Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1895 markings questions.
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5059
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
January 1, 2021 - 11:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

 If the action had really been designed to handle .30-06 pressure, shooting it “a lot” wouldn’t cause this problem.  But when it was on the drawing board, the .30-06 hadn’t yet been conceived, & by the time it was, Browning had parted ways with Winchester.  

I had never really thought it through from this perspective.  I am now.  Interesting.  

Avatar
Brooksy
Guest
WACA Guest
22
January 2, 2021 - 12:11 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I suspect if the bore is bright with sharp rifleing I should be good. If the bore isn’t good I’ll pass anyway.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5059
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
23
January 2, 2021 - 12:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

If you purchased a .30-06 M1895 off of an internet auction (or any seller) that offered inspection privileges, and you had a no-go gauge, you could use that gauge as part of the inspection process in evaluating whether you want to keep the rifle.  I am somewhat pessimistic given Tim’s experience with the large percentage of .30-06 95’s that he has tried a no-gauge in – and the gauge closed on the bolt. 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bill Hockett, Bill Hanzel, Jeremy P, Mopglen, kevindpm61
Guest(s) 114
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6237
Chuck: 5668
steve004: 5059
1873man: 4669
Big Larry: 2517
twobit: 2485
mrcvs: 2150
Maverick: 1984
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14508
Posts: 129331

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2030
Members: 9840
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation