGunNut: 4953
Chuck: 4554
1873man: 4276
steve004: 4148
Big Larry: 2322
twobit: 2289
TR: 1708
mrcvs: 1695
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12611
Posts: 109716

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1741
Members: 8776
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation